15:01:06 <noonedeadpunk> #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting
15:01:06 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 12 15:01:06 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:06 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:06 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'
15:01:11 <noonedeadpunk> #topic rollcall
15:01:13 <noonedeadpunk> o/
15:05:28 <noonedeadpunk> #topic office hours
15:05:40 <noonedeadpunk> so not a lot of folks around theser days....
15:07:10 <noonedeadpunk> EL 10 support
15:07:27 <noonedeadpunk> I was able to add a passing CI jobs for it. It also required some more fixes though
15:07:29 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22osa/el10%22+status:open
15:07:49 <noonedeadpunk> one problem is that python3-lxc was not built for epel which is unfortunate
15:08:04 <noonedeadpunk> Rocky is still blocked with systemd-networkd not being present for EPEL
15:08:22 <noonedeadpunk> But I think having CentOS 10 Stream passing is really a good start
15:08:51 <noonedeadpunk> so please review patches, and we also need to backport them to Epoxy I believe
15:10:56 <noonedeadpunk> I also did some clean-ups for integrated repo
15:11:20 <noonedeadpunk> One thing to mention - is removing dependency on etcd role, as we no longer need it for Zun
15:11:48 <noonedeadpunk> Another part - is re-arranging upgrade playbooks and moving them
15:12:01 <noonedeadpunk> But this is smth I'd really love to have a discussion around
15:12:36 <noonedeadpunk> As my proposal was to move them to plugins repo into "tools" folder, which is potentially what might be eligible for ops repo instead
15:13:52 <jrosser> I will be back next week
15:14:00 <noonedeadpunk> ++
15:14:25 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/956949
15:15:05 <noonedeadpunk> for the log/history - so that is the proposal, but then it might make sense to move some playbooks from here as well: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/src/branch/master/ansible_tools/playbooks
15:15:10 <noonedeadpunk> or do vice-versa
15:15:16 <noonedeadpunk> but let's discuss next week
15:15:55 <noonedeadpunk> Another clean-up story was around deprecated release scripts.
15:16:23 <noonedeadpunk> With that I also took time and proposed to move relevant tooling I use to produce bumps from my internal repo to the integrated repo
15:16:29 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/957112
15:16:36 <noonedeadpunk> ofc after some refactoring
15:17:04 <noonedeadpunk> I'm not sure whether it's a good idea or not, as it adds a new binary to the venv
15:17:38 <noonedeadpunk> though I'm open for proposals and comments if it should be done, or worth to maintain that separately
15:18:34 <noonedeadpunk> there're also some clean-up to remove vagrantfile, tox envs, etc
15:19:47 <noonedeadpunk> and the last thing - started working on haproxy coverage with molecule
15:19:50 <noonedeadpunk> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/956931
15:20:05 <noonedeadpunk> all new tests are expected as follow-ups to this one
15:20:21 <noonedeadpunk> which just adopts what we had in functional ones (which is close to nothing)
15:21:12 <noonedeadpunk> CI looks fine and quite healthy overall
15:21:27 <noonedeadpunk> Though review debt keep growing, unfortunatelly :(
15:21:46 <noonedeadpunk> (which is also kinda expected during summer)
15:26:13 <noonedeadpunk> DavidGomez: I was wondering about other thing regarding Rocky, and if 10-ubi-init dockerr image is planned?
15:26:18 <noonedeadpunk> https://quay.io/repository/rockylinux/rockylinux?tab=tags
15:26:27 <noonedeadpunk> as there is that for rocky 9 and 8
15:26:30 <noonedeadpunk> but not for 10
15:26:58 <noonedeadpunk> we use such images usually for molecule testing
15:27:55 <noonedeadpunk> other distros we are taking from https://quay.io/user/gotmax23/
15:28:44 <noonedeadpunk> but it feels somebody needs to propose PR to them if there are not gonna be official rocky docker image with systemd
15:29:42 <DavidGomez> o/
15:30:34 <DavidGomez> I went to SIG/Storage for Rocky and it looks like some work has started for ceph-reef for Rocky 8 and 9
15:31:43 <DavidGomez> ceph-squid and ceph-tentacle packages would be next but it looks like work for a metapackage for the releases still needs to be made
15:32:05 <DavidGomez> not sure on the docker image
15:34:14 <noonedeadpunk> oh, these are great news actually
15:35:38 <noonedeadpunk> DavidGomez: do you have some link to the sig handy, or it's not yet officially published?
15:35:43 <DavidGomez> best way to track this would be this mattermost channel https://chat.rockylinux.org/rocky-linux/channels/sig-storage
15:36:03 <noonedeadpunk> ah, I guess I found an answer https://wiki.rockylinux.org/special_interest_groups/current/#active-special-interest-groups
15:36:19 <DavidGomez> +1
15:37:48 <noonedeadpunk> ok, cool thanks for the update!
15:37:52 <DavidGomez> here is where the dist-git is https://git.rockylinux.org/sig/storage/src/ceph-reef peridot build is here https://peridot.build.resf.org/3e8b2892-6b4b-4357-9678-8cfdaf3f752f/packages
15:38:00 <DavidGomez> of course, no problem!
15:39:17 <noonedeadpunk> also it seems to be Rocky 8 for now only
15:40:07 <noonedeadpunk> ok, I guess that's it then for today
15:40:27 <noonedeadpunk> will end the meeting unless there's somebody wants to raise smth
15:44:00 <noonedeadpunk> #endmeeting