15:00:07 #startmeeting oslo 15:00:08 Meeting started Mon May 17 15:00:07 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:13 Courtesy ping for hberaud, stephenfin, moguimar, jungleboyj, bnemec, johnsom, bcafarel, kgiusti, gmann, valleedelisle, sboyron, damani 15:00:13 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 15:00:17 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting 15:00:21 Will just wait a couple minutes for folks. 15:00:25 o/ 15:00:36 o/ 15:01:06 o/ 15:01:55 o/ 15:02:40 o/ 15:03:25 o/ 15:04:07 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 15:04:20 Nothing to report from the Octavia/Designate side 15:04:41 Nothing that I am aware of from Cinder. 15:04:56 I was away last week but I did not hear major complaints from Neutron 15:05:08 Nothing that I'm aware of from Oslo 15:05:53 lol 15:06:43 #topic Releases liaison 15:07:31 late me o/ 15:09:06 We released a couple of bugfix versions for stable series and independent projects (oslo.log, tooz, etc...). I don't have much more topics to speak about here. 15:09:10 moguimar: o/ 15:09:19 #topic Security liaison 15:09:35 bnemec: The floor is yours 15:10:07 Nothing from me. We didn't get tapped in the last round of security threads on the list. :-) 15:10:19 thank you bnemec 15:10:25 #topic TaCT SIG liaison 15:10:34 moguimar, sboyron: The floor is yours 15:11:02 no updates 15:11:29 thank you moguimar 15:11:32 #topic Action items from last meeting 15:11:46 No actions 15:12:00 #topic Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review 15:12:35 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/787384 15:12:46 Just need a final +W 15:12:54 (queens backport) 15:13:01 checking it 15:13:47 Could be worth to land it before the next round of EOL branches (pike, rocky, queens) 15:14:15 thank moguimar 15:14:28 do you know why didin't they do msg_id="" in the original patch? 15:15:03 instead of name=msg_id -> name="" 15:15:09 yes, to avoid failover issue IIRC 15:15:09 feels too hardcoded 15:15:20 Ah I see 15:15:50 Nope I don't remember 15:16:23 That's a cherry-pick 15:16:24 ok, +W 15:16:31 Thanks 15:16:36 You can't have a default on the first parameter without also setting one for the second. 15:16:38 was it also backported to other branches? 15:16:46 Yes 15:16:58 I can see only queens and pike 15:17:09 If I'm right it was merged since stein 15:17:10 and original patch March 2020 15:17:29 let me double check too 15:21:44 so, by using `git branch --remotes --contains 3a5de89` I can find it on stein/train/ussuri/victoria/wallaby 15:21:47 and master 15:23:09 It was also backported to rocky https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/713153 15:23:14 so queens LGTM 15:23:57 ouky 15:24:13 thanks moguimar 15:24:24 #topic Courtesy ping 15:26:05 Just a friendly reminder about the future courtesy ping list, next meeting I'll use the new one so don't forget to put your name in if you want to continue to receive notifications https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo 15:26:18 #topic Open discussion 15:26:40 I've seen a bunch of pings about https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1896916 this morning. 15:26:40 Launchpad bug 1896916 in oslo.db "duplicate key error for mysql >=8.0.19 are not parsed correctly" [Undecided,New] 15:26:47 o/ 15:26:50 Anything else that you want to discuss today? 15:27:00 yes, I have Q about duplicate key thing 15:27:07 I think there's just a regex that probably needs to be updated, based on previous similar bugs. 15:27:08 Are there plans to fix it as it has been opened for a while? 15:27:44 ajya: I don't know 15:27:53 Looks like it has been open for a while. 15:27:57 yes 15:28:57 Without too digging either, I think that some code around here will fix the issue => https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.db/src/branch/master/oslo_db/sqlalchemy/exc_filters.py 15:29:09 zzzeek might have some input. It's possible this has already come up with sqlalchemy too. 15:29:37 Yes that what I was thinking too 15:29:39 If we can avoid writing a new regex and reuse one from somewhere else that would be ideal. :-) 15:30:04 should we propose a patch or somebody else will take this? 15:30:36 ajya: AFAIK nobody work on that, so feel free to propose a patch 15:30:51 hberaud: ack 15:32:43 Also, if the problem is already fixed on sqlalchemy this implies that the version is supported by openstack/requirements 15:33:41 and I far as I know the latest upgrade isn't yet landed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/788339 15:34:09 so we still rely on sqlalchemy <1.4 15:35:45 ajya: before submitting a patch can you do some tests with sqlalchemy > 1.4? 15:35:57 hberaud: ok, will check 15:35:59 and see if that fix the problem? 15:37:07 I would argue that the requirement bump will be merged soon, so, possibly as said bnemec that will allow us to avoid duplicate code 15:37:22 *duplicated 15:38:00 Anything else? 15:38:43 ajya: let us know if that helped you 15:38:55 ok, thank you 15:39:13 ajya: thank you 15:41:00 OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up. 15:41:03 #endmeeting