16:00:04 #startmeeting oslo 16:00:04 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo 16:00:05 Meeting started Mon Feb 2 16:00:04 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dhellmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:09 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 16:00:21 hi 16:00:22 courtesy ping for jd__, dims, bnemec, flaper87, harlowja, viktors, rpodolyaka1, zzzeek, sileht, kgiusti 16:00:27 courtesy ping for redrobot, jungleboyj, zhiyan, therve, amotoki, GheRivero, bknudson, ihrachyshka, jogo, dougwig, sreshetnyak, amrith 16:00:28 o/ 16:00:32 o/ 16:00:49 lol 16:01:25 o/ 16:01:26 low turnout today :-) 16:01:35 groundhog day 16:01:43 I think that's a holidy 16:01:44 haha 16:02:00 #topic Review action items from previous meeting 16:02:12 #info rpodolyaka & viktors to start a mailing list thread discussing mysql driver change - DONE 16:02:16 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/thread.html#55469 16:02:23 #info dhellmann write down spec approval policy in the specs repository - DONE 16:02:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/150119 16:02:39 #action dhellmann document policy assumptions for library adoption among applications, including milestones and support for incubator code after graduation 16:03:10 o/ 16:03:22 #action bnemec write policy spec on feature freezes 16:03:25 \o 16:03:29 o/ 16:03:30 I think that's it from alst week 16:03:36 dhellmann: Not done yet. :-/ 16:03:43 dhellmann: we're getting more snow today 16:03:59 dims: better you than me :-) 16:04:06 haha 16:04:11 dims: groundhog saw his shadow. 16:04:16 bnemec: yeah, I didn't do mine either, so we'll carry those over 16:04:19 Yeah, we know what happens when Atlanta gets snow. ;-) 16:04:28 bknudson: his shadow would have blown away here in GA 16:04:36 bnemec: seriously, those people are nuts 16:05:06 SNOW = So Not Outside Weather 16:05:09 bknudson: :( 16:05:14 lol 16:05:35 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 16:05:55 nothing from keystone... looks like oslo.policy is at least getting cleaned up. 16:06:02 now that the Great Breaking of 2014 is done and all of the libs with namespace packages are released, how are things looking? 16:06:02 not sure what the outlook is for a release. 16:06:20 bknudson: probably not this week 16:06:27 we need a requirements update for oslo.messaging I think. 16:06:58 #link https://review.openstack.org/150556 16:07:08 it should be in the merge queue already 16:07:24 ok, that should be coming along soon. 16:07:47 I approved some of the policy changes that were up for review this morning, but there are still a few open tickets I think 16:07:51 for some reason some of the changes in keystone are failing... I need to check those out. 16:08:20 #link https://launchpad.net/oslo.policy/+milestone/next-kilo 16:08:47 how about some of the other projects, are things going smoothly? 16:08:49 http://logs.openstack.org/81/151881/1/check/check-grenade-dsvm/d87723f/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2015-01-31_15_32_40_193 -- looks like oslo_messaging. 16:08:59 maybe just needs the requirements update. 16:09:16 No issues from tripleo. 16:09:20 bknudson: check the logs to see if it downgraded for some reason 16:10:34 bknudson: and let me know if you continue to have trouble and I'll see if I can help figuring out what's going on there 16:11:01 if there are no other issues to raise, we'll move on to the k-2 checkup 16:11:28 #topic Ongoing work & Review priorities 16:11:28 #link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/next-kilo 16:11:28 #link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/kilo-2 16:11:36 The k-2 deadline is this week, so we should be focusing on wrapping up any remaining work for blueprints and bugs associated with this milestone. 16:12:03 I don't see any incubator reviews that look critical for k-2 16:12:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack%2Foslo-incubator+is:open,n,z 16:12:16 OK I’d like to put a plug out for enginefacade: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138215/ 16:12:31 I would like to have some reviews for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151027/ because that will make it easier to work on the versionedobjects lib 16:12:56 zzzeek: ok, is that blueprint targeted for k-3? 16:13:09 dhellmann: I don’t know 16:13:15 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+spec/make-enginefacade-a-facade 16:13:21 1.2.0? what is that? 16:13:24 how do you find that so fast.... 16:13:36 zzzeek: practice 16:13:38 shrugs 16:13:46 ok, I changed it to "next-kilo" 16:13:52 thanks 16:14:33 just a reminder to everyone, make sure the milestone target on your bps and bugs are set correctly to ensure review priority 16:15:06 and reviewers, check https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/next-kilo for items to review 16:15:44 how about anyone else? is anyone blocked on something you thought you'd have done by the k-2 deadline? 16:17:38 ok, moving on then 16:17:39 #topic Releases for this week 16:18:00 we should get back into a routine of releasing libs frequently, to keep the changes small 16:18:12 We have a backlog of changes in taskflow that I'd like to release. I need to talk with harlowja about that 16:18:24 The same for pbr, though I need to talk to some of the other pbr devs about those before a release. 16:18:34 I don't think we want pbr this week, with the deadline. 16:19:11 I see a new fixture in oslo.utils. dims, is that ready for a release? 16:19:25 dhellmann: looking 16:19:36 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/wVpLp8C4ES 16:20:15 dhellmann: i believe so 16:20:32 dims: do you want to do the honors, or shall I? 16:20:56 dhellmann: please go ahead, still catching up from travels 16:21:04 dims: ok, sure thing 16:21:50 oslotest looks like it's ready, too, so I'll do that one as well 16:22:31 bnemec: oslo.serialization has a new "messagepack utils helper" -- is someone waiting for that? 16:23:29 dhellmann: I'm not sure. That only sounds vaguely familiar to me. I think maybe harlowja was involved in that somehow? 16:23:40 if we can get https://review.openstack.org/149090 approved we can do another oslo.log change and test it with the nova patch again 16:23:44 I could be wrong though. That's my vague memory of seeing an email about it. 16:23:46 bnemec: ok 16:24:23 rpodolyaka, zzzeek : oslo.db has some fixes and new features, is anyone waiting for those? are we at a good point for a release? 16:24:32 dhellmann: hmmm 16:25:05 dhellmann: yes the retry decorator I’d like people to get onto 16:25:22 zzzeek: ok, I'll go ahead and cut a release 16:25:50 well, now that I think about it, I wonder if we shouldn't wait until next week because of the milestone this week 16:25:58 maybe I'll just do all of these on monday 16:26:28 o/ Sorry, had another meeting run long. 16:26:35 dhellmann: theres just that one change, an improvement in revalidation of failed connections, and that’s it 16:27:30 zzzeek: ok, let's let this be a quiet week and release things next week 16:27:36 dhellmann: OK 16:27:41 dhellmann oslo.i18n ... I've got new Nova tests and Cinder test cleanup waiting on the new fixture that is under review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147262/) 16:27:53 It's unlikely anyone is going to be adopting anything new at a deadline anyway. 16:28:16 bnemec: right 16:28:33 jecarey: ok, I'll put that on my review list 16:28:53 #topic open discussion 16:29:03 that's all I had on the agenda, does anyone have anything else to bring up? 16:30:15 * dhellmann puts on some music to drown out the crickets 16:30:24 :-) 16:30:37 ok, I think we can call it early then 16:30:47 spend your extra 29 minutes reviewing patches! :-) 16:31:03 thanks 16:31:08 thanks everyone 16:31:40 #endmeeting