15:00:01 #startmeeting oslo 15:00:02 Meeting started Mon Oct 19 15:00:01 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 15:00:13 Courtesy ping for bnemec, smcginnis, moguimar, johnsom, stephenfin, bcafarel, kgiusti, jungleboyj, sboyron, damani 15:00:19 o/ 15:00:25 o/ 15:00:29 hi 15:00:36 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting 15:00:48 o/ 15:02:47 o/ 15:03:19 o/ 15:03:58 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 15:05:17 we just started wallaby few days ago, so I don't expect lot of topics here 15:05:50 probably not 15:05:59 o/ late (in another meeting though) 15:06:28 #topic Releases liaison 15:07:26 Thanks damani for proposed releases 15:07:55 I seen few releases against stable branches 15:08:22 did we get release of oslo.utils? 15:08:22 you're welcome 15:08:24 =) 15:09:01 moguimar: nope, I don't seen specific changes on oslo.utils or maybe I missed something 15:09:05 yes i have proposed one release of oslo.messaging for victoria 15:09:18 we have the md5 thing for FIPS 15:09:29 damani: interested? 15:09:36 not on stable branches though 15:09:44 ah 15:09:49 i have also proposed one release of pobr 15:09:49 we are waiting for a W release 15:09:55 wallaby is under construct 15:10:21 do you have a timeline? 15:10:24 I just proposed a patch early https://review.opendev.org/#/c/758815/ 15:10:54 moguimar: for now we waiting for feedback 15:11:10 ok 15:11:13 I think it will be done in few days 15:11:27 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/758804/ 15:11:39 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/758804/ 15:11:57 thanks damani 15:12:14 I think we are done for releases 15:12:17 #topic Security liaison 15:12:34 bnemec: anything to brings there? 15:13:00 Nope 15:13:10 ack thanks 15:13:23 #topic TaCT SIG liaison 15:13:48 sboyron, moguimar: any topics to bring there? 15:14:00 nope 15:14:14 or I didn't see any email 15:14:26 nope not on my side too 15:14:35 ack thanks 15:14:39 #topic Action items from last meeting 15:14:48 but I'm still trying to understand the exact scope of this role TBH 15:15:04 sorry 15:15:09 np 15:15:44 maybe you can start by discussing about https://governance.openstack.org/sigs/tact-sig.html with moguimar 15:16:02 sboyron: it could be an entrypoint for you 15:16:08 but ITUC bnemec was in charge of this previously through PTL role, maybe outside of this meeting I'll need to reach you bnemec to understand better 15:16:35 I think mostly you're just a point of contact in case of ci issues. 15:16:47 that is my understanding 15:16:56 And you probably would have been pinged about stuff like the migration to focal and zuulv3. 15:17:01 that if something goes on fire, we'll get an email 15:17:14 ack 15:17:18 or many emails 15:17:22 lol 15:17:23 :-) 15:17:29 depending on the fire =P 15:17:33 so, nothing is on fire now, we can continue ^^ 15:17:46 so, bnemec to keep track of our liaisons on the wiki. 15:17:50 done 15:18:15 I seen your wiki's update 15:18:26 moguimar to reach pre-commit people 15:18:30 any update? 15:18:39 yep 15:18:46 found out where they hide 15:18:53 in a discord server 15:19:03 lol 15:19:03 nice catch ! 15:19:10 they asked why we don't cache github too same way we do with pypi 15:19:31 I still need to follow up there 15:19:35 but in the other hand 15:19:48 the last pre-commit patch is just waiting for your reviews =) 15:19:51 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742160/ 15:20:19 #action hberaud to review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742160/ 15:20:33 thanks 15:20:58 even though we had a -1 from Clark in the previous PS, I don't think we should do different than the other 34 patches accross the 34 other oslo repos 15:21:28 so bnemec smcginnis stephenfin ^ 15:21:55 agreed, we left enough time to catch this kind of details 15:21:56 Yeah, I think that's fair. We need to address the caching issue across Oslo, not just in pbr. 15:22:23 I do wonder if pre-commit is even necessary for pbr? 15:22:32 It's not something that should change much, if at all, now 15:23:04 Yeah, pbr is a little unique compared to the other oslo repos. 15:23:06 so it wouldn't be much of an overload either 15:23:13 and we keep all repos aligned 15:23:28 agreed 15:24:05 how do we do then? vote for merge/abandon? 15:24:49 I'm in favor to keep pre-commit on pbr 15:24:57 Fair enough. 15:25:12 keep++ 15:25:39 Then please comment on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742160/ 15:26:08 #topic Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review 15:26:42 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/747440/ 15:26:50 Wayward Wallaby Weview 15:27:22 W3R 15:27:40 You forgot Weekly. 15:27:44 W4R :-P 15:27:49 :) 15:28:06 so this patch is etcd3gw stuff 15:28:17 Can we temporarily change our mascot to Elmer Fudd? ;-) 15:28:40 feel free :) 15:29:54 I think we need to take a look to the follow up patch too 15:30:15 rechecked 15:30:30 #topic Open discussion 15:30:38 anything else? 15:30:43 * hberaud yes 15:31:11 Not for me. 15:31:48 As you seen I added few topics to our meeting agenda to allow our liaisons to bring topics that they own during our meetings 15:31:50 not on my end 15:32:02 hberaud++ 15:32:10 Do you think this format is useful for us? 15:32:15 yep 15:32:51 As we are now a DPL I think it's important to allow to every liaison to raise things 15:32:52 yes 15:34:02 also, don't forget to vote on this patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/757906/ especially all our liaisons people 15:34:32 moguimar: we want your vote :) 15:35:11 anything else? 15:35:46 not on my side 15:36:14 then I think we are done 15:36:17 +1 to the agenda changes 15:36:49 #endmeeting