16:01:32 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 16:01:33 Meeting started Tue May 26 16:01:32 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:36 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 16:01:37 #topic office hours 16:05:30 ok, so just sum up where are we. 16:05:41 Like patch for octopus is failing for centos 7 16:06:09 as it looks like it anyway needs manager but without some dashboards 16:06:17 https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/93ac414156584b46816207c3a78bb54f/log/logs/host/ceph-mon@aio1.service.journal-14-27-26.log.txt 16:08:14 ok, I think we can try disabling dashboard only with dashboard_enabled 16:11:37 Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix inventory_manage when the component for a host is not defined https://review.opendev.org/730871 16:11:44 o/ hello 16:12:17 \o/ 16:12:37 did you have any progress with ubuntu? 16:13:06 I just understood mgariepy's dissapointement with btrfs lol 16:13:32 like there is package that makes you create btrfs but you can't just mount it afterwards 16:14:02 I think we have dir type isntead even for CI, so wath thinking about doing it default for centos 8 16:14:17 But probably we should do matel only at first 16:14:23 and afterwards fix lxc 16:15:22 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Update ceph release to octopus https://review.opendev.org/729331 16:15:46 Like I really want to merge this octopus thing (if we want it) asap and finally branch 16:16:02 ubuntu..... 16:16:11 As next week we have a ptg and without anything on our hands that would be really dissapointing 16:16:25 i've not got anywhere since last week when i had a good poke at it 16:16:55 i think thats getting to a similar poing as centos-8 where we need to fast-track merging the 'safe' changes 16:17:04 as the depends-on are already getting out of hand 16:17:11 yeah 16:17:23 smth for review? 16:17:49 https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:osa-focal+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 16:17:54 this is not as broken as it looks 16:18:13 the cause of all the trouble is this one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729883/ 16:18:31 and that is near the bottom of the stack of lxc_hosts patches so fails the rest 16:19:25 maybe rebasing the rest just onto master so they can merge independently then i can see if i can spend some more time on it tomorrow? 16:20:09 Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-tests master: Add Ubuntu Focal non voting check jobs https://review.opendev.org/729854 16:20:20 yeah, ok 16:20:30 this is good now https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729867/ 16:20:44 Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Add legacy config key mappings for lxc version 4 https://review.opendev.org/729919 16:20:57 Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Use btrfs-progs instead of btrfs-tools https://review.opendev.org/729876 16:21:33 Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Add vars files and container prep script for ubuntu focal https://review.opendev.org/729937 16:22:11 btw, maybe you see/know what we set to do dir lxc? 16:22:32 just don't see obvious things at the moment 16:22:50 lxc_container_backing_store: dir 16:22:52 i think 16:23:15 afaik there is lvm too perhaps 16:23:24 but it's been a while since i looked at this 16:23:24 and machinectl... 16:23:39 it uses machinectl for the base image regardless i think 16:23:39 I was jsut trying not to touch it :p 16:25:00 heres it is, dir is the default https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/src/branch/master/defaults/main.yml#L86 16:27:35 why do we use btrfs by default for functional tests then... 16:27:44 ok, that's another question 16:27:52 thanks 16:29:18 do we? 16:29:37 oh i have no idea, you mean in lxc_hosts functional tests? 16:29:44 yeah 16:30:12 like it's failing futher with missing aria2c.... 16:30:13 that can be changed easily - I think the integrated repo uses dir maybe 16:30:47 yeah, I think it probably is 16:32:52 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: [WIP] centos-8 support https://review.opendev.org/728108 16:33:05 hmmm whats happend to this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729878/ 16:33:14 like no lxc jobs :) 16:33:35 ah damn 16:33:41 I rebased it wrongly 16:33:47 doh 16:34:28 we have so much stuff going that I really a bit lost 16:35:29 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Return lxc jobs https://review.opendev.org/729878 16:36:07 o/ sorry guys let me catch up here but in advance, if you have some priorities I could give my reviews now please let me know 16:36:37 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/730730/ 16:37:38 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Return lxc jobs https://review.opendev.org/729878 16:37:53 argh 16:38:16 jrosser: do you have zuul jobs when download https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729878/ ? 16:38:23 lxc ones I mean 16:38:48 no i dont 16:39:19 wtf.... I see them in project.yaml 16:39:48 err what is going on 16:39:51 now they are ther 16:40:17 that's damn good question. The better one is also where are zuul check if they are there 16:40:36 just to check 16:40:44 you mean the job results from zuul? 16:40:48 yeah 16:41:00 as you may see zuul didn't grab them 16:42:14 err well i see this? https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3cb3756d8ec4424c87575ad8614069ce/log/job-output.txt 16:43:20 I mean check currently running jobs for this task 16:43:23 there's no lxc 16:43:48 *this patch 16:44:24 agree they are not running now 16:44:49 tbh I dunno why when donloading patch I see them present 16:45:05 let me probably create it from scratch then 16:47:42 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Update ceph release to octopus https://review.opendev.org/729331 16:47:52 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Return lxc jobs https://review.opendev.org/729878 16:48:09 if i use the gerrit UI and add zuul.d/project.yml to that patch then this is what i see http://paste.openstack.org/show/794012/ 16:48:25 like the line is already there 16:48:27 yeah 16:48:37 but why zuul not checking it then.... 16:48:43 and how it has appeared there lol 16:48:46 but this says otherwise https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible/src/branch/master/zuul.d/project.yaml 16:50:53 ok 16:51:01 Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Return lxc jobs https://review.opendev.org/729878 16:51:04 I think I figured it out 16:51:27 too much stuff we're working on at the same time... 16:52:32 jrosser: do oyu have smth to add to the discussion list on ptg? https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-ansible-ptg 16:55:03 oh i had some notes (some likley a bit extreme) so i'll paste those in 16:56:00 o_O 17:00:33 now I don't have feeling that booked 8 hours are too much 17:00:40 #endmeeting