14:00:33 #startmeeting openstack-cyborg 14:00:33 Meeting started Wed Apr 18 14:00:33 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is zhipeng. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:37 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' 14:00:56 #topic Roll Call 14:01:01 #info Howard 14:01:18 #info Li_Liu 14:02:01 #info Melissa Sussmann 14:02:05 #info Helloway 14:03:18 #info Ed Leafe 14:04:34 #info shaohe 14:04:39 hi all 14:05:18 hi shaohe :) 14:07:52 okey guys let's get into business 14:07:58 #topic MS1 preparation 14:08:18 please be aware that this week is the MS1 freeze 14:09:01 which means after this week we will not review any more proposals 14:09:49 there is another target for MS1 which is the community wide goal 14:09:59 #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/rocky/index.html 14:10:27 we've already land a patch on mutable configuration enablement 14:10:41 but I'm not sure about the mox/mox3 removal 14:10:48 anyone volunteer to take a look ? 14:12:01 nova seems to be the only project working on that 14:12:31 Does cyborg use mox? 14:12:38 i'm not sure 14:12:50 let me check it. 14:13:26 thx shaohe_feng_ 14:13:37 check our test files 14:13:38 #info Melissa - sorry I disconnected 14:13:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/mox-removal+(status:open+OR+status:merged 14:13:46 zhipeng: no mox found 14:13:51 no worries melissa :) 14:14:00 shaohe_feng_ oh great then :) 14:14:16 we've accomplished the community goal then 14:14:58 #info this week is MS1 freeze for all spec proposal 14:15:32 #info should try to land those already heavily discussed patches 14:17:30 #topic bug report on storyboard 14:17:53 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/77 14:18:23 zhipeng: just spec ready this week? no need for patches? 14:19:02 shaohe_feng_ yes, we should try to land as many mature specs as possible this week 14:19:24 do we have a link of spec? 14:19:45 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/cyborg 14:20:23 okey coming back to the bug report 14:20:29 the first one 14:20:36 #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001827 14:22:13 zhipeng: still can not work? 14:22:21 zhipeng: how to reproduce it? 14:23:00 i'm asking the author to join irc right now :) 14:23:01 zhipeng: OK, mutil-host 14:23:17 zhipeng: we does not try multi-host. 14:23:36 MULTI_HOST=False 14:24:18 zhipeng: got it. 14:24:36 more details more easy to fix it. 14:26:18 yes I was just saying that to the author 14:27:06 ok I just reviewed kosamara's bug report 14:27:09 i think it is related 14:27:23 maybe we should not have a enable_service cyborg 14:27:32 since there is no cyborg service 14:27:56 let me re-paste kosamara's report 14:28:12 zhipeng: enable cyborg plugin? 14:28:22 Hi! I was trying cyborg in devstack again. At some point devstack is checking if every service is running and 2 things related to cyborg occur: 14:29:28 * zhipengh[m] sent a long message: zhipengh[m]_2018-04-18_14:29:28.txt 14:30:02 .... 14:30:25 Guest52678 we are reviewing another bug report 14:30:31 which might be related to yours 14:30:39 zhipeng: does the author enable cyborg plugin? 14:30:53 shaohe_feng_ i don't think so 14:31:16 zhipeng: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001827 the link just enable service. 14:31:31 I remember Jinghan or someone provided a localrc file or something like that before 14:31:38 Hi .. Yes i have enabled cyborg services 14:31:51 But still it was failing 14:32:02 #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/ym8eEtMcHQjEWeLSkT0F/ 14:32:07 it should enable both service and plugin 14:32:24 I think another reason is my enable mutable config patch 14:32:49 ERROR cyborg TypeError: launch_service() got an unexpected keyword argument 'restart_method' 14:32:55 Hi Zhipeng, i got the same type of error msg 14:32:58 i will take a look into that 14:33:02 like the link you provided 14:33:21 Guest52678 yeah I probably know what triggers it lol 14:33:44 good 14:33:53 #link https://review.openstack.org/559303 14:35:02 Guest52678 the solution is three fold I guess: (1)remove cyborg from enable_service(2)add cyborg plugin in the enable_service(3) wait for my patch on the restart_method error 14:36:15 ok 14:36:38 thx for the bug report :) 14:36:54 I would otherwise has no clue about the problem I introduced 14:37:33 okey let's move on 14:37:44 #topic Rocky Critical Spec Review 14:37:59 now let's start from the mature ones 14:38:15 #info Sundar's sched spec 14:38:18 #link https://review.openstack.org/554717 14:38:30 shaohe_feng_ Li_Liu looks good to you guys ? 14:38:35 edleaf 14:38:50 edleafe sorry 14:40:54 Overall looks good to me. But I think Jay's most recently comment still needs to be addressed 14:41:01 okey 14:41:30 shouldn't be a big change 14:42:21 #info programming spec 14:42:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/559395 14:42:33 zhipeng: sorry, on a call 14:42:42 zhipeng: I'll review it today 14:42:47 edleafe no problem :) thx man 14:43:51 Guest18705 are you around ? 14:44:06 I think you or chuck should help review the programming spec 14:44:13 zhipeng: looks good to me. 14:44:34 altho Li_Liu should have more than enough exprience on Xilinx FPGA :) 14:46:14 okey next 14:46:25 #info bitstream metadata standardization 14:46:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/558265 14:46:28 zhipeng: about the fpga reconfigure spec, should we put that in for R? or we wait for future? 14:46:41 I mentioned in the community email last week 14:46:48 Li_Liu I doubt we have enough bandwidth on that 14:46:57 ok, great 14:47:00 don't forget to reply to Jay's comment :) 14:47:30 Sure, but hope Sundar can provide some insights as well 14:47:39 for Jay's comment I mean 14:47:39 of course 14:48:21 ok, I will take a look at the programming spec 14:48:22 I guess metadata still needs Sundar's further review 14:48:31 hey thx chucksong 14:48:38 also the metadata one I just mentioned :) 14:49:17 sure 14:49:24 #info quota spec still needs more work 14:49:38 #info will need Sundar to present on the new agent-driver api spec 14:49:52 okey I think that was we could do for today 14:50:13 #topic other open patches 14:50:31 #info object/api implementation for vf/pf 14:50:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/552734 14:50:47 I think this looks great now 14:51:09 shaohe_feng_ could you help workflow+1 it ? 14:51:11 good to see this patch can be merged. Will have another follow up patch 14:51:26 Li_Liu lol 14:51:33 zhipeng: yes 14:51:41 shaohe_feng_ could you try the patch after it merged? 14:52:55 Li_Liu: yes. 14:53:02 will try 14:53:16 okey gr8t 14:53:35 #topic AoB 14:53:45 any other business ? 14:54:03 what is AoB? 14:54:40 same question for me 14:55:00 any other business 14:55:04 any other topics 14:55:07 :) 14:55:55 zhipeng: client? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560400/ 14:56:47 Li_Liu just workflow+1 it :) 14:56:54 thanks a lot :) 14:57:06 i mean plz workflow+1 that patch 14:57:16 not just cr+2 :P 14:57:24 zhipeng: will add openstackclient plugin and httpclient code later. 14:57:42 sounds great shaohe 14:57:45 just did 14:58:19 zhipeng: maybe a example cmd. such as: cyborg accelerator list 14:59:14 oh yes exactly 15:03:14 btw the first week of may I will be traveling to KubeCon EU 15:03:25 and will socialize cyborg with the k8s community 15:03:37 g8t 15:03:38 if you guys have any design ideas, plz feel free to share it 15:03:50 at the moment I only had discussion with Sundar 15:04:03 and looks like a CRD controller might be the patch 15:04:06 EU, which country? 15:04:07 path... 15:04:11 Danmark 15:04:32 interested to see their reactions on Cyborg 15:04:55 yes if we were to propose an incubation project something like kube-cyborg 15:05:06 would be a very intersting idea :P 15:05:33 anyways, still two weeks away, feel free to chime in 15:05:55 zhipeng: sounds good 15:06:42 okey if no AoB 15:06:48 let's conclude the meeting todday 15:06:50 today 15:06:54 ok 15:06:58 thx everyone for participating 15:07:05 #endmeeting