15:02:55 #startmeeting operators_telco_nfv 15:02:55 Meeting started Wed May 3 15:02:55 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is serverascode. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:02:59 The meeting name has been set to 'operators_telco_nfv' 15:03:06 o/ 15:03:13 #topic roll call 15:03:19 o/ 15:03:21 sorry I started this in the wrong room 15:03:27 *sigh* 15:03:43 hello 15:03:48 ad_rien_ it was like I was just talking to you :) 15:03:53 hi SergeM 15:04:02 anyone else here for the ops/telecom nfv meeting? 15:04:49 ok so far looks like just the 3 of us 15:05:03 I'll give it another minute 15:05:45 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-telco-nfv-meeting-agenda 15:05:50 if anyone has anything to add to the agenda 15:05:54 I only have one real item 15:06:20 #topic boston sessoin 15:06:41 we agreed last week what we would put on the agenda for boston, so I think we are good there unless someone has an additiona item to ad 15:06:44 *add 15:07:34 ok nothing so far :) 15:07:45 Hi 15:07:46 anything about The Forum. Not sure myself, asking... 15:08:06 let me find the ethercalc 15:08:10 hi jamemcc :) 15:08:30 #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/=qqdo5sfmri 15:08:47 that was the forum sessions that were related to NFV and some were chosen and some were not 15:09:00 so the boston session I'm talking about is this one 15:09:23 sorry serverascode what is the ethercalc? 15:09:29 link: http://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/17636/openstack-operators-telecomnfv-working-group-session 15:09:45 the ethercalc was where we were listing some of the NFV related forum sessions 15:09:55 the ones that were suggested, some were accepted some not 15:10:27 ok thanks 15:10:34 what about that session too: https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18753/collaboration-between-telecomnfv-related-groups 15:10:47 right, was just looking for the etherpad for that 15:10:49 link# https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-telecom-nfv-collaboration 15:11:17 and then I created an etherpad for our (not forum) session 15:11:18 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-ops-telecom-nfv 15:11:21 link# https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-ops-telecom-nfv 15:11:51 so if you haven't taken a look at the collaboration, please do and add your comments 15:12:00 *collaboration session 15:12:27 should be an interesting session :) 15:13:19 and that is all I know about the summit/forum :) 15:13:26 Yeah - good - agreed that's our shared duty as members of this WG - to make that session good 15:14:38 jamemcc how are things going with the LCOO? 15:15:29 mostly requirements gathering type work so far? 15:15:53 You and Adrien are in this presenation - you must know about it as well: 15:15:59 https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18076/ 15:17:06 yeah we were working on that this morning :) 15:17:41 LCOO - yeah we are trying to get into the Joint Requirements writing mode: Big areas for us and we are trying to identiy and contribute to sessions in Boston are in Cotnainerized Control Plan, Destructive Testing, Skip Level Upgrades - Nirvana Stack 15:18:15 Destructive Testing, I like it :) will have to read up on that 15:18:50 containerized control plane - can you point me to that session(s)? 15:18:57 In general it means your Cloud seems to be runign well then start pulling pieces down and see if it can keep going 15:19:18 chaos monkey? 15:19:27 was just going to say that :) 15:19:39 Yeah 15:20:09 where are people going to be spending most of their time at the summit? forum? presentations? other? 15:20:12 a mix of everything? 15:20:21 Trying to get our requreiments in place before we get to far into solutioning - very aware there are good solutions 15:22:05 jamemcc are you going to try to do the table thing you did at the operators meetup? 15:22:19 where LCOO people hung around the same area 15:22:33 Anyone interested to help us - main session to work is this one: 15:22:35 https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18777/users-operators-adoption-of-qa-tools-plugins 15:22:57 We didnt' get a Forum Session specifically on the topic 15:23:54 It really is a mix: though our desire is to do real work in the Forums 15:24:53 The Presenations in my mind and the way we are tracking them as LCOO are really to get some ideas outr there and then hopefully tracnsition any Q&A to point out the Forum session (or WG) to take the conversation to 15:25:28 ok, cool 15:25:40 any other thoughts or should I move onto the next topic? 15:25:52 We have an LCOO plannign pad here: You need to hve an Atlassian Cloud Account - but shouldn't be any problem to see it: https://openstack-lcoo.atlassian.net/wiki/display/LCOO/Large+Contributing+OpenStack+Operators++Queens+Forum+Planning+Pad 15:26:19 #link https://openstack-lcoo.atlassian.net/wiki/display/LCOO/Large+Contributing+OpenStack+Operators++Queens+Forum+Planning+Pad 15:26:34 Thanks 15:26:48 np, I messed up a couple links above lol 15:27:02 ok onto the other topic, then open discussion 15:27:19 #topic Documentation Meetup 15:27:46 basically I would like to propose that we have some kind of in person documentation meeting perhaps co-located with another event 15:28:16 such as the openstack operators meetup in Aug in Mexico or similar 15:28:32 and that we could have some discussions next week and perhaps get some foundation help on taht 15:28:50 mostly around this #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/generic-nfv-platform 15:28:57 serverascode: can you elaborate a bit more 15:29:07 ok 15:29:08 thanks 15:29:39 I know that shintoro was talking to someone from the foundation and there is some interest in NFV documentation 15:29:57 and also the fact that there is no current multi-region/site docs AFAIK 15:30:18 I know we don't have a lot of people in the meeting today, but I just htought I would float that idea 15:30:19 did they put back the previous documentation ? 15:30:31 I don't think so, but haven't checked in a couple weeks 15:30:43 Yeah I agree we need to have more of working sessions to advance it and that this WG is the right place 15:31:08 they used to do documentation sprints 15:31:18 where they'd meetup for a few days and just write docs 15:31:25 I think it might be something good to do 15:31:44 where "they" is the openstack community 15:32:14 it would be nice at some point to get a bunch of NFV openstack people in a room together :) 15:32:36 though that said I'm not sure what groups like the LCOO are doing in that area, and essentially OPNFV is a big version of that 15:33:22 I might get in contact with Shintaro and see what he thinks 15:33:35 is anyone interested in being part of an attempt to organize? 15:33:38 Yeah - maybe we need to hve a plannign session for the face to face first 15:33:48 absolutely :) 15:33:54 Shintaro and I can try to bring others from LCOO 15:34:20 I wouldnt mind being involved. But probably I would not be able to attend any F2Fs 15:34:33 thanks SergeM :) 15:34:42 I'm sure OPNFV lads will come to talk about what they've already got and how it might fit into their plans 15:34:49 jamemcc should we try to find a time (somehow) next week to discuss? 15:34:55 leads (not lads) 15:34:56 I am also wondering how this doc effort differs from OPNFV. Where OPNFV is trying to get reqs and then fill any gaps within OpenStack projects 15:35:52 I agree SergeM, to me it doesn't matter much where the docs live as long as they exist and are accessible :) 15:36:05 actually I was pointed to some great multisite docs last week from the OPNFV 15:36:07 If you have any casual meetup sometime during next week, keep me in the loop. My email is on the pad 15:36:08 Yes - I'll send a note to the OPNFV leads I know and copy you in attempt to have a plannign session in Boston - if not maybe at least to come to a subsequent session 15:36:26 ok, that sounds great jamemcc :) 15:36:27 thanks 15:36:55 ok, great, so we will start with that and see where it goes next week 15:37:14 any other thoughts on that particular subject or I can move onto open discussion? 15:37:41 I'll give it 30 seconds 15:37:42 :) 15:38:06 #topic open discussion 15:38:13 so that was all I had so far 15:38:38 any open discussion ideas/comments/criticisms? :) 15:38:59 nothing from my side 15:39:17 everyone's mind is in next week already :) 15:39:19 I hope we will find a fruitful way to converge all these efforts around mutli site deploymensts 15:39:29 during the next summit 15:39:35 Thanks. Hope to meet you guys next week. 15:39:38 yeah I hope so too, its an important topic 15:39:47 thanks SergeM :) 15:40:22 ok well, thanks everyone for coming today, have a safe trip to the summit if you are going, and hopefully see you there :) 15:40:22 I appreciate you both taking that lead, will do al I can to help. 15:40:33 See you there 15:40:43 thanks jamemcc! 15:40:48 #endmeeting