16:01:55 #startmeeting openstack-chef 16:01:57 Meeting started Mon Feb 29 16:01:55 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jklare. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:59 :D 16:02:00 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_chef' 16:02:06 hey everybody 16:02:08 howdy 16:02:12 hi! 16:02:16 ohai 16:02:23 thanks for the the hint with the light sc` :D 16:02:43 :D 16:02:44 any topics you guys have for today? 16:03:09 is the neutron change ready for eyes? 16:03:21 nope, i have more cycles now that I’ve broken past some Chef stuff, so I’m going revisit validating patches 16:03:35 it should be and i am trying to get the integration test running, but jenkins seems to be broken right now 16:03:44 there are a lot of jobs in the queue for more than 10 hours 16:03:49 balancing $DAYJOB is really a variable now-a-days 16:04:24 ok. i think i'm still in the infra channel to follow along in the goings on 16:04:55 i think the only path ready for review right now is the percona one in ops-database 16:05:04 markvan i posted a comment to your change 16:05:09 not sure if this is sufficient 16:05:29 i could not find a better solution for the search pattern used there 16:05:50 ok, besides the open patches: 16:06:01 jklare: k, I'll take a look 16:06:21 alexandre from the ec2-api contacted me again since they finished the refactoring of their cookbook 16:06:28 https://github.com/cloudscaling/cookbook-openstack-ec2 16:06:55 nice 16:07:03 i took a quick look at it and it looks good so far, but still need some patches (header in recipes need to be adapted) and specs 16:07:51 alexandre told me that they will try to continue working on the cookbook, but will have to focus on more important things right now, which might stop the progress for some weeks 16:08:36 so i guess if we want to include the cookbook in this cycle we need to help with the patches (volunteers?) 16:08:52 otherwise we can skip this for now and have a look at it for the next cycle 16:09:25 would be good to have their support, otherwise it's kind of tossing it over the wall 16:10:30 in my opinion we need to focus on getting more of the already supported cookbooks refactored and ready 16:10:41 +1 16:10:49 and priority wise, i think this is more important than adding a new one 16:11:01 there's more than enough higher priority stuff, as nice as this feature is 16:11:03 i think we can still do this in the next cycle 16:11:17 +1, need to stablize what we have first, then add new function 16:11:31 ok cool 16:11:57 btw. did anybody hear anything from zhiwei? he said a while ago that he wanted to work on the orchestration cookbook 16:12:09 not i 16:12:13 i think that would be the next big candidate for refactoring 16:12:24 since imo heat is nearly a core service 16:12:32 booooo 16:12:36 ? 16:12:41 heat boooo 16:12:42 not sure what his status is 16:12:44 :P 16:13:03 i take you do not like heat j^2 ? 16:13:12 heh 16:13:29 I’ve had some issues with it in general, hell i pick chef-provisioning-fog over it any day 16:13:50 i thought someone living in texas could take the heat? :P 16:13:51 heat + ceilometer can do amazing things :D 16:13:55 ouch, I'm spending most of my day right now deep in heat 16:13:59 a lot of stuff chef-provisioning can not 16:14:26 but i would love to see a chef-provisioning + ceilometer integration :D 16:14:32 ha! 16:14:36 sc`: ^ 16:14:49 jklare: that _would_ be interesting 16:15:31 did anybody look at our launchpad recently? 16:15:54 i looked at it a while ago and tried to create a milestone for mitaka 16:16:02 but i think i am missing some permissions 16:16:04 or skill 16:16:08 not sure here 16:16:19 but i think we need to update it 16:16:59 there is a mitaka series on lp 16:16:59 j^2 you are the maintainer mentioned on the overview site 16:17:12 j^2 can you help me out here? 16:17:30 sc` yeah, i created that but i can not do anything with it 16:17:41 can old milestones be renamed? liberty-rc1 is mispelled 16:17:48 yeah drop me a note with exactly what you need and i can make it happen 16:18:10 i think we just need a mitaga series 16:18:13 mitaka 16:18:19 ah 16:18:27 ok, yeah i’ll see if i can get that done right now 16:19:16 as soon as we have that we should try to assign bugs or blueprints to it and try to clean up stuff that does not fit to the refactored cookbooks anymore 16:19:26 or needs to be rephrased to fit 16:19:52 i think markvan already did the cleanup for the open patches 16:19:55 https://launchpad.net/openstack-chef/mitaka 16:20:15 jklare: you should have all the rights you need for it too 16:21:28 j^2 great ty 16:23:54 sc` is the complete centos setup working right now? 16:24:23 allinone works with the snapshot of mitaka packages. i'm going to be testing with mitaka-3 on the next rdo test day 16:24:32 cool 16:24:49 everything that needs to go in is there, until the final package build rolls out to mirror.c.o 16:24:52 do you think we should go for a integration testing on centos nodes in infra? 16:25:06 i was thinking about it 16:25:11 wouldn't be a bad idea 16:25:28 i'll have to see if i have cycles to look at it 16:26:07 if you have enough cycles to take a look at all the errors it can produce i could push a quick patch to create a fitting non-voting job for it :D 16:26:26 sure 16:26:29 great 16:27:18 anything else you guys want to talk about today? 16:27:52 openstack on a cluster of rpi3s using chef? 16:28:43 openstack on arm :D 16:28:50 ha! 16:29:26 i think i'm good as far as topics go 16:32:03 ok cool 16:32:14 thanks for attending and see you around in the channel 16:32:19 #endmeeting