15:00:25 #startmeeting oslo 15:00:25 Meeting started Mon Oct 4 15:00:25 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:25 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:25 The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' 15:00:28 Courtesy ping for hberaud, bnemec, johnsom, redrobot, stephenfin, bcafarel, kgiusti, jungleboyj, gmann 15:00:31 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting 15:00:43 o/ 15:00:57 o/ 15:01:06 o/ 15:02:02 #topic Red flags for/from liaisons 15:02:28 I would really like to get some eyes on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/800852 15:02:45 It is needed for Designate and the secure-RBAC work 15:03:01 Ok I'll have a look after the meeting 15:03:26 Thank you 15:03:44 Nothing from Cinder. 15:03:49 nothing AFAIK for Neutron - we were mostly busy on last-minute internal backports for RC2 (so nothing on oslo) 15:04:03 Otherwise nothing from Octavia or Designate 15:04:10 Else nothing that I'm aware of from oslo 15:04:39 #topic Releases liaison 15:05:43 So, we are in the final mile of Xena, so everything is quiet for oslo. I need to check if UVW need some releases 15:05:53 I'll do that once Xena is out 15:06:11 #topic Security liaison 15:07:30 bnemec: I think we need some adjustement on LP for private bugs especially on oslo.metrics 15:08:42 coreycb: Concerning our previous discussion, I forgot to say to you that bnemec is our security liaison. 15:09:11 And I think that's all for the security topic 15:09:23 #topic TaCT SIG liaison 15:09:42 hberaud: great, thank you 15:10:05 You are wekcome 15:10:08 welcome 15:10:46 Concerning the TaCT SIG topic I'll unearth an old topic => http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023939.html 15:11:40 Many of our stable branches (queens, rocky at least) are stucks by this kind of issue ^ 15:13:32 These branches are still in extended maintenance, and they are not yet EOLed. Maybe we should consider EOLing them else we have to fix these issues to restore merging 15:13:42 Any opinion? 15:15:11 I'll start a ML thread about this 15:15:36 I would be ok with EOLing them, but I am not sure how many operators might feel different. 15:15:48 Cinder has been getting fewer and fewer backports that far. 15:15:55 #action hberaud send an email about EOLing queens and rocky on oslo. 15:16:09 ++ I think that is a good approach. 15:16:23 AFAIK all your backports on these branches are stucks 15:17:01 #topic Action items from last meeting 15:17:19 No items are available from the last meeting 15:18:00 #topic Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review 15:18:11 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osprofiler/+/757540 15:18:58 I'll have a look to this one after the meeting too 15:19:09 #topic Open discussion 15:19:32 Anything else to discuss today? 15:19:52 Nothing from me. 15:21:40 I have a few backports (also related to secure RBAC issues) that I hope we can get merged and released. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.policy/+/811508 Wallaby is the most important for me. 15:22:15 ok I'll try to have a look asap 15:23:10 OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up. 15:23:13 #endmeeting