16:00:49 #startmeeting oslo 16:00:49 courtesy ping for GheRivero, amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dougwig, e0ne, flaper87, garyk, harlowja, haypo, 16:00:49 courtesy ping for ihrachyshka, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz, lifeless, lintan, ozamiatin, redrobot, rpodolyaka, spamaps 16:00:49 courtesy ping for sergmelikyan, sreshetnyak, sileht, sreshetnyak, stevemar, therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek, gcb 16:00:50 Meeting started Mon Jan 11 16:00:49 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dims_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:51 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:51 o/ 16:00:54 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 16:00:58 o/ 16:01:00 hi 16:01:01 o/ 16:01:02 o/ 16:01:03 0/ 16:01:05 o/ 16:01:06 o/ 16:01:12 hi rpodolyaka kgiusti toabctl dhellmann jecarey ozamiatin_ gcb rbradfor 16:01:13 o/ 16:01:30 hi ihrachys 16:01:35 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 16:01:36 o/ 16:01:37 o/ 16:01:49 nothing from neutron side, or I am ignorant :) 16:02:09 ihrachys : thanks 16:02:33 nothing from nova as I know :-) 16:02:39 thanks gcb 16:02:58 ./ 16:03:00 gcb there's a oslo.cache review in nova that we'll need to resurrect 16:03:17 nothing from trove. 16:03:19 #topic Releases for Mitaka 16:03:19 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265673/ 16:03:38 i have not lined up pbr or oslo.messaging or taskflow for this round 16:04:07 oslo.messaging has the pika driver merged from feature branch to master, so i'd like folks to look at the code that was merged 16:04:10 please 16:05:13 my travis setup looks green with the latest in master branches of oslo.* - https://travis-ci.org/dims/ except for may be a py34 test case in nova for which they have a blacklist file that can be updated 16:05:46 dims_: speaking of pbr, are we going to release one for kilo? we had some issues with testr lately, that could be fixed by pbr release with some backports. 16:06:13 ihrachys : this one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265684/ 16:06:33 dims_: right 16:07:13 ihrachys : let's get lifeless to +1 that one and then chat about it in #openstack-release if it is still stuck 16:07:26 cool? 16:07:34 aye 16:07:43 k next topic 16:07:44 #topic osprofiler adoption spec 16:07:44 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103825/ 16:08:00 there's a bunch of +1's so far 16:08:57 may i please have +1's from folks here? please add it to your review queue for today? 16:09:10 dhellmann : would love to see your vote 16:09:54 dims_ : sure, I'll take a look. Is there a separate cross-project spec or is this just an oslo thing 16:09:54 ? 16:10:09 dhellmann : this one proposes oslo as a home for the library 16:10:16 ah 16:10:58 k next one is slightly more controversial 16:11:03 #topic oslo.messaging compression 16:11:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247668/ 16:11:40 the issue with this one was kombu has a easy toggle to switch on compression https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249215/5/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py 16:12:05 and zmq does not convert the full payload to json before shipping 16:12:53 does that make it a feature of the driver, instead of the library, then? 16:12:57 so it's a toss up between how we can use existing mechanisms to switch on compression vs do we force drivers to json first then send the message 16:13:03 dhellmann : right 16:13:26 dims_: dhellmann: ++ for making it a feature of a driver 16:13:37 I haven't read the spec, but it seems like the easy win for now is to make it a driver option and then when all of the drivers support it we can deprecate those options in favor of a central one 16:14:08 dhellmann : y, that's what i was leaning towards as well. we'll learn first from that exercise in a single driver 16:14:17 right 16:14:58 flaper87 : kgiusti : any opinions? 16:15:18 ozamiatin_ : ack agree 16:15:25 dims_: +1 to driver for now. 16:15:54 kgiusti : ok, please vote on the spec when you get a chance to review 16:16:05 dims_: will do 16:16:24 no objections from me 16:16:39 cool thanks 16:16:41 #topic Open discussion 16:16:41 Any other reviews? specs? 16:16:48 dims_: Need review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261546/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265414/ 16:17:14 ozamiatin_ : ack starred them both 16:17:26 dims_: thanks 16:18:11 rpodolyaka : ping about the discussion with zzzeek on ML 16:18:57 rpodolyaka : do we propose any changes in oslo libs for that discussion? 16:19:05 not yet 16:19:08 #link http://markmail.org/message/k3vpwqihums3obtv 16:19:17 but looks like we should - at least for oslo.service 16:19:22 but probably for oslo.db too 16:20:04 I'll go over the thread once again and probably ping mhorban and ezhova 16:20:16 rpodolyaka : much appreciated :) 16:20:19 np 16:20:33 kgiusti toabctl dhellmann jecarey ozamiatin_ gcb rbradfor kragniz ihrachys flaper87 amrith - any other things to talk about today? 16:20:35 credit really goes to zzzeek who spotted this 16:20:46 yep +1000 16:20:47 yes 16:20:53 since change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/257561/ (077fee4d439a6ecfa95e4e5626e4c5a3f9e7a72d) has now merged, I'd like to know when we'd get a new version of the oslo.utils so we can update requirements.txt and begin to use the new method. 16:21:40 amrith : i've lined up a release for today, you can propose a g-r update when the release goes out. as policy we don't automatically bump versions in g-r 16:21:57 ok, wilco 16:22:06 thanks 16:22:49 i am missing harlowja :) hey, you around? 16:23:29 last call before we wrap up :) 16:23:53 i'll wait today for any last feedback on the osprofiler spec 16:24:04 and we can get that rolling tomorrow 16:24:10 boris-42 : ^^ 16:24:37 anyone involved in oslo.messaging, please look through the pika code 16:24:51 thanks everyone! 16:24:59 #endmeeting