15:00:37 <sjmc7> #startmeeting openstack search
15:00:38 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Oct 12 15:00:37 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sjmc7. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:39 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:41 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_search'
15:00:58 <sjmc7> and hello again
15:01:08 <lei-zh> hello
15:01:37 <sjmc7> not sure who’ll be here today. travis i think is busy with various things
15:01:45 <sjmc7> i did have a couple of things
15:02:26 <sjmc7> #topic failing builds
15:03:04 <sjmc7> something changed in the build job config on october 6th
15:03:26 <sjmc7> the requirements-check job started failing (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494923/ patchset 82)
15:03:46 <yingjun> hi
15:03:47 <sjmc7> rosmaita: your ear is much closer to the ground than mine
15:04:07 <rosmaita> looking
15:04:09 <sjmc7> i know the zuul v3/v2 thing’s been going on - do you know if this could be related?
15:04:25 <sjmc7> failure is “SystemError: fatal: Not a git repository “
15:04:32 <sjmc7> during “ /tmp/tmpRruDsS/venv/bin/pip install /home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack/requirements"
15:07:17 <rosmaita> (i actually am looking)
15:07:50 <sjmc7> :)
15:08:14 <lei-zh> so it's still a zuul v2 reported error
15:08:23 <rosmaita> we should probably just let it sit another week
15:08:49 <rosmaita> there's something going on about the mirrors being messed up
15:08:59 <sjmc7> ok
15:09:16 <sjmc7> i’ll keep checking. it’s been going on i think longer than the recent troubles though
15:09:21 <sjmc7> do you have a similar job on glance?
15:09:46 <rosmaita> looks like it was passing for a while, though
15:09:49 <rosmaita> like ps 83
15:10:57 <sjmc7> yeah. possible it was something in the patchset, which is more worrying
15:11:40 <sjmc7> doesn’t look like it though
15:11:46 <sjmc7> ok, i’ll sit on it a bit longer
15:11:59 <jokke_> sjmc7: there has been at least repo sync issues Infra has been battling with
15:12:47 <sjmc7> yeah.. it might be that. i’m fine leaving it for a while, it’s not urgent. i just couldn’t figure out a reason it would have broken (or even where it is breaking), and didn’t see any messages about it on the ML
15:12:51 <jokke_> and some other recent problems which for example prevented the second run for zuul v3 yesterday ... so they might be related
15:14:43 <sjmc7> okey doke
15:14:59 <sjmc7> the other thing was..
15:15:02 <sjmc7> #topic policy in code
15:16:01 <sjmc7> there’s a push to move policy into code so that it’s not required to have default policy files
15:16:54 <sjmc7> that seems sensible and has lots of upsides, but seems like it will affect projects like horizon and searchlight that use some elements of other services’ policy files
15:17:07 <lei-zh> like nova?
15:17:11 <sjmc7> not sure if it’s necessarily something for us to worry about
15:17:36 <sjmc7> yeah.. we support reading in policy files for other projects and have some defaults if they’re not there
15:17:47 <sjmc7> so we might just be ok as-is
15:18:32 <robcresswell> Its pretty trivial to generate policy files from the code + customisations via oslo policy iirc.
15:18:42 <robcresswell> So it shouldn't be a blocking issue for consumption
15:18:42 <rosmaita> what robcresswell said
15:18:59 <robcresswell> :D
15:19:04 <sjmc7> ok. i guess we will at a minimum need to convert our own skimpy policy file into a code version
15:19:32 <sjmc7> but otherwise sounds like it won’t be a huge deal
15:21:33 <sjmc7> #topic open discussion
15:21:37 <sjmc7> that was it for agenda thingies
15:21:41 <sjmc7> anyone else have anything?
15:24:22 <sjmc7> don’t all speak at once!
15:24:52 <lei-zh> twice : )
15:25:10 <sjmc7> ok, if nothing else i’ll call it. always available in the searchlight channel if something comes up
15:25:12 <sjmc7> thanks folks
15:26:52 <sjmc7> #endmeeting