15:00:27 <gcb> #startmeeting  oslo
15:00:28 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Jan 29 15:00:27 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gcb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:29 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:31 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'oslo'
15:00:43 <gcb> courtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, crushil, dansmith, dhellmann
15:00:43 <gcb> courtesy ping for dims, dougwig, e0ne, electrocucaracha, flaper87, garyk, gcb
15:00:43 <gcb> courtesy ping for GheRivero, haypo, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti
15:00:43 <gcb> courtesy ping for kragniz, lhx_, lifeless, lxsli, Nakato, ozamiatin, rbradfor
15:00:49 <e0ne> hi
15:00:50 <gcb> courtesy ping for redrobot, rpodolyaka, sergmelikyan, sileht, spamaps, sreshetnyak, sreshetnyak
15:00:52 <gcb> courtesy ping for stevemar, therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek,zxy,stephenfin
15:01:14 <ansmith> hello gcb
15:01:39 <gcb> hi e0ne  ansmith
15:01:43 <kgiusti> hi!
15:02:01 <jungleboyj> Howdy.
15:02:17 <gcb> hi jungleboyj
15:02:34 <gcb> #topic Red flags for/from liaisons
15:02:56 <jungleboyj> Don't think Cinder has any red flags.
15:03:01 <bnemec> o/
15:03:16 * gcb wave to bnemec
15:03:31 <gcb> jungleboyj: thanks
15:03:44 <smcginnis> jungleboyj: We will need to get in the iso8601 change to be able to raise the g-r for oslo.versionedutils. That's all I'm aware of.
15:04:12 <jungleboyj> smcginnis:  Is there a patch for that?
15:04:38 <smcginnis> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536182/
15:05:21 <jungleboyj> smcginnis:  Thank you.
15:06:21 <gcb> smcginnis: should we issue release for oslo.versionedobjects and other libraries this week ?
15:06:36 <gcb> I think we passed the date we can do that
15:07:48 <smcginnis> gcb: oslo.versionedobjects was released, but now there is a failure on the patch to raise the global requirements.
15:08:16 <smcginnis> So worse case we will have to keep it capped for queens, but I think the requirements team is hoping the affected projects get updated and we can raise that.
15:08:33 <crushil> Hi. Sorry I'm late
15:10:13 <gcb> hi crushil
15:10:40 <gcb> smcginnis: do you mean https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538521/ and  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531788/
15:11:48 <gcb> just https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538521/
15:11:58 <gcb> hope we can bump that ASAP
15:12:37 <gcb> #topic Releases
15:12:40 <smcginnis> gcb: Oh, thanks. I was just looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538549/1, but it appears 538521 will be needed first.
15:13:59 <gcb> yeah, we need update upper-constraint first
15:14:26 <gcb> there is no new release for oslo  this week
15:15:39 <gcb> #topic PTG
15:15:53 <gcb> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-ptg-rocky
15:16:58 <gcb> still need more topics to discuss, please feel free to add more :-)
15:17:24 <gcb> #topic Stuck Reviews
15:17:33 <gcb> any stuck reviews ?
15:19:04 <gcb> as we discussed in the last weekly meeting , we have been triaging bugs  and record ownership at the bottom of https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo-queens-tasks
15:20:31 <gcb> Some projects' bugs need to be triaged, please feel free to take over if you have time :-)
15:20:47 <gcb> #topic Open discussion
15:21:26 <kgiusti> Q: would anyone object if I enabled "expire incomplete bugs" setting in launchpad for oslo.messaging?
15:21:36 <dhellmann> we should have that set for all repos
15:21:46 <dhellmann> I mean, it might not but, but it should be
15:21:57 <dhellmann> ugh, "might not be"
15:22:06 <dhellmann> so yes, please turn it on :-)
15:22:13 <kgiusti> will do, thanks.
15:22:25 <gcb> ++
15:23:47 <kgiusti> other news:  our friend msimonin from INRIA and the Fog/Edge/Massively Distributed Cloud WG has been testing oslo.messaging's behavior in various large scale tests...
15:24:26 <kgiusti> time permitting he'd be able to talk about this at PTG (see line 66 in the ptg planning epad)
15:24:44 <gcb> kgiusti: go to know that
15:25:13 <msimonin> hi all :)
15:25:48 <gcb> hi msimonin
15:27:10 <kgiusti> It's a great opportunity to get some feedback from large scale testing.  thanks msimonin!
15:27:27 <msimonin> My pleasure kgiusti :)
15:27:38 <msimonin> how much time do we have per slots ?
15:28:31 <kgiusti> I suspect that depends on how many slots we use up :)  gcb?
15:28:45 <gcb> it's depends on specific team,  maybe 45 minutes or longer than that
15:29:22 <gcb> yeah, depends on the volumes of how many topics we have,  we have one day
15:30:53 <dhellmann> would this be a presentation of performance data, or proposals for improvements based on that performance data?
15:31:36 <msimonin> There will be data definetely
15:32:46 <msimonin> Regarding possible improvements, there might be some discussions indeed
15:32:57 <dhellmann> ok, good
15:34:23 <msimonin> I even know that kgiusti has some new APIs in mind :)
15:34:50 <kgiusti> msimonin: now don't give away all the surprises! :D
15:35:10 <msimonin> I'm just teasing a bit :)
15:36:39 <gcb> :-), looking forward to surprises
15:37:30 <gcb> Just a reminder of PTL elections :  http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126230.html
15:37:58 <gcb> https://governance.openstack.org/election/
15:41:35 <gcb> any other topic ?
15:42:38 <gcb> okay, we can end the meeting now, have a nice day everyone
15:43:12 <gcb> #endmeeting