15:01:06 #startmeeting oslo 15:01:06 Meeting started Mon Jul 15 15:01:06 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bnemec. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:07 Courtesy ping for bnemec, jungleboyj, moguimar, hberaud, kgiusti, redrobot, stephenfin, johnsom 15:01:07 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting 15:01:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:10 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 15:01:16 o/ 15:01:17 o/ 15:02:05 o/ 15:04:31 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 15:04:41 Nothing that I know of from the Oslo side. 15:05:03 nothing I am aware of in Neutron country 15:05:37 Nothing from Cinder. 15:07:04 Nothing from nova that I've heard about, fwiw 15:07:25 Cool, thanks everyone 15:07:30 #topic Releases 15:07:57 I forgot to do these last week, which means it makes sense that nothing broke. :-) 15:08:21 I'll try to get them out today. 15:09:06 I saw the mandatory change merged in oslo.messaging, so I think we're ready to release that? 15:09:10 gsantomaggio: ^ 15:09:28 No kgiusti today. :-/ 15:09:55 I can ping later too before I propose the releases. 15:10:44 #topic Action items from last meeting 15:10:45 I think it's ready for a release but yep ask before 15:10:54 @bnemec Mandatory is ready for Client side, and I think we can release with these feature. 15:11:18 Sounds good, thanks hberaud and gsantomaggio. 15:11:26 Just one action item from last week: 15:11:30 "hberaud add checks for README.rst validity" 15:11:35 I am working also for mandatory in `RPCServer` will release asap 15:12:06 bnemec: done. everything is ok we don't need to add something 15:12:21 hberaud: My favorite kind of outcome. :-) 15:12:28 :) 15:13:19 #topic PTG Planning 15:13:37 As you've probably seen, they're starting planning for the PTG. 15:14:08 The Foundation wants to know which teams will need space, so we need to try to figure out if we will have anyone attending. 15:14:21 The due date is August 11th. 15:14:52 Since that's a weekend the practical date is actually the 9th, I guess. 15:15:28 I don't know if I'm going yet, and I realize most others probably don't either. 15:15:59 I'll probably go ahead and create a planning etherpad like some of the other teams have done. 15:16:05 #action bnemec to create PTG planning etherpad 15:17:24 If you know that you're definitely _not_ going, that will be helpful to know as well. 15:18:18 And of course if you know of something that we should discuss in person feel free to make a note of that too. 15:18:36 I think that's about it for the PTG. Watch for an email with the etherpad link. 15:19:07 One thing to keep in mind is the fact that there may be new people from China that attend that we haven't seen in the past. 15:19:19 * jungleboyj is hoping that will make things more productive for Cinder. 15:20:04 Yeah, that's a good point. 15:20:13 *fingers crossed* 15:20:33 Although if none of our active cores are there it might still be a problem. :-) 15:20:49 True. I know I am going to have to be there. :-) 15:20:55 I'm almost certain to be there, fwiw 15:21:12 * njohnston is going to sit this one out 15:21:12 (Given that I'm in Japan the previous two weeks, it'd be silly not to go) 15:21:25 :-) 15:21:27 Heh, that's convenient. :-) 15:22:05 me too (not for the japan part :p ) 15:22:22 Then I guess I can probably request at least half a day so there's a specific time for people to find us. 15:22:22 Would have been more convenient if I'd checked PTG/Summit dates _before_ booking my return flights, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:22:54 Generally speaking, we've gotten through our formal topics in half a day anyway. 15:23:58 I still don't know if I'm going (I haven't gone to two of the three APAC summits), but it sounds like we will have representation either way. 15:25:02 #topic Weekly Wayward Review 15:25:21 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650915 15:26:38 Looks like a fairly simple osprofiler review. 15:30:27 And lgtm. Just need another +2. 15:34:11 Okay, I'll just action this one. Hopefully we can get it merged this week. 15:34:16 #action Oslo cores to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650915 15:34:28 #topic Open discussion 15:34:35 Anything else this week? 15:36:05 (network issue, sorry, maybe I missing something) 15:36:24 hberaud: Looking for reviews on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650915 15:36:39 bnemec: thanks 15:37:19 bnemec: I'll take a look 15:37:43 hberaud: Thanks 15:37:54 Other than that we're in open discussion. 15:38:24 can someone take a look to https://review.opendev.org/#/c/648727/ too? 15:39:22 else concerning the oslo.messaging heartbeat issue, kguisti asked to move this feature as an experimental feature (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663074/) 15:39:54 I've made the necessary changes (for the optional part) 15:40:06 bnemec: what do you think about? 15:40:42 bnemec: in the past you asked to avoid to introduce the optional mode 15:41:26 bnemec: so I'm interesting by your point of view too 15:41:52 s/interesting/interested/ 15:42:29 hberaud: I know I had initially requested that we just do the right thing always and not make it configurable, but since it's not 100% clear what that is I'd be okay with making it optional for testing. 15:42:46 I guess the main thing would be to mark it very explicitly as experimental, probably in the opt help string. 15:42:55 bnemec: okay nice 15:43:03 That's on my todo list, so I'll try to get to it this week. 15:43:36 bnemec: yeah it's already tagged "experimental" in the help string 15:43:43 Cool 15:43:51 bnemec: thx 15:45:35 Anything else? 15:46:03 not on my side 15:46:28 nope :)! 15:48:28 Okay, I'm going to action some of the things we discussed and then end the meeting then. 15:48:34 #action Oslo cores to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/648727/ 15:48:41 #action bnemec to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663074/ 15:48:52 And that's it. Thanks for joining everyone! 15:48:54 #endmeeting