16:01:44 <sc`> #startmeeting openstack-chef
16:01:46 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Mar  7 16:01:44 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc`. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:47 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:50 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_chef'
16:01:54 <sc`> #chair jklare
16:01:55 <openstack> Current chairs: jklare sc`
16:01:58 <jklare> yay
16:02:00 <jklare> :D
16:02:03 <sc`> howdy!
16:02:03 <calbers> o/
16:02:10 <jklare> hi
16:02:51 <sc`> kicked some patches along that needed +wf. there's one that seems to be spinning
16:03:26 <sc`> never mind. zuul status said it's taking a while
16:03:38 <jklare> yeah, i saw that
16:03:50 <jklare> not sure thou if we should just ignore the failing integration tests
16:04:05 <sc`> we should start paying attention to them more closely
16:04:13 <jklare> yeah
16:04:14 <sc`> otherwise, why have them?
16:04:38 <jklare> i think they should work again after merging the openstack-chef-repo one with the fix for the role order in allinone
16:05:08 <jklare> so maybe we should wait until this one is in and then recheck all the remaining ones
16:05:34 <jklare> we also pushed a patch for orchestration
16:05:41 <jklare> which should be good for review
16:06:02 <jklare> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288387/
16:06:26 <sc`> right on. saw that one when i was looking at the open reviews
16:09:24 <jklare> we also have a new and shiny centos7 integration job now
16:09:48 <sc`> yup. that was on my todo list, but E_TIME
16:10:00 <jklare> and i think if we insert a small caseswitch into our bootstrap and rakefile it should start running
16:11:41 <sc`> jklare: i noticed your notes re: chefdk. effectively this means we can't use 0.11.2?
16:11:53 <jklare> sc` not sure about that
16:12:18 <jklare> i played around with it a little bit and ran into an odd error related to the new chef provisioning
16:12:39 <jklare> it might be that this can be fixed with some simple adaptions, but i did not look into that yet
16:12:57 <sc`> ok. i'll have to play around with it too, to see what it's doing
16:13:08 <jklare> apart from that, the new rubocop and foodcritic version will kill all our style and lint tests until we refactor
16:13:39 <sc`> better to do this sort of change now than when mitaka is already cut
16:15:12 <jklare> true
16:17:27 <jklare> but we should start a discussion about the things we want to include before releasing
16:17:32 <jklare> so we can set a date
16:17:45 <jklare> preferably around or during the summit imo
16:18:16 <sc`> yup. makes sense
16:19:13 <sc`> what i'd like to see shipping at a minimum: the remainder of the refactoring and the latest chefdk
16:19:20 <sc`> centos comes in almost for free
16:19:34 <sc`> not much has to be done. even less to do for the GA packages
16:19:46 <jklare> we should be nearly done for the refactoring part
16:20:08 <jklare> for centos we need the integration test to run
16:20:17 <sc`> yeah. integration should be there
16:20:36 <jklare> for the chefdk..
16:20:56 <jklare> somebody will have to fix all the lint and style issues
16:21:07 <sc`> yup. makes sense
16:21:07 <jklare> and look into the local chef-provisioning thingy
16:21:21 <jklare> but i think that should be possible until end of april
16:21:46 <jklare> BUT
16:21:57 <jklare> we also need some mitaka packages for stable/mitaka :D
16:22:30 <sc`> yup. centos packages won't be on mirror.c.o until nearly the summit afaik
16:22:51 <jklare> i think this might be the same for the ubunto ones on trusty
16:22:58 <jklare> be we will see
16:23:40 <sc`> mitaka 3 test day is this week for rdo
16:24:18 <sc`> i'm going to give it a spin in repo and see how it is. should be a nonissue to switch over to those packages based on those results
16:27:53 <jklare> sounds good
16:30:52 <jklare> i have another completely unrelated topic
16:31:04 <jklare> not sure if you saw the mail from tristan this moring?
16:31:41 <sc`> i have not. looking
16:31:52 <jklare> it would be good if anybody would step up as the new ptl for the newton cycle
16:32:17 <sc`> i had mentioned in our channel in passing. was giving it some consideration
16:32:34 <jklare> ok
16:32:41 <sc`> nb: i have no idea what is entailed, but i'd be willing to give it a shot for a cycle
16:33:06 <jklare> sounds great
16:33:24 <jklare> i think since we are a very small project its more about communication to other projects
16:33:30 <jklare> and planning of the summit sessions
16:33:32 <jklare> btw
16:33:53 <jklare> i tried to secure 2 working sessions and one fishbowl sessions for our project during the austin summit
16:34:06 <jklare> hoping that we will at least one of each
16:34:26 <sc`> right on
16:34:31 <jklare> i will keep you posted
16:39:38 <jklare> any other topics you want to talk about?
16:39:50 <sc`> i'm good
16:42:34 <jklare> ok, thanks for attending and see you around
16:42:38 <jklare> #endmeeting