17:15:12 <damani[m]> #startmeeting oslo
17:15:12 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Wed Feb  5 17:15:12 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is damani[m]. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:15:12 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:15:12 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'oslo'
17:15:37 <damani[m]> hberaud, JayF, gmann, tkajinam, meeting time
17:15:49 <damani[m]> hberaud, yes, sorry i was to another meeting
17:15:51 <gmann> o/
17:15:58 <JayF> o/
17:16:05 <hberaud[m]> o/
17:16:47 <damani[m]> so next week it's the feature freeze for oslo
17:17:42 <damani[m]> if you have some patches some need to be merged before, please ping here
17:17:55 <gmann> damani[m]: can you please point me to the agenda? this one? https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/epoxy-oslo-meeting-tracking#L166
17:18:00 <damani[m]> hberaud, checking https://review.opendev.org/q/prefixtopic:%22eventlet-removal%22+deprecate+status:open+author:hberaud@redhat.com
17:18:16 <gmann> I have couple of topic to discuss so wanted to add in agenda also for future reference
17:19:02 <damani[m]> gmann, ok
17:19:08 <hberaud[m]> gmann: yeah that's the right link
17:19:24 <gmann> thanks
17:19:40 <damani[m]> #topic oslo is in PTL election for F (2025.2) cycle
17:20:32 <gmann> so oslo did not meet the DPL criteria to continue next cycle
17:20:34 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/939485
17:20:42 <gmann> and it is up for PTL election
17:21:05 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/940415
17:21:13 <gmann> damani[m]: or anyone else planning to run for PTL?
17:21:41 <damani[m]> ok for the dpl
17:22:12 <damani[m]> gmann, yes why not
17:22:59 <gmann> perfect, thanks damani[m], as nomination is started today, feel free to propose your candidacy
17:23:19 <damani[m]> gmann, ok, i will do it
17:23:55 <gmann> thanks again
17:23:56 <damani[m]> #meeting time in etherpad
17:24:23 <gmann> yeah, this is a request to have exact meeting time/day in etherpad that will be a easy ref to know meeting
17:24:23 <damani[m]> #topic meeting time in etherpad
17:24:41 <damani[m]> not easy
17:24:47 <damani[m]> again we can change the time
17:25:07 <gmann> currently we have to figure out time based on alternate meeting and day also
17:25:08 <damani[m]> but for example tkajinam can't at that time
17:25:28 <damani[m]> gmann, and for you it's hard earlier
17:25:29 <gmann> I mean, if we can write day/time as per when meeting happening.
17:25:35 <gmann> not changing the time
17:25:43 <damani[m]> i can send again a mail to find a new time
17:25:54 <gmann> oh, I did not mean to find new time
17:26:16 <gmann> just to write day/time in etherpad what we already selected
17:26:17 <damani[m]> ok
17:26:34 <damani[m]> you mean instead R-8 (Feb 03 - Feb 07)
17:26:47 <gmann> for example. for this TX meeting we can write 5th Feb 17:00 UTC and for next TZ that day/time
17:26:56 <gmann> s/TX/TZ
17:27:44 <gmann> 'R-8 (Feb 03 - Feb 07)' -> '5th Feb 17:00 UTC'
17:28:36 <damani[m]> yes we can add the time and date
17:29:00 <gmann> thanks, that will be easy for new member also to know exact time
17:29:07 <damani[m]> #topic maintenance of openstackdocstheme
17:30:18 <gmann> this is topic i added in previous meeting but I think it was not discussed yet
17:30:29 <damani[m]> yes right
17:30:34 <gmann> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/epoxy-oslo-meeting-tracking#L94
17:30:51 <gmann> I wrote detail here, it came up in TC meeting last month or long back
17:31:12 <gmann> gtema is volunteering to help to maintain openstackdocstheme
17:31:38 <gmann> I think tkajinam already +1 on the idea in etherpad
17:31:50 <damani[m]> ok
17:31:57 <gmann> if everyone else is ok then I can start the paper work in project-config acl side
17:32:14 <hberaud[m]> I already agreed weeks ago on the etherpad too
17:32:15 <gmann> basically we need to add a new core group for openstackdocstheme where we can add gtema + current oslo-core
17:32:27 <gmann> hberaud[m]: oh, perfect. sorry I did not notice
17:32:34 <hberaud[m]> np
17:32:45 <damani[m]> i have also add my +1 in the document
17:32:49 <gmann> cool
17:33:02 <gmann> I will propose the project-config change and add you all in review along with gtema
17:33:16 <damani[m]> sounds good
17:33:19 <damani[m]> thanks a lot
17:33:24 <gmann> thank
17:33:31 <gmann> that is all form me on this topic
17:33:33 <damani[m]> #topic open discussion
17:34:06 <damani[m]> someone would like to discuss about something else?
17:34:15 <hberaud[m]> nope
17:34:32 <gmann> nothing from me
17:34:41 <damani[m]> ok
17:34:48 <damani[m]> seems we are done for today
17:34:50 <JayF> One quick thing
17:34:56 <damani[m]> yes
17:35:03 <JayF> can we please move forward either https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/930379 or https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/937037
17:35:23 <damani[m]> JayF, looking
17:35:28 <JayF> with ff coming up, that'd be nice to get in for this release and it's been awaiting review for literally months (to the point where someone duped the feature)
17:36:06 <hberaud[m]> ack
17:36:06 <damani[m]> so that one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.utils/+/937037
17:36:10 <damani[m]> is a duplicate
17:36:13 <damani[m]> right?
17:36:50 <JayF> they both do the same thing slightly different ways
17:36:59 <JayF> I obviously prefer mine but more than anything else I want one of them to land :)
17:37:15 <JayF> mine was first but at this point that doesn't matter
17:37:20 <damani[m]> JayF, just i agree with hberaud it better to use f-string now
17:37:42 <damani[m]> JayF, can you change it please?
17:37:45 <JayF> put it on the gerrit review and I'll revise today
17:37:58 <JayF> in a video meeting too and can't multitask that r/n
17:39:33 <gmann> JayF: you are already/always :)
17:40:41 <hberaud[m]> JayF: yours is more complete
17:40:43 <damani[m]> JayF, ok, i will do it
17:42:42 <damani[m]> something else?
17:43:44 <damani[m]> seems we are done
17:43:49 <damani[m]> thanks a lot everyone for today
17:43:57 <damani[m]> #endmeeting