15:00:27 #startmeeting openstack search 15:00:28 Meeting started Thu Sep 29 15:00:27 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sjmc7. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:31 The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_search' 15:00:41 o/ 15:00:48 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/search-team-meeting-agenda 15:00:48 o/ 15:00:50 morning folks 15:00:51 o/ 15:00:58 o/ 15:01:15 o/ 15:01:23 o/ 15:01:46 #topic Newton release status 15:01:56 the RC2 tag just got approved 15:02:04 rosmaita: the api-ref doc made it in, so thankyou! 15:02:04 yay! 15:02:21 sjmc7: thanks to RickA-HP , sjmc7 , and TravT 15:02:24 barring any earth-shattering bugs anyone finds, that’ll be the final RC 15:02:35 \o/ 15:02:39 I guess I can go back to sleep now! 15:02:42 It is pretty awesome to finally have a 1.0! 15:03:37 yes! we fixed loads of issues this cycle, so thanks everyone for the hard work 15:04:06 master’s open for business on Ocata and we’ll be back to reviewing stuff more frequently again 15:04:23 moving on… 15:04:26 #topic Ocata features 15:04:26 i've got 2 api-ref related issues to mention 15:04:37 oh, ok - go ahead 15:04:40 sorry 15:04:46 i need to slow my roll :) 15:05:02 yeah, so probably need a patch to say version 1.0 CURRENT somewhere 15:05:10 will have to look at some of the other api-ref to see where 15:05:19 on master? 15:05:28 and then a patch to api-site to include the Search API in the list of api-refs 15:05:43 sjmc7: yeah, the published docs are all from master 15:06:05 ok. i should familiarise myself with how that works 15:06:10 this patch is similar to what needs to happen for the api-site: 15:06:20 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374978/ 15:06:37 ok, will take a look 15:06:49 the docs are a weird situation 15:07:16 the "live" ones on the openstack.org are all published from master 15:08:07 anyway, i can do another patch like that, or let someone else do it to see what's up 15:08:10 and i can consult 15:08:18 (that's all from me, sorry for interrupting) 15:08:19 i should probably do it so i know what’s going on 15:08:29 no, interrupt away :) 15:08:47 it’s getting cold, my fingers get creaky in the winter so someone else typing is good :) 15:09:09 sjmc7: just ping me in irc, i can show you the publishing job and also what to do about this patch 15:09:17 okey doke 15:09:49 for Ocata: the only two big-ish things i know about are the ironic patch and the publisher/pipeline architectural change 15:10:02 might want to #topic that 15:10:39 if anybody has any feature requests or desires, either file a BP or bring it up in the meetings or IRC 15:11:01 it’s good if we can get stuff added before the summit since the summit comes pretty far into the development cycle 15:11:08 the glare guys ativelkov and mike fedosin had reached out to us and were interested 15:11:17 about Glare? 15:11:27 yeah, doing a glare plugin... 15:11:40 gb21 had expressed interest in working with them... 15:11:42 cool 15:11:42 ok. that’ll be interesting given their data model 15:12:01 i’ll maybe get in touch with them once the newton rush has died down 15:12:11 hey 15:12:18 oh, even better :) 15:12:21 hi mike! 15:12:25 o/ %) 15:12:26 yeah, I work with Geetika 15:12:31 Gb21 15:12:47 ok, great 15:12:59 we had several questions about glare plugin implementation 15:12:59 let us know if you need any additional help 15:13:20 because we have dynamic structure for artifacts 15:13:36 but Travis's already told me how to cope with it 15:13:42 splendid! 15:14:09 I think I'll stop by in your irc channel tomorrow 15:14:12 if you want to put up a proof of concept patch so we can look at the approach, that’d be fine, doesn’t need to be complete 15:14:14 yeah, please do 15:14:25 BTW, we are probably going to have a searclite plugin for murano as well 15:14:29 when I hava more concrete questions 15:14:36 ah, that’d be good to ativelkov 15:14:39 too 15:15:06 we are adding metadef support right now. Once it lands, will think about indexint it 15:15:31 ok. yeah, just let us know. early in the cycle is definitely better, especially given Ocata’s a shorter one 15:16:39 thanks folks, SL is really amazing project that suppose to make our life easier :) 15:16:47 that’s the goal :) 15:16:47 :) 15:17:01 if there aren’t already i’ll file BPs for both of those 15:17:09 ativelkov: mfedosin: i'm really pretty excited about the aggregations capabilities provided by ES 15:17:17 there might be some interesting things you can do with that... 15:17:42 TravT: I am still wondering about that hierarchycal queries I told you about 15:18:00 i had some thoughts on that... 15:18:15 but have been going in too many directions 15:18:27 will you be at the summit? 15:18:39 Yup 15:18:57 So we can have a discussion there 15:18:58 okay, maybe we could do a session / half a session on that 15:19:08 sjmc7 will get to that shortly. 15:19:13 in our agenda 15:19:25 i will! 15:19:35 anything else anybody wants to bring up for stuff to try to get into Ocata? 15:20:19 i may want to add aodh and ceilometer plugin 15:20:51 Kevin_Zheng: that'd be cool 15:21:01 but not sure time is enough 15:21:01 ok. we started looking at monasca too, which might go along with that 15:21:33 yingjun: You will be trying to get the notifications done for server groups, hypervisors, flavors, right? 15:22:06 i added bp for sg and flovor 15:22:06 flavor 15:22:32 we’ll have to keep an eye on the versioned notifications for nova, too 15:22:42 not approved yet 15:22:44 i’ll start attending their meetings again 15:23:29 cant attend due to timezone problem 15:23:46 that’s understandable :) 15:24:01 ok, moving on unless there’s anything else? 15:24:50 #topic Ocata summit 15:24:57 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/searchlight-ocata-summit 15:25:37 sadly i will not be able to attend for personal reasons, so TravT will be running the sessions on my behalf 15:25:53 sjmc7, can you attend remotely at least? 15:26:08 i know that is hard to do, but if possible, we should try to do it 15:26:29 yeah, i’ll do my best 15:27:14 i can bellow unintelligably through a speaker phone 15:27:46 i added some suggestions - if folks could take a look and see if there’s anything there they’re interested in or add other topics, that would be great 15:28:08 can brainstorm a bit here too 15:28:13 i added a few 15:28:22 yeah, i was going to add aggregations but i see you got there first 15:28:33 maybe we can knock something together similar to the image count patch 15:28:52 as an example of being able to kind of dynamically patch horizon to add aggregation info 15:30:23 sjmc7 that would be really cool to do 15:31:05 things like that could help drive adoption not just in horizon but elsewhere; lots of people have their own dashboards and CLI tools 15:31:08 wonder how long it'd take to build an overview-like page 15:33:16 i don’t know how much to keep hammering on improving notifications. for the most part we’re ok 15:33:33 nova’s still fiddly and neutron’s got some inconsistencies though they have been fixing issues that i’ve filed as bugs 15:33:50 have you had any chance to reach out to gibi_ 15:33:51 ? 15:33:52 it’s not a particularly exciting topic for anyone 15:33:56 no, not recently 15:34:08 seems like we need to specifically touch base with him 15:34:27 yeah. they were still going in the other direction (where the notifications are deltas) last time i checked 15:35:25 i have done some testing at scale and under load though, and indexing seems reliable 15:35:41 even where there are notifications processed simultaneously or out of order, the versioning handles it ok 15:36:31 any other topics suggestions? 15:36:56 when do they have to be finalized TravT ? 15:37:06 sjmc7 i don't think i know... 15:38:14 i'd guess perhaps by end of next week 15:38:27 need a vote on topics? 15:38:31 ok. i’ll try to find out. at some point it has to go into the magic scheduling thing 15:38:54 yep. 15:38:55 lei-zh: if people add +1s on the etherpad, we can look again next week (assuming we have til then) 15:39:26 voting’s a bit hard with a big list of options 15:40:17 we’ve got a fair amount of time allocated so i think we’ll be able to get through anything anyone wants to 15:40:56 yeah, let's do the +1 thing 15:41:04 and finalize next week. 15:41:50 if there’s nothing else on this, i didn’t have any other topics to discuss 15:41:55 #topic open discussion 15:42:17 anything else anyone wants to bring up, go for it 15:42:45 otherwise we’ll call it and let the folks in the pacific timezones go to sleep 15:43:24 bye 15:43:25 Zzz 15:43:40 :) ok. please vote on summit topics, especially if you’ll be there but even if you won’t 15:44:11 thanks everyone! good night/morning/afternoon 15:44:23 thanks! 15:44:24 night:) 15:44:32 #endmeeting