15:01:48 <noonedeadpunk> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 15:01:48 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Mar 25 15:01:48 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:48 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:48 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 15:01:53 <noonedeadpunk> #topic rollcall 15:01:56 <noonedeadpunk> o/ 15:01:56 <NeilHanlon> o/ was just about to poke you! :D 15:01:59 <jrosser> o/ hello 15:02:06 <noonedeadpunk> sorry for being a bit late :) 15:02:22 <NeilHanlon> i only just got here 3 seconds before, so... ;) 15:04:56 <noonedeadpunk> #topic office hours 15:05:14 <noonedeadpunk> so, I think main question for today is PTG and it's planned time? 15:05:45 <noonedeadpunk> given that we're still lacking a good agenda for it... and last years participation was not high... 15:05:59 <noonedeadpunk> I'd guess we should be fine with 2h timeslot? 15:06:19 <jrosser> we will be missing andrew this time i think 15:06:25 <NeilHanlon> 2h sounds good, i'll make it :) 15:07:42 <noonedeadpunk> 15:00 - 17:00 UTC? 15:07:51 <noonedeadpunk> Tuesday? 15:08:20 <noonedeadpunk> or 16-17 to reduce conflicts a little bit? 15:08:59 * jrosser tries to work out even which dates this is 15:09:10 <noonedeadpunk> April 7-11 15:09:19 <noonedeadpunk> So April 8 15:09:46 <noonedeadpunk> or well. we can do this April 7 on Monday - these slots are very empty there 15:10:00 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html 15:10:28 <noonedeadpunk> I'm just thinking that eventlet one might be an interesting for sure 15:10:58 <jrosser> 8th is difficult for me 15:11:50 <noonedeadpunk> should I create some kind of poll and ask for some votes through ML? 15:12:03 <noonedeadpunk> (ie doodle or smth) 15:16:46 <noonedeadpunk> or what would fit you best ? 15:17:03 <jrosser> 9th is pretty clear 15:17:09 <NeilHanlon> whatever works for yall i can make work 15:17:42 <noonedeadpunk> 15 - 17? 15:18:20 <NeilHanlon> +1 here 15:18:37 <jrosser> yeah thats ok 15:18:42 <noonedeadpunk> I'm fine with 9th 15:18:57 <noonedeadpunk> ok, agreed then 15:19:12 <noonedeadpunk> I will try to come up with some kind of agenda this week 15:19:39 <noonedeadpunk> and book a timeslot :) 15:20:33 <noonedeadpunk> anything else to discuss now? 15:20:53 <jrosser> only that we need extra attention on code review for the next few months 15:20:59 <noonedeadpunk> yes 15:21:29 <jrosser> andrewbonney is on paternity leave for ~4mo and has been very active reviewing 15:21:30 <noonedeadpunk> and some reviews are highly appreciated 15:21:48 <noonedeadpunk> especially we're closer and closer to the release date 15:21:51 <jrosser> so we have to make up the effort from elsewhere during his absence 15:22:14 <noonedeadpunk> and our review dashbopard can help to figure out outstanding things quite quickly 15:22:16 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://openinfra.org/cla/ 15:22:22 <noonedeadpunk> #link http://bit.ly/osa-review-board-v5 15:22:29 <noonedeadpunk> that is the correct one ^ 15:22:38 <noonedeadpunk> ignore CLA :D 15:24:29 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Add a collection for managing encryption of secret data https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/943866 15:25:12 <noonedeadpunk> also - once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/945115 lands - I want to issue a beta release 15:25:22 <NeilHanlon> awesome :) 15:25:37 <NeilHanlon> I will pick up some slack for Andrew 15:26:13 <noonedeadpunk> (or well, I'd need to push another patch for beta to freeze roles) 15:26:20 <noonedeadpunk> (and make beta out of it) 15:27:07 <noonedeadpunk> but https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/945089 needs to land to create such freeze 15:27:59 <noonedeadpunk> given that we had quite slow-paced cycle - hopefully we'd be able to release early at least this time... 15:30:30 <noonedeadpunk> but yes - please, go through the review dashboard once in a while :) 15:32:46 <noonedeadpunk> there are couple of nice changes lying around, fwiw 15:33:15 <noonedeadpunk> and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942581 is a one with potential side-effects 15:36:47 <noonedeadpunk> (or well, there's a whole topic around this one) 15:39:27 <NeilHanlon> :) 15:41:09 <noonedeadpunk> I guess I'm not sure why https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942783/ is failing though... 15:42:08 <noonedeadpunk> oh, well 15:45:11 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Switch volume catalog_type to block-storage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/945476 15:46:07 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Disable v3 endpoints by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942783 15:47:08 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia master: Align on cinder service naming https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/942582 15:49:08 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove master: Switch volume catalog_type to block-storage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_trove/+/945477 15:50:50 <opendevreview> Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Disable v3 endpoints by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/942783 15:53:59 <noonedeadpunk> #endmeeting