15:31:10 #startmeeting openstack-chef 15:31:11 Meeting started Fri Oct 10 15:31:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is markvan. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:31:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:31:14 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_chef' 15:31:36 os-chef-bot: task list 15:31:36 #1 - markvan look up git change log 15:31:36 #2 - j^2 look up how to standardize email maintaining like openstack 15:32:03 Howdy all, meeting time. 15:32:17 @core meeting time! 15:32:17 @core meeting time! 15:32:42 Hey 15:35:14 #topic Review action list 15:35:55 for my action on Changelog, I did find that that other projects have this file generated based upon the git logs 15:36:24 Oh sweet 15:36:26 It's not a bad format, but lacks the version break down we currently have. 15:37:29 So, i'll continue to look into this a bit to understand how the flow works and how it avoids changelog rebase collisions that I have been hitting all the time. 15:38:34 Looks like the solution will be to remove the manual Changelog files from the cookbooks, and instead have them generated at some point. 15:38:45 j^2: and info on email action? 15:38:49 any 15:40:20 Yeah it seems that we should probably just remove email from metadata.rv 15:40:40 No one uses it and few if any are checked 15:41:59 #link https://docs.getchef.com/essentials_cookbook_metadata.html 15:42:16 Looking at the link, I don't see which fields are required or optional. 15:43:26 the base openstack projexts like nova, use author-email = openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org 15:43:31 https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/setup.cfg#L8 15:43:46 So, maybe using our list is not that bad of an idea here. 15:45:13 Eeehhh 15:45:26 That could be a lot of noise 15:45:47 But at the same time we would get eyes on issuse 15:46:32 yup, having it come thru does not sound so bad....might miss things otherwise 15:46:37 But either we stdize or remove. One or the other imo 15:47:44 yup, I vote for the list approach. Maybe put up a patch for Common with that, and we'll get more feedback that way. 15:48:09 Sounds good. I can take that action item 15:48:45 Common and I have an close relationship now a days 15:49:01 ok 15:49:24 #topic General Discussion 15:49:53 Opening this up if anybody has something on their mind... 15:50:06 Leaps and bounds with the testing framework 15:50:23 We talked about it before the meeting though 15:51:19 Yup, maybe add the link to it here again 15:52:03 #link http://GitHub.com/jjasghar/singlestack 15:53:10 I changed the name of the repo too because its not singlestack anymore 15:53:28 But it'll take you to the correct place 15:54:32 I will have to find more time to dig thru this again... 15:55:14 :) just a little longer and we can have real integration tests. 15:56:11 And then with that we can start building swift clusters and all so we can actually see this stuff work. 15:56:24 I'm really excited about this 15:57:18 For feedback on that, where would you like that? github issues? Just looking now, I see a few minor comments I would like to make (can't resist a review opp) 15:58:11 Yeah GitHub issues probably to start. After its GA I was going to give it to stackforge 15:58:33 And ask to deprecate chef-repo 15:59:04 ok, I'll create a single issue with a bunch of minor cleanup comments so you can easily track them. 15:59:33 Awesome :) and if you can I'd love for you to play with it 15:59:33 And yes either replace or merge with chef-repo as they are covering much of the same ground. 16:00:04 yeah, I have to set aside the internal setup I always use and switch to this, hopefully next week. 16:00:25 Sweet 16:02:02 Any other topics for tday, anyone? 16:04:33 Not here :) 16:04:53 #endmeeting