15:00:34 #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting 15:00:34 Meeting started Tue May 13 15:00:34 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:34 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' 15:00:38 #topic rollcall 15:00:40 o/ 15:00:53 o/ 15:03:45 o/ 15:06:31 #topic office hours 15:06:44 so I think we are super close today 15:06:54 to get roles branched witrh 2025.1 15:07:37 I'm not sure we do have hard blockers actually 15:07:49 o/ 15:08:29 it is a shame to miss the swift stuff 15:08:29 there are some Swift outstanding improvements, but I think we may be able to backport them after branching 15:08:35 hah :) 15:08:38 ^ that 15:08:56 its basically broken so this is bugfix work 15:08:58 today the blocker for them are 0775 permissions in /etc on Rocky 15:09:17 we can try to address it in ssh_keypairs role 15:09:46 but I feel weird changing permissions for etc 15:10:01 can we do it in zuul pre task or something 15:10:06 thats less wierd 15:10:17 as its a CI specific fix, in a CI specific place 15:10:30 yeah.. i can get it fixed but it probably will take too long to be meaningful for us 15:10:45 i have to build and test and publish containers, then nodepool would have to rebuild them... then propagate that out... 15:11:16 I'm thinking if this can be done in CI for upgrade jobs... 15:11:23 if in some pre_tasks 15:11:32 it can work, yeah, I will try this out 15:11:49 and the next confusing/broken thing is OVS for Noble. 15:12:00 #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9199af1212034c2fbc4f086c0569416a 15:12:17 and I was able to reproduce this, it seems 15:12:51 so potentially this might be quite valid bug 15:13:38 hmm i wonder if we have the right version 15:14:09 like assumption of ovs version vs distro repo vs UCA ..... 15:14:27 in AIO I got 3.5.0 15:14:33 but also 15:14:36 metal is passing 15:14:51 https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/8f30d7d8d8e64d1ba25e6aa46f09f4cf 15:15:29 having said all this - the other jobs are all OVN which uses OVS under the hood 15:16:01 so that side of things is OK on noble 15:16:29 well. OVN is kinda different, as it's not neutron code that need to deal with OVS wiring and namespaces and etc 15:16:51 its Neutron -> OVN -> OVS 15:17:43 and i just catch up with this - it's the LXC version of this job which fails but metal is OK 15:18:12 yeah, which is weird 15:18:22 but seems reproducible at very least 15:18:32 I jsut did not check on logs in my AIO yet 15:19:11 Other then that... I guess I'd love to land https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/946281 regardless, before branching happens 15:19:39 Probably it's a bit too late, but also I'm not sure what we are actually testing now 15:19:53 this should have been done right after the beta 15:20:23 theres some errors about dropped packets on bt-int https://3e3b9bb51c4bbfcca1ce-b2ab9ab260082d15bc4e79c36fac49d2.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/openstack/9199af1212034c2fbc4f086c0569416a/logs/host/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log.txt 15:21:45 I have same log pretty much on aio, yes 15:24:18 it can boil down to some brdige setup and veth 15:24:50 as we connect br-provider in ovs with br-vlan in lxb thrtough veth eth12 15:30:31 but yeah - other then that things look pretty good 15:31:12 it will be good to get the release done to work on new ansible and also cutting the number of jobs back where possible 15:32:06 I don't think we will in fact drop anything 15:32:12 as Debian 13 is pretty much released 15:32:26 so I assume we'll need to look into it as well 15:33:53 i have a few patches outstanding for zuul errors cleanup in stable and unmaintained 15:34:06 and also a few that can't be merged 15:34:10 wich are not passing 15:34:12 yeah 15:34:39 idk if we want to get them force merged or not 15:34:53 but there is a problem that the 2023.2 branch is deleted from the service repos 15:34:57 but not from ours 15:35:03 so i think thats a big cause of the trouble 15:36:04 oh... right... 15:36:26 I think I need to look on EOM-ing the branch 15:36:54 yep - there are several processes, EOM-ing, unmaintaining etc 15:37:10 and of course we are somewhat offset from those today compared to the rest of the projects 15:37:19 zed is messy right now in particular 15:38:38 I frankly did not look into CI results except saw they're not feeling good 15:40:55 ok, so to sum up plan for this week - branch roles, propose rc1, EOM 2023.2, check what's up with Zed 15:43:56 and try to figure out OVS/Swift 15:51:14 Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Ensure /etc permissions in CI https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/949647 15:51:47 Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift master: Migrate ring distribution to SSHCA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_swift/+/946990 15:51:58 let's see if that will help 15:52:41 oh, one thing I wanted to discuss actually 15:53:04 which is this patch 15:53:06 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/949497 15:53:38 and if we wanna go this route, or better to properly patch tooling and add support for deploy-guide folders import to Zanata instead 15:53:48 as eventually - this patch is pretty much a workaround 15:54:38 over stuff related to the translations overall 15:56:43 so any input/ideas on how we prefer moving forward is really appreciated 15:59:19 or we can try this way and revert if it does not work... 15:59:33 #endmeeting