19:00:44 <dtroyer> #startmeeting OpenStackClient
19:00:45 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Mar 12 19:00:44 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dtroyer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:46 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
19:00:49 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'openstackclient'
19:01:07 <dtroyer> so, first of all my apologies for getting the time wrong
19:01:18 <dtroyer> stevemar and I had a nice conversation ;)
19:01:43 <lhcheng> 18:06:19 <stevemar> dst times were screwing me up
19:01:45 <lhcheng> lol
19:02:19 <dtroyer> #topic recap
19:02:41 <dtroyer> the outstanding action was for me to submit the project proposal, done
19:03:36 <dtroyer> jogo mentioned that we didn't actually elect me as PTL, so we'll give a week for anyone to want to run and decide next week if we need to have an election
19:04:33 <dtroyer> I will have a list of contributors within the last year (actual date tbd) ready by then
19:05:53 <dtroyer> #topic release plans
19:06:53 <dtroyer> I'd like the next release to be 1.1.0 and include some of the new stuff we've been working on.
19:08:10 <lhcheng> dtroyer: do we have a date for that? or depends on the time when we get to finish the big features?
19:08:25 <stevemar> lhcheng, lets try to keep the average of 1 month up
19:08:26 <dtroyer> that includes —os-cloud support and some neutron support, particularly the bits that overlap with nova-net
19:08:56 <stevemar> its a lot of stuff, but with rc time around the bend we should have more time
19:09:09 <dtroyer> I was thinking this might wind up being close to Kilo timeframe, not sure
19:09:09 <lhcheng> sounds good
19:09:30 <stevemar> also we said that the latest release didn't break anything yay!
19:10:24 <dtroyer> dhellmann has a proposal for library releases that call for a minor bunp around the integrated release to facillitate stable branching.  I'm not sure that we need to do that but I don't see a reason not to
19:10:52 <lhcheng> stevemar: \o/
19:11:29 <dhellmann> dtroyer: yeah, I'd have to think more about it but it seems easy enough to do that maybe spending too much timing thinking would be a waste of effort :-)
19:11:34 <dtroyer> also cinder v2 needs to get going soon, we don't want to get caught wihtout that when v1 goes away
19:12:23 <dtroyer> but I don't think we will wait on v2 for the next release
19:13:04 <dtroyer> anyhting else on releases?
19:13:52 <terrylhowe> sorry, I was late, was there any neutron release discussion
19:14:30 <dtroyer> terrylhowe: specifically about getting the overlapping bits between neutron and nova-net worked out so the same commands (as much as possible) do both
19:14:50 <terrylhowe> ah, cool, that is a bit tricky
19:15:18 <dtroyer> yeah…  if not implementation we need to do the command formats.
19:15:43 <dtroyer> I did do a POC for that and it seems to be workable re a single command class deciding who to call automatically
19:16:57 <dtroyer> also, I want to start working on a caching layer… dhellmann would love tyour feedback on the first cut I put up last night in https://review.openstack.org/163699.  It's basically doing the ClientManager approach with a bunch of dogpile caches
19:17:00 <stevemar> bah, impromptu meeting
19:17:35 <dhellmann> dtroyer: added to my review list
19:17:50 <dtroyer> I might be all wet there but ClientManager has been nicely extensible that it seemed like a good model to follow
19:18:48 <dtroyer> stevemar: do you want to go over the repo split stuff?  or just let the log speak to that?
19:19:07 <dtroyer> since it wasn't really a decision point
19:19:38 <terrylhowe> I think stevemar is afk
19:19:57 <dtroyer> maybe…
19:20:16 <dtroyer> #topic other repos
19:20:38 <dtroyer> we didn't ttalk about cliff or os-client-config earleir, anythign to address for either of those?
19:21:21 <dhellmann> dtroyer: I'm still handling release management for cliff until the team is approved and ownership can change officially
19:21:22 <terrylhowe> nothing from me, I’m a little behind on cliff reviews
19:22:22 <dtroyer> dhellmann: sure, just was curious if there was anything to talk about
19:22:36 <dhellmann> dtroyer: ok, just making sure that wasn't a surprise :-)
19:23:02 <dhellmann> and by "release management" I really do just mean tagging releases, not much else
19:23:57 <dtroyer> ok, anything else?
19:24:04 <dtroyer> #topic open discussion
19:25:13 <dhellmann> nothing from me
19:25:27 <terrylhowe> do we have a template for osc plugins?
19:25:41 <dtroyer> terrylhowe: yes…
19:26:04 <dtroyer> it's still in my github account: https://github.com/dtroyer/osc-plugin
19:26:13 <terrylhowe> ah, thanks
19:26:21 <terrylhowe> nothing else from me
19:26:42 <lhcheng> nothing from me
19:27:03 <dtroyer> I mentioned another plugin I've been playing with:  https://github.com/dtroyer/osc-debug  that dumps useful stuff for debugging, go figure
19:27:36 <dtroyer> I think I want to make that a stackforge project and move the module commands there too
19:27:40 <dtroyer> someday
19:28:48 <dhellmann> ++
19:29:16 <dtroyer> also highly useful for debugging entry point stuff is dhellmann's entry_point_inspector: https://github.com/dhellmann/entry_point_inspector   it's UI should seem very familiar
19:29:51 <dtroyer> ok, that's it for me then too
19:30:03 <dtroyer> thanks everyone, and again my apologies for the time snafu
19:30:23 <lhcheng> thanks!
19:30:41 <dtroyer> #endmeeting