15:01:48 <noonedeadpunk> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting
15:01:48 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Mar 25 15:01:48 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:48 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:48 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'
15:01:53 <noonedeadpunk> #topic rollcall
15:01:56 <noonedeadpunk> o/
15:01:56 <NeilHanlon> o/ was just about to poke you! :D
15:01:59 <jrosser> o/ hello
15:02:06 <noonedeadpunk> sorry for being a bit late :)
15:02:22 <NeilHanlon> i only just got here 3 seconds before, so... ;)
15:04:56 <noonedeadpunk> #topic office hours
15:05:14 <noonedeadpunk> so, I think main question for today is PTG and it's planned time?
15:05:45 <noonedeadpunk> given that we're still lacking a good agenda for it... and last years participation was not high...
15:05:59 <noonedeadpunk> I'd guess we should be fine with 2h timeslot?
15:06:19 <jrosser> we will be missing andrew this time i think
15:06:25 <NeilHanlon> 2h sounds good, i'll make it :)
15:07:42 <noonedeadpunk> 15:00 - 17:00 UTC?
15:07:51 <noonedeadpunk> Tuesday?
15:08:20 <noonedeadpunk> or 16-17 to reduce conflicts a little bit?
15:08:59 * jrosser tries to work out even which dates this is
15:09:10 <noonedeadpunk> April 7-11
15:09:19 <noonedeadpunk> So April 8
15:09:46 <noonedeadpunk> or well. we can do this April 7 on Monday - these slots are very empty there
15:10:00 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html
15:10:28 <noonedeadpunk> I'm just thinking that eventlet one might be an interesting for sure
15:10:58 <jrosser> 8th is difficult for me
15:11:50 <noonedeadpunk> should I create some kind of poll and ask for some votes through ML?
15:12:03 <noonedeadpunk> (ie doodle or smth)
15:16:46 <noonedeadpunk> or what would fit you best ?
15:17:03 <jrosser> 9th is pretty clear
15:17:09 <NeilHanlon> whatever works for yall i can make work
15:17:42 <noonedeadpunk> 15 - 17?
15:18:20 <NeilHanlon> +1 here
15:18:37 <jrosser> yeah thats ok
15:18:42 <noonedeadpunk> I'm fine with 9th
15:18:57 <noonedeadpunk> ok, agreed then
15:19:12 <noonedeadpunk> I will try to come up with some kind of agenda this week
15:19:39 <noonedeadpunk> and book a timeslot :)
15:20:33 <noonedeadpunk> anything else to discuss now?
15:20:53 <jrosser> only that we need extra attention on code review for the next few months
15:20:59 <noonedeadpunk> yes
15:21:29 <jrosser> andrewbonney is on paternity leave for ~4mo and has been very active reviewing
15:21:30 <noonedeadpunk> and some reviews are highly appreciated
15:21:48 <noonedeadpunk> especially we're closer and closer to the release date
15:21:51 <jrosser> so we have to make up the effort from elsewhere during his absence
15:22:14 <noonedeadpunk> and our review dashbopard can help to figure out outstanding things quite quickly
15:22:16 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://openinfra.org/cla/
15:22:22 <noonedeadpunk> #link http://bit.ly/osa-review-board-v5
15:22:29 <noonedeadpunk> that is the correct one ^
15:22:38 <noonedeadpunk> ignore CLA :D
15:24:29 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Add a collection for managing encryption of secret data  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/943866
15:25:12 <noonedeadpunk> also - once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/945115 lands - I want to issue a beta release
15:25:22 <NeilHanlon> awesome :)
15:25:37 <NeilHanlon> I will pick up some slack for Andrew
15:26:13 <noonedeadpunk> (or well, I'd need to push another patch for beta to freeze roles)
15:26:20 <noonedeadpunk> (and make beta out of it)
15:27:07 <noonedeadpunk> but https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/945089 needs to land to create such freeze
15:27:59 <noonedeadpunk> given that we had quite slow-paced cycle - hopefully we'd be able to release early at least this time...
15:30:30 <noonedeadpunk> but yes - please, go through the review dashboard once in a while :)
15:32:46 <noonedeadpunk> there are couple of nice changes lying around, fwiw
15:33:15 <noonedeadpunk> and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942581 is a one with potential side-effects
15:36:47 <noonedeadpunk> (or well, there's a whole topic around this one)
15:39:27 <NeilHanlon> :)
15:41:09 <noonedeadpunk> I guess I'm not sure why https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942783/ is failing though...
15:42:08 <noonedeadpunk> oh, well
15:45:11 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Switch volume catalog_type to block-storage  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/945476
15:46:07 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Disable v3 endpoints by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942783
15:47:08 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia master: Align on cinder service naming  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/942582
15:49:08 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove master: Switch volume catalog_type to block-storage  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/945477
15:50:50 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Disable v3 endpoints by default  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942783
15:53:59 <noonedeadpunk> #endmeeting