15:01:25 #startmeeting operators_telco_nfv 15:01:26 Meeting started Wed Apr 5 15:01:25 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is serverascode. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:27 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:30 The meeting name has been set to 'operators_telco_nfv' 15:01:35 hi 15:01:37 #topic roll call 15:01:43 hi shintaro :) 15:01:46 o/ 15:01:57 who else do we have? 15:02:06 Hi, joining after a long time 15:02:08 I know adiren said he could not make it 15:02:11 hi talonx :) 15:02:16 Hi, long time no see.... 15:02:16 Hi :) 15:02:19 Been a lurker mostly 15:02:22 I'm in the west coast so much easier to join :) 15:02:25 hi uli-k :) 15:02:37 hello 15:02:46 hi sergem :) 15:03:10 shintaro what are you up to on the west coast? 15:03:30 OpenNetworkingSummit in Santa Clara 15:03:44 oh cool, I was hoping ot go to that but it didn't work out 15:03:58 sergem have you been to one of these meetings before? 15:04:10 very inspiring 15:04:20 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-telco-nfv-meeting-agenda 15:04:40 I'm serge from Sprint. Sometimes I lurk here. 15:04:52 ^^ that's the agenda if anyone wants to look or add to it, just one thing on it right now and that is some of the upcoming boston forum sessions 15:04:55 I do attend the f2f at openstack 15:05:06 right, I think I remember now :) 15:05:32 ok so we have a few people, please take a second to look at the agenda and add it it, and we shall start at the start :) 15:05:50 I was wondering how the sessions are selected... 15:06:07 #topic boston forum sessions 15:06:19 shintaro I'm not sure how they are selected 15:06:25 anyone know? 15:06:38 #link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ 15:06:47 so to be clear those are submissions, not "accepted" sessions yet 15:06:56 right 15:07:13 I took a look through and added links to a few I thought interesting to NFV 15:07:46 probably the most important is the collaboration session 15:07:47 What I've heard is they are going to have 3 parallel sessions during the Summit 15:07:50 #link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/64 15:07:55 that shintaro wrote up 15:08:11 yes, Ildiko from the Foundation will help us 15:08:16 3 parallel, ok that is a good number 15:08:28 Is there something on containers? 15:08:48 yup a few 15:08:57 "life cycle management..." 15:09:09 openstack via kubernetes... 15:09:30 migration to containers... 15:09:42 kubernetes ops on openstack 15:09:58 I think a few more 15:10:12 I couldn't open the link as I don't have ubuntu one login 15:10:22 oh really? interesting. 15:10:23 container was a hot topic in the OpsMeetup, too 15:10:36 Hi - Sorry - I'm here now 15:10:49 hi jamemcc 15:10:50 sergem do you have an "openstack" id? 15:10:55 like launchpad? 15:11:01 if so that is the same 15:11:07 hi jamemcc 15:11:09 I see Bin has a topic on contained, microservices 15:11:35 ah yes, ok iwll add that to our list 15:12:47 jamemcc we are just looking over the potential forum submissions 15:13:18 The containers topic is big for LCOO - I will end up creating a spreadsheet to show which all seem to be in that category - simethign similar to the Ethercalc I created a little earlier - which I put the link in the agenda and is https://ethercalc.openstack.org/=qqdo5sfmri 15:13:31 jamemcc do you know how the sessions are going to be selected? 15:13:42 #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/=qqdo5sfmri 15:14:01 What I understand is it's a selection committee of 2 from User Group, 2 from TC and 2 from Foundation 15:14:14 That was hearsay (twice) 15:14:25 Then scheduled just liek the presenation topics 15:15:08 I am thinking/hoping that if we can ourselvs be organizing the topics we are interested in and will participate and then give advice ont he order of them - that will help the schedulers a lot 15:15:08 ok great. so we just wait and see 15:16:13 That was where I was thinking ahveing the List (either as you are doing Curtis) in the Agenda - or in the Ethercalc like I started 15:16:23 would be helpful 15:16:39 the ethercalc looks great jamemcc 15:17:00 I think that is a really good idea to work with whoever is selecting the submissions and help out a bit 15:18:03 any other thoughts on the forum session? 15:18:18 if not I don't see any other items added except open discussion 15:18:30 so we prioritise the list? 15:20:12 or we announce our interest/intent to join on the list of sessions as a group? 15:20:30 Yeah - makes sense - maybe a +1 approach to get started. 15:20:32 looks like there are 124 submissions 15:20:55 we can start with the list on ethercalc :) 15:21:02 Some probbly dont' belong on the TelcoNFV WG (our) list 15:21:31 yeah for sure, I was just thinking about how many could be accepted if 3 parallel sessions over 4 days... :) 15:21:35 One reason is if I saw Neutron I added ot to the list 15:22:26 out of curiosity what do you all think of the "blockchain in telelcom"? 15:22:31 I don't quite get that one 15:22:46 isn't that pretty futuristic? 15:23:01 I don't get it either 15:23:10 Yes - pretty far out there 15:23:46 ok, that's what I was thinking 15:23:50 there are probably lots of diverse interest among us. In my company (Sprint), we are focused on VMs. So I am interested in all the container stuff 15:24:16 like 'migration to containers' is a good one. 15:25:01 that one seems to be about the openstack control plane 15:25:16 #link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/96 15:25:48 yes. you have to be careful if it is openstack on container, or container on Openstack 15:25:58 heh yeah 15:26:07 Ah yes. 15:26:25 I will add a comment to that one asking to differentiate 15:27:38 ok, any other thoughs on the forum sessions? 15:28:48 all right, I suppose we just check out the spreadsheet every once and a while and try to keep up with any messages on the mailing list regarding forum sessions 15:28:53 #topic open discussion 15:29:12 if anyone has any other ideas, thoughts, concerns now is the time :) 15:30:00 no form me 15:30:03 from 15:30:20 In terms of the session "Collaboration between Telecom/NFV related groups 15:30:20 " 15:31:36 I asked if either or both of Brian Sullivan and Steven Wright of OPNFV could be there and they agreed 15:32:12 thanks jamemcc, does anyone know if people from OPNFV submitted any of those sessions? 15:32:16 great Ildiko said she invited people from ETSI as well 15:32:59 Bin is from OPNFV 15:33:18 sergem, thanks 15:33:19 Resource reservation is from OPNFV as well 15:33:31 #link http://forumtopics.openstack.org/cfp/details/126 15:33:36 Seems to me 2 ways the discussion could go - others not in our teams asking us questions or if not - and more helpful we can go through our individual WG goals and look for more ways to collaborate 15:34:02 Just thinking through it ahead of time 15:34:33 hmm, and I wonder if some sessions can be double sessions 15:35:06 the one thing I don't like about the summit is that the first session tends to be questions about the group, just like you mention jamemcc 15:35:11 Curtis - the Gluon topic is in essence OPNFV and the 1000+ Scale is one of their priorities 15:35:30 Hmm at least one or 2 more - let me cross check - I should have and will add those to the Ethercalc 15:35:53 I don't see a gluon one 15:36:52 Sorry - I mean this one: Containerized, Cloud Native Microservice in NFV Networking 15:37:06 Bin Hu 15:37:14 ah ok 15:37:22 oh that was gluon 15:37:47 ok 15:37:48 ah, more networking than containers 15:40:37 there's also 4 sessions related to vitrage/alarms 15:41:11 and I wonder if it would be worhtwhile to propose the nfv collaboration session be a double session 15:41:37 +1 40min is way too short 15:41:58 maybe we should add a column for potential double sessions? 15:42:18 jamemcc does that make sense to you? 15:42:43 oops I just added the column 15:43:00 I think that's a good idea :) 15:43:08 won't hurt to ask 15:43:39 right 15:44:16 ok anything else? 15:45:11 well I think that was a good discussion on the forum topics and I think it might help the people who are determining the schedule and submissions 15:45:41 so thanks everyone for coming to the meeting today, much appreciated, and hopefully around and after boston we will pick up some steam so to speak :) 15:45:56 Thank you 15:45:57 thank you serverascode 15:46:08 thanks 15:46:20 :) 15:46:23 #endmeeting