15:30:04 #startmeeting Performance Team 15:30:05 Meeting started Tue Jan 10 15:30:04 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is DinaBelova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:30:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:30:08 The meeting name has been set to 'performance_team' 15:30:25 ok, hello folks :) 15:30:33 o/ 15:30:38 rpodolyaka o/ 15:30:48 akrzos msimonin o/ 15:30:58 tovin07 o/ 15:31:52 let's wait for a few moments to find out if rpodolyaka and I are the only brave souls today to visit this meeting :) 15:32:13 here, hello! 15:32:28 akrzos yay! 15:32:45 o/ 15:32:58 o/ 15:33:11 cool, it looks like we have a quorum :) 15:33:22 so as usually let's start with action items 15:33:27 #topic Action Items 15:33:36 last time we had only one action item on myself 15:34:00 regarding Fluentd option for logs collecting in our monitoring solution 15:34:24 sadly I did not have a chance to discuss it yet as almost all our team was on winter holidays :) 15:34:32 so lemme leave this item for the next time as well 15:34:38 o/ 15:34:41 #action DinaBelova discuss Fluentd option for logs collecting in our monitoring solution 15:34:43 spn o/ 15:34:58 while we're still in this part of the meeting 15:35:33 akrzos msimonin I see you had lots of comments to the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415563/ 15:35:57 any common opinion? akrzos msimonin did you love what we tried to do? :) 15:36:02 yes sure 15:36:04 :) 15:36:56 msimonin please feel free to add more comments or questions - Oleg was going to answer all of them this week 15:37:07 I guess some parts were still missing 15:37:16 (at the time I checke) 15:37:16 msimonin true 15:37:20 checked* 15:37:23 that's why it's still WIP 15:37:27 ok :) 15:37:34 something yet needs to be added and polished 15:37:44 so expect some new versions soon 15:37:58 DinaBelova: It looks good to me 15:38:25 akrzos basically the same relates to you - please expect new version to appear on review :) 15:38:48 ok, so we may jump to the next section 15:38:49 sounds good 15:38:57 #topic Current progress on the planned tests 15:39:06 msimonin the floor is yours :) 15:39:11 ok 15:39:29 So at Inria side we are still interested in multisite deployments 15:39:48 multisite includes multiregion (but not only) 15:40:09 there will be a patch to Kolla to appear soon to add a better support 15:40:18 rcherrueau is working on it 15:40:25 *better support of multiregion 15:41:25 We are currently refactoring some code in our deployment tools to support these new deployment modl 15:41:45 and hopefully this will be done soon 15:42:03 msimonin ack 15:42:34 So it's progressging surely :) 15:42:46 msimonin thanks for the update :) 15:43:20 akrzos sir, any news regarding telemetry testing? :) 15:43:42 I worked on using objecstorage nodes (swift) for the storage driver now 15:43:48 objectstorage* 15:44:06 I had some trouble getting this to deploy correctly and some general tuning 15:44:27 i was able to get it eventually working 15:44:45 and in comparsion to gnocchi with ceph it doesn't look good :( 15:44:58 oh, any numbers? 15:45:22 I think there is more tuning that swift could use however my "leases" on the hardware expired 15:45:49 basiclly with the setup i was able to get running i could only get to ~200 instances before gnochi backlog was growing 15:46:09 without ever decreases and eventually ceilometer collector grows in memory too 15:46:16 until controllers ran out of memory 15:46:36 in comparsion to ceph i got to 1k instances with some small tuning and a large number of metricd workers 15:47:05 oh, it does not look really well 15:47:14 i need to digest all of this data and create some publishable results 15:47:26 already opened one upstream bug around swift 15:47:29 and tripleo 15:47:59 ideally i can get some this digest into performance-docs 15:48:13 so i need that action item 15:48:24 akrzos this will be really cool 15:48:34 #action akrzos add information regarding current telemetry researches progress to performance docs 15:48:36 done 15:48:37 thanks 15:49:00 ok, anything else sir you'd like to share in this section? 15:49:04 how many compute nodes 15:49:14 for the 1k vms arkzos? 15:49:25 akrzos ^^ 15:50:02 10 15:50:06 spn: ^ 15:50:22 so only a 100 instances per compute 15:50:38 over commit? 15:50:44 DinaBelova: nothing else from me for now 15:50:54 spn: yes, these are just idle instances to create load 15:51:03 ok cool 15:51:10 i adjust nova allocation ratios to allow many 15:51:34 i will be adding a scenario to create networks for the instances too 15:51:41 so we can get a bit more complete workload 15:52:24 akrzos thanks 15:52:25 ok, from my side it's not really a week with lots updates, as almost all team was on winter holidays last week :) basically we're going to continue two activities 15:52:27 1) complete all items to performance docs on review 15:53:27 2) continue current workloads testing, that we were not able to finish before new year (with all of those measurements being colelcted + real workloads run against containerized OpenStack to observe the overall cluster health during this action) 15:53:42 collected* 15:54:25 so basically that's all from my side today, nothing to add here 15:54:39 it looks like we may jump to Open Discussions 15:54:43 #topic Open Discussion 15:55:01 rpodolyaka tovin07 any updates regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254703/ ? 15:55:20 Oh yes 15:55:24 http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109725.html 15:55:38 DinaBelova: yeah, we sort of expect people will get to review it tomorrow 15:55:45 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109725.html 15:55:46 cool ! :) 15:55:47 yaaaay 15:55:53 there is +2 +W on the novaclient one 15:55:56 I feel so happy reading this :D 15:56:13 well, I'd say it's a bit early to be happy ;) 15:56:21 let's see how it goes 15:56:24 :v 15:56:28 rpodolyaka well :) at least I see activity around this 15:56:42 and that's something I really love to see :) 15:56:52 heh, me too :) 15:56:59 rpodolyaka tovin07 thank you folks for this activity being pushed so far 15:57:03 np! 15:57:08 let's see how the reviewing process will go 15:57:11 :D 15:57:43 akrzos spn msimonin anything else to share today? 15:57:52 Not from my side 15:57:54 I will be around tomorrow in #openstack-nova 15:58:09 I wanted to add spec topic to the etherpad for our discussion 15:58:25 #info so just a reminder - please add your items to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-performance-team - we'll go through it next time 15:58:25 I think there was more added to the ptg etherpad 15:58:26 spn sure 15:58:32 but I am curious about the interest on it. We in Dell are basically using spec for full performance analysis 15:58:40 of openstack 15:58:46 I will push some patch in magnum later this week to integrate osprofiler with magnum 15:58:53 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/magnum/+spec/osprofiler-support-in-magnum 15:59:18 spn it looks like in this group it's true for you, and I guess Intel folks are using it as well 15:59:32 but others did not have a chance to try it yet 15:59:32 Hope it will be finished in this O cycle 15:59:38 tovin07 ack 16:00:01 spn please add your item anyway 16:00:02 I can give details about it when we meet and also tell how the performance is measured on our architecture 16:00:11 Ok cool 16:00:25 let's have a plan deep dive to spec as well 16:00:40 ok, it looks like we're done for today :) 16:00:42 DinaBelova: sure. thank you 16:01:02 Thanks! 16:01:03 folks, once again - happy to work with you and see you next time :) 16:01:05 bye! 16:01:10 #endmeeting