13:00:50 #startmeeting openstack-salt 13:00:51 Meeting started Tue Apr 12 13:00:50 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jasondotstar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:55 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_salt' 13:00:58 #topic roll call 13:01:01 o/ 13:01:11 hello \o 13:01:23 GM cznewt 13:06:11 anyone else? 13:06:17 otherwise let's move on 13:06:27 #topic Introduction 13:06:33 This meeting is for the openstack-salt team 13:06:41 if you're interested in contributing to the discussion, please join #openstack-salt 13:06:54 meetings are Weekly on Tuesdays at 1300UTC 13:07:10 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Salt_Team_Meeting 13:07:19 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-salt 13:07:40 #topic Review past action items 13:07:57 meeting etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-salt-weekly-meeting-20160412 13:08:00 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-salt-weekly-meeting-20160412 13:08:08 genunix to start the RPM packaging spec 13:08:21 o/ 13:08:28 hi genunix 13:08:32 any updates here? 13:08:38 just a little 13:09:09 I am investigating debian packaging for openstack and trying to reach debian-openstack team and ask them for some guidance 13:09:25 and there's the salt packaging business 13:09:43 (OFTC/#debian-openstack) 13:10:40 genunix: +1. I'm doing the same on the RPM side. 13:10:44 I have some idea on how to do it but we still need some Debian mentor 13:10:48 +1 13:11:15 I also hope we can talk with people around packaging on Openstack summit. 13:12:03 +1 this is one of the priorities 13:12:14 indeed 13:12:29 this sort of dovetails on mine agenda item: 13:12:29 jasondotstar to reach out to dirk (RPM-packaging team) to discuss RPM packaging 13:12:39 I have reached out to the RPM-packaging team 13:13:47 they will be assisting us in a couple different things 13:13:57 1- using their RPM spec templates 13:14:20 to create RPMs for RPM distros we are targeting 13:14:58 SUSE, CentOS, Fedora 13:15:04 all have small differences 13:15:19 that need to be addressed in the spec files 13:15:27 so there's that 13:17:40 2) we have to decide where the 'source' is going to be hosted 13:17:51 in other words 13:18:22 we may have to leverage a 3rd party CI 13:18:30 for build/test 13:19:00 so having the source (perhaps) HTTP accessible to the 3rd party CI would be important 13:19:18 the RPM packaging team uses the SUSE CI pipeline for building RPMs atm. 13:19:32 they are willing help us leverage this same CI. 13:19:42 questions, comments? 13:22:56 ok moving on 13:23:05 jasondotstar to follow up on how we run integration/functional tests that incorporate multi-node services 13:23:10 no updates on this one yet. 13:23:17 #action jasondotstar to follow up on how we run integration/functional tests that incorporate multi-node services 13:23:25 last one: 13:23:26 cznewt to prepare the BoF session presentation slides for review with the team 13:25:11 cznewt: any status here? 13:25:58 if not, we'll move on to today's agenda 13:26:19 #topic Today's Agenda 13:26:45 3rd Party Vendor Support 13:26:52 so I've got a question here 13:27:21 I don't have pprogess on that one 13:27:23 what's the team's take on how we are going to support 3rd party vendors 13:27:27 cznewt: no worries 13:27:33 I 'm preparing another presentation 13:28:54 no prob, we can move it up 13:29:12 if we can get a look at it prior to summit, that'd be a win 13:29:34 #action cznewt to continue prepping the BoF presentation slides for summit 13:30:14 yes I'll get it ready till the next week 13:30:23 so the reason why I'm asking about third party vendor support in our salt formulas is b/c F5 Networks 13:30:31 has reached out to me directly 13:30:36 about this. 13:31:49 this is the first group that has reached out to us 13:32:12 specifically about salt formulas for integrating BIG-IP devices 13:32:25 with OpenStack 13:32:36 i'd like to hear the team's thoughts on this.... 13:34:16 cznewt, genunix ^^ 13:34:20 any thoughts around this? 13:35:11 hmm, not much. What's the difference in 3rd party vendors and other contributors? 13:35:35 well, F5 is willing to support us 13:35:47 give us licenses and dev/test VMs 13:35:55 Ah, didn't know 13:36:05 so that we can do the work that's needed 13:36:39 i think saying that you can use our salt formulas to integrate F5 devices into your OpenStack deployments is a win for us 13:36:46 i guess it 13:37:03 would be like Cisco and Juniper integration with neutron 13:37:12 yes indeed, I've seen already some salt f5 integrations somewhere 13:37:27 right, they have begun to open source their stuff 13:37:51 https://docs.saltstack.com/en/latest/ref/states/all/salt.states.bigip.html 13:38:14 we could just whap this in formula with proper metadata 13:38:22 http://github.com/f5networks 13:38:28 cznewt: +1 13:38:37 they know have a Python SDK 13:38:44 *now 13:39:06 as well 13:39:18 anyway, this is something that can work directly with them on. 13:39:27 they are offering support to us for it. 13:40:09 ok we can talk more about this in chan. 13:40:35 we can figure out how to move forward if we think this is a worthy cause 13:40:42 here's another topic: 13:40:43 Yash's blueprint (support the salt formula for "Keystone" till Liberty release) 13:40:54 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/salt-formula-keystone/+spec/yash-agarwal 13:41:42 any background info on this one? 13:42:45 nothing unfortunately 13:42:55 Hoped that anyone here will have more info :-) 13:44:08 I think it's somehow connected with keystonev3 support 13:44:37 and Yash's refactor to use python-openstack instead of python-keystone 13:45:26 He posted url with his changes some time ago in #openstack-salt 13:45:33 genunix: +1 13:46:10 honestly, i'd have to take a look to see what this is..... i have no idea :-/ 13:46:25 but I'll take your word for it :-) 13:49:07 ok 13:49:25 we've got a couple reviews up: 13:50:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/304436 - config files to support lvm driver 13:50:27 I'm looking over that one 13:50:38 #link https://review.openstack.org/304472 - parameterized mq 13:50:43 cznewt: +1 13:51:08 yes, I'm handling these, but they're stuck in my internal queue :D 13:51:23 cznewt: cool. 13:51:28 but I'll process them 2day 13:51:32 #topic Open Discussion 13:51:44 at the end we'll have full Mitaka support 13:51:52 cznewt: \o/ 13:52:12 ok any last thoughts before we close? 13:53:23 about the f5, how we can start the cooperation process? 13:54:04 can we setup 13:54:09 I've got a direct contact 13:54:17 with one of their solution architects 13:54:42 yes, I'm wandering on how to fit this into the deployment scenarios 13:54:49 we can meet with him directly 13:55:10 yes, when/where summit? 13:55:20 he will be at summit 13:55:29 I'll introduce you two :-) 13:56:03 we can also have a call w/ them as well. 13:57:09 y this would be perfect 13:57:55 :-) 13:57:56 cool 13:58:11 ok any last thoughts? 13:59:30 not for me, I'll send link to presentation to our channel 13:59:46 +1 13:59:48 thanks all 14:00:00 #endmeeting