16:00:50 #startmeeting oslo 16:00:51 Meeting started Mon Sep 26 16:00:50 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is harlowja_at_home. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:54 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 16:00:58 ding a ling 16:01:01 o/ 16:01:11 \o/ 16:01:13 \o 16:01:17 courtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dims 16:01:17 courtesy ping for dougwig, e0ne, flaper87, garyk, gcb, GheRivero, haypo 16:01:17 courtesy ping for ihrachys, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz 16:01:17 courtesy ping for lifeless, lintan, lxsli, Nakato, ozamiatin, rbradfor, redrobot 16:01:17 courtesy ping for rpodolyaka, sergmelikyan, sileht, spamaps, sreshetnyak, sreshetnyak, stevemar 16:01:18 courtesy ping for therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek 16:01:23 \o 16:01:26 o/ 16:01:27 o/ 16:01:37 yo yo 16:01:38 o/ 16:01:56 ihrachys, how's the neutron upgrades :) 16:02:08 that meeting always seems exciting, lol 16:02:19 o/ 16:02:29 :) it rolls, maybe not as quick as you would desire :) 16:02:59 :) 16:03:19 okie dokie, guess we can get this show on the road 16:03:27 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 16:03:39 Nothing to report 16:03:40 I have a question about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370499/ 16:03:41 not expecting any issues but anything happening out there? 16:03:48 uh oh, does that require me to login 16:03:49 lol 16:03:50 that switches neutron to using to_policy_values() 16:04:13 k 16:04:15 by doing it, the patch also drops some keys from the dict available for policy engine 16:04:30 I was wondering, is it safe to do? should it be in scope of the patch? 16:05:55 hmmm, not totally sure, i do see where u are coming from though 16:06:25 whatever you folks tell us to do! :) 16:06:41 you are maintaining both sides of the pipe - receiving and producing 16:07:32 ihrachys, do u mind sending a ML email for that one, it seems like a useful question and i'm not sure anyone currently in the meeting has the best answer 16:07:51 ack 16:07:54 basically the diff between https://github.com/openstack/oslo.context/blob/master/oslo_context/context.py#L119 and https://github.com/openstack/oslo.context/blob/master/oslo_context/context.py#L138 16:08:16 ihrachys, thanks 16:08:25 i think its a valid question :) 16:09:14 I had one more, we were planning to adopt constraints for neutron-lib, but then armax asked why oslo.* does not do it 16:09:19 and hence - should we? 16:09:25 so it would be great to know why 16:09:41 maybe we miss something and it's not good to do it for libs 16:09:58 requirement constraints right? 16:10:04 yea 16:10:06 k 16:11:07 ok I guess another topic for ML :)) 16:11:11 dhellmann, is there a general policy on libraries and constraints, i haven't seen one that i can remember 16:11:24 ihrachys, i don't recall any specific reason for that one 16:11:41 ok. I asked dhellmann before, he forwarded me to tonyb. 16:11:41 I think we just never got around to it and didn't consider it a high priority. 16:12:15 but there could be some reason we don't want to do it, so that's why I suggested consulting with tonyb before going ahead 16:12:22 k 16:12:33 ya, it feels like to me, just never got around to it 16:12:38 kk, sorry for taking a lot of time of the meeting. I will keep silence. 16:12:41 np 16:12:54 its ok :-P 16:14:01 #topic Summit 16:14:10 so a couple reminders :) 16:14:13 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-oslo-summit-planning 16:14:28 don't forget to add session ideas there :) 16:14:51 sometime soon that will have to be translated into an actual list 16:15:01 and 16:15:04 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-live-from-oslo 16:17:00 #topic Newton 16:17:19 just a reminder, for those that haven't checked it out recently 16:17:22 #link https://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html 16:17:31 Sep 26-30 R-1 Final RCs and intermediary releases 16:17:34 guess thats this week! 16:17:35 lol 16:18:02 man another release, jeez 16:18:08 i remember the D days 16:18:09 lol 16:18:28 yeah, then after the release of Newton , we can release new oslo.* lib, right ? 16:18:35 yup 16:18:50 should be safe to do that than :) 16:19:46 #topic Reviews needing review 16:19:56 in the meantime any reviews people want eyes on? 16:20:07 (just don't make me login, cause i'm not sure if that's fixed yet) 16:20:08 lol 16:20:21 nm, seems fixed, ha 16:20:36 fixed now :-) 16:20:51 :) 16:21:45 https://tinyurl.com/ze6k557 is still a good URL for folks, basically the oslo review dashboard from the dashboard generation git/project 16:21:54 *just incase people haven't seen that 16:22:25 #link https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator 16:22:26 "Server Error" - no reviews!!! 16:22:58 lol 16:23:04 odd 16:23:08 make sure u logged in 16:23:18 i gotta go create that file @ https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator/tree/master/dashboards 16:23:22 i swear there was an oslo one in there 16:23:37 thats the little tool to make these 16:23:56 +1 logged in before hitting url - works for me 16:24:08 :) 16:24:26 https://github.com/openstack/gerrit-dash-creator/blob/master/dashboards/tooz_taskflow.dash is an example if people are interested 16:24:38 * harlowja_at_home i swear there was an oslo one, pretty sure someone deleted it, lol 16:25:39 #topic Open discussion 16:25:52 guess we are in the stage of the meeting 16:25:53 ha 16:26:11 I got the URL from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Review_Links 16:26:14 sorry I missed the beginning. No keystone issues that I know of. 16:26:22 bknudson, thanks :) 16:26:37 gcb, right, oh ya, that's right 16:26:49 harlowja_at_home : I moved the dashboard file to the incubator a while back because it let us manage the reviews 16:26:57 it's probably in the tools repo now? 16:27:01 right, wondering if i transfered it over 16:27:01 lol 16:27:17 oh hey look at that 16:27:18 lol 16:27:56 wondering if the dashboards/ folder didn't get moved over 16:27:56 lol 16:28:12 #action harlowja_at_home fix the dashboards folder 16:31:12 alright since its getting quiet in here 16:31:19 just a reminder for anyone that has bigger features and such 16:31:22 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo-specs 16:31:53 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273468/ from lxsli1 may still be useful (if people are interested) 16:32:40 same with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229194/ (if anyone wants to take that over) 16:34:00 okie dokie, guess we will call it a meeting, unless other folks have anything to bring up :) 16:34:08 Do we need a spec review day or week ? 16:34:19 gcb, i think it could be useful :) 16:34:45 personally i'd like to discuss on how we can have less of them get abandoned and such 16:35:00 but its a tricky question, because sometimes people just don't have time 16:35:06 haha , maybe we can try it 16:35:13 sure :) 16:35:38 gcb, want to start a email for that? maybe later this week or next? 16:35:46 it seems like a good idea to me :) 16:36:04 ack, will send out a email about the idea 16:36:14 super :) 16:38:05 alright, until next week! 16:38:11 thanks all for showing up :) 16:38:37 thanks harlowja_at_home 16:38:41 np :) 16:38:48 for more awesome good times 16:38:52 #openstack-oslo 16:38:54 lol 16:38:57 #endmeeting