15:01:14 #startmeeting openstack-helm 15:01:14 Meeting started Tue Feb 5 15:01:14 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is portdirect. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:15 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:17 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_helm' 15:01:25 #topic rollcall 15:01:34 o/ 15:01:36 lets give it 5 mins for people to arrive 15:01:40 hello 15:02:06 Agenda is here, add away: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-helm-meeting-2019-02-05 15:02:21 o/ 15:06:05 ok - lets go 15:06:11 #topic how to deliver and deploy kernel modules needed by a container? 15:06:16 srwilkers: this is yours 15:06:22 nope, that's not me 15:06:33 it was my question 15:06:39 oh - sorry! 15:06:47 it comes up in the contesxt of running DPDK 15:07:28 so in the etherpad i mentioned how we are doing this today 15:07:30 I saw the init container but misunderstood that the module needs to reside on the host, not the container 15:07:42 yeah - thats a gap in this approach for sure 15:07:59 in that we dont attempt to install modules - just load them 15:08:03 * mattmceuen o/ sorry I'm late 15:08:05 makes, sense. Now I need to figure out how to get the kernel modules on the host OS. 15:08:14 DPDK delivered with 16.04 is quite old 15:08:26 this is where having mattmceuen about helps :) 15:08:28 and I´d like to make use of a newer version 15:08:46 as i assume your q is in the context of airship? 15:08:55 might be more an Airship question, not openstack-helm 15:09:04 its both for sure 15:09:06 right, I can take this to the airship channel 15:09:23 ty georgk, I'm catching up :) let's discuss there 15:09:29 in osh - we say you can load modules, but getting them there is out of scope (up to a point) 15:09:43 but things like minimirror should help cloase that gap quickly 15:09:56 ok 15:10:16 mattmceuen: not sure if you have any info to hand about loading custom repos etc? 15:11:51 absolutely - there is some airship scope on the cusp to help with this! 15:12:24 I ´ll catch mattmceuen in the airship channel after this meeting 15:12:48 nice - thanks guys - though rememebr mini-mirror can be use outside of airship as well :) 15:12:59 I'm looking forward to seeing rpm support for sure. 15:13:14 ok lets move on 15:13:23 #topic Docs TOC draft 15:13:58 so as we discussed last week - I've boshed together a very rough draft for an, ahem, idealised set of docs for osh 15:14:07 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634944/1/doc/source/index.rst 15:14:36 lets get some eyes on this - at this stage, lets concentrate on the content, rather than rst formatting etc 15:14:57 and once its developed a bit we can start to flesh out the supporting structure behind it 15:15:20 sounds good 15:15:24 in particular it would be great to get the eyes of people new to OSH on these 15:15:50 so we can try to get a structure in place that helps people enagage both in the project, but also use its deliverables. 15:16:38 +1 15:18:17 i know its a quite meeting this week - so lets move on, but I'll also bring this up in irc etc for those that are not here today 15:18:33 #topic K8S slack #openstack-helm channel 15:19:08 so for a long time we have been in the wonderful position of having a dedicated slack channel given to use by the CNCF in their k8s slack 15:19:43 we have been as custodians, and to put it bluntly, bad citizens there 15:19:57 the channel has over 500 active memebers 15:20:13 who have done a wonderful job of self organising and supporting each other 15:20:22 that's really unfortunate 15:20:23 sorry to lay down the hammer like this 15:20:45 but I think at a minimum, all cores in OSH should be present in that channel 15:20:50 is there no longer the possibility of syncing both chats anymore? 15:20:58 and we need to provide some support to its memebers 15:21:20 not that im aware of atm - though I'm gonna try to find some infra to set up a bridge 15:21:47 will do portdirect, sad to say I didn't realize the need was there 15:22:13 also genuinely curious -- why not try and direct them here? i feel supporting two distinct chats is going to not only be difficult to do, but will result in potential missed messages between users who only use one 15:22:30 which of course, a bridge solves that 15:22:47 honestly - the numbers suggest if a shift were to occur that it would make sense to move our primary channel from irc to slack 15:23:15 but as thats got its own challenges - i think a bridge is the long term solution 15:23:34 it is 15:23:50 in simple terms - we have 66 people in IRC and 567 in slack at this point in time 15:24:02 is there any way to at least post a channel message that informs them of our weekly meetings at a minimum? i think getting them engaged in that alone adds immense value 15:24:15 im working with the slack admins atm 15:24:17 okay 15:24:23 i expect that in place by EOD :) 15:24:30 cool 15:25:35 ok - lets move on 15:25:51 #topic Parkinglot 15:26:03 anything else people want to discuss this week? 15:27:16 Hi, new to this channel. I was wondering where to enter topics for this meeting. Upstream agenda link shows old meetings only.. 15:27:17 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-helm-meeting-agenda 15:28:44 arunkant: typically they'll be posted in the #openstack-helm channel at some point before the meeting begins 15:29:19 arunkant: we use the format: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-helm-meeting-YYYY-MM-DD 15:29:36 we should update that doc to reflect this 15:31:04 okay. So should I add the topics to that etherpad or just somehow specify to IRC openstack-helm channel ? 15:31:26 arunkant: feel free to add to it 15:31:38 Might be valuable to just start creating the etherpad for the following weeks meeting at the end of each weekly meeting 15:31:48 anything you want to bring up this week? we have another 30 mins 15:31:52 good point srwilkers 15:31:57 portdirect: okay. 15:33:11 portdirect: Yes, I have review around adding changes related to another distro support in keystone service, specifically around opensuse based image. 15:33:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/633847/ 15:33:43 ah yes! 15:33:51 really cool to see this work 15:34:05 are there opensuse images avalible? 15:34:20 I want to see how to approach this common problem which we will see when we need to support distros other than default ubuntu .. 15:34:34 i think we should look to adress this properly so we can make thinks like opensuse a 1st class citizen in osh 15:34:41 yup 15:34:57 to me it seems this should come in phases 15:35:07 Agreed - this will be pretty exciting to flesh out 15:35:07 we should get a spec up for multiple-distro support 15:35:12 ++ 15:35:21 portdirect: yes, there are loci images available 15:35:27 and then get some images to use (and build them in zuul) 15:36:17 arunkant: we need to get this pushing dockerhub: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-helm-images/blob/master/openstack/loci/build.sh 15:36:50 the most important thing i think - is that we are able to gate on non-ubuntu images 15:37:02 but this should be articulated in the spec 15:37:11 would you be able to take on writing it? 15:37:16 portdirect: yes, I think evrardjp is working on it. 15:37:51 great - look forward to seeing a ps for it 15:38:42 looking at the ps you have - i think if we own the apache config a bit more - then the only diff required will be to specify the apache config we want to use 15:39:10 which means we wont need to toggle on params to use the default config locations between distros 15:39:14 portdirect: Okay..will circle back on spec aspect of this. Just curious, what are thoughts on how support for multiple distros need to be handled. 15:39:46 1) spec, 2) images, 3) gates 15:40:20 portdirect: okay :) .. then I should get that spec working.. 15:40:24 the only things i think we will see distro specific issues with are services that use apache 15:40:42 up until late last year i was mostly using centos personally 15:40:57 with the exeption of keystone and nova-placement 15:43:14 portdirect: I can see cinder may have some issues as well as expected storage binaries location might be different. 15:43:51 roger 15:44:09 though that should be just a case of rootwrap and cinder.conf over-rides? 15:45:03 portdirect: yes, might be. I recall seeing cinder error with suse image locally..need to investigate further. 15:45:19 nice 15:45:29 would be great to see the work suse is doing here 15:45:49 protdirect: thanks. Will work on getting spec out. That's it from me about this topic. 15:48:03 ok - any other topics? 15:48:28 nothing from me -- been a quiet week for me 15:49:21 ok - lets wrap up - thanks everybody :D 15:49:26 #endmeeting