15:30:01 #startmeeting Performance Team 15:30:01 Meeting started Tue Jan 31 15:30:01 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is DinaBelova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:30:02 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:30:04 The meeting name has been set to 'performance_team' 15:30:13 hello folks :) 15:30:21 spn is here already :) 15:30:28 o/ 15:30:45 hello o/ 15:30:58 akrzos tovin07 rook o/ 15:31:08 o/ 15:31:21 o/ 15:31:23 * tovin07 in a vacation… 15:31:33 o/ 15:31:46 tovin07 msimonin1 o/ 15:31:49 tovin07 ack :) 15:32:23 ok, so let's get started with the action items 15:32:30 #topic Action Items 15:32:38 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/performance_team/2017/performance_team.2017-01-24-15.30.html 15:32:43 last time we had a bunch of them 15:33:13 rook let's start with yours regarding Neutron API Performance results 15:33:27 They are complete, just need to create the rst 15:33:29 and ship it! 15:33:48 rook yay! :) cool, will leave as an action item for the next time 15:34:05 #action rook add Neutron API Performance results to performance docs 15:34:34 msimonin don't you know status of ad_rien 's action item? 15:34:50 regarding the info about OpenStack in a WAN context presentation 15:35:16 yes 15:35:27 sorry my client has some issues 15:35:32 is the method of neutron perf is also included inthe doc? 15:35:44 np sir 15:35:46 DinaBelova: we wrote a proposal 15:35:52 I can share the link 15:36:06 yes please, I think it'll be interesting for people here 15:36:23 https://pad.inria.fr/p/sfBMUvWOpKtmfXT8 15:36:55 msimonin thanks 15:37:15 so lemme create an action item at least on myself to review it - probably I canleave some comments 15:37:24 cool thanks ! 15:37:26 #action DinaBelova review https://pad.inria.fr/p/sfBMUvWOpKtmfXT8 15:37:41 and of course everybody else is also welcome to do so as well :) 15:38:00 ok, so regarding my action items 15:38:13 I've reviewed sai 's and akrzos 's changes 15:38:30 akrzos I belive if no more comments will appear I'll merge it in a few days 15:38:38 as right now it looks good to me 15:38:40 sounds good 15:39:05 sizes on images looks much better, also now i know how to view the preview of it :) 15:39:07 regarding workloads testing status I wanted to share last week 15:39:15 akrzos ;) 15:39:47 sadly our Intel co-dev partners yet do not add clarity on what can be shared and what's not 15:40:29 moreover, it might be a chance that we (Mirantis team) won't be able to use those tests at all (after ~month of working on them) 15:40:40 I hope some clarity will appear this week, but no updates here so far 15:40:50 so I'll leave action item untouched 15:40:59 #action DinaBelova share status of workloads testing methodology/results sharing 15:41:20 and regarding last action item - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/294535/ was merged to keystone :) 15:41:31 so that's a good news 15:41:54 yes 15:42:11 it looks like we may jump to the next section 15:42:30 #topic Current progress on the planned tests 15:42:36 msimonin - the floor is yours :) 15:42:49 ok 15:42:50 :) 15:43:07 To follow up the proposal we have 15:43:42 We discussed with Pierre Riteau (from chameleon cloud) to join the presentation 15:44:49 Second thing is that we have made some validation on using Traffic Control to emulate the delay/bw between nodes 15:44:56 the first set of results are promising 15:45:36 the idea was to check if the way we enfore networkj constraints is consistent with what we expect when using tools like flent 15:46:17 Some people were actually interested in this feature 15:46:32 how were the initial results? 15:46:48 let me link some summary of them 15:46:56 sure 15:47:10 #link https://github.com/BeyondTheClouds/enos/issues/48 15:47:56 ok, thank you sir 15:48:22 so we wanted to make sure that we got the same latency/bw constraints for the dataplane 15:48:29 akrzos would you like to share anything? 15:48:50 msimonin yeah, I see 15:48:55 I'm working on Gnocchi Rally plugins that i'd like to contribute to upstream rally at some point 15:49:23 that is in conjunction with a test plan for scaling further with telemetry services 15:49:24 akrzos good news for Rally :) 15:49:41 Andrei (Rally PTL) loves things being upstreamed :) 15:50:14 I know i just want to make sure what i put together is easy to use/consume before publishing elsewhere 15:50:26 and does what i expect :) 15:50:29 ack 15:50:52 akrzos I've shared your results with LDT lead, but strangely no response yet. I'll double check if I used the right contact, but t was right :) 15:50:54 but idea is to show that Gnocchi is responsive at the high loads vs the older cielometer 15:51:10 yeah I met Matt at the last Summit 15:51:41 akrzos I'll keep you updated if I'll be able to ping him using other channels 15:52:09 ok cool 15:52:20 do you kno wif LDT has a PTG function/event? 15:52:31 akrzos thanks 15:53:24 ok, from Mirantis side we're switching a bit back to k8s itself (from containerized OpenStack on top of it) - we'd like to measure the limitations of k8s control plane to find out how is it responsive with high resource density 15:53:33 akrzos I don't know about it if so 15:53:45 ok cool no worries 15:53:52 I believe some folks will attend, but not as an organized group 15:54:29 going back to our tests - we're going to prepare the environment somewhen this week 15:54:30 and get started with it 15:54:48 at some point we'll switch back to OpenStack on top of k8s 15:55:45 spn btw I've tsarted the initiative of pushing Intel folks 15:55:53 to try SPEC cloud benchmark 15:56:33 Intel is big, so people I'm usually working with and people working on SPEC are not the same :D even not the same department :D 15:56:38 so it goes slow 15:56:39 DinaBelova: thats good 15:57:08 but I think there might be a good chance to agree on something 15:57:16 spn will keep you updated 15:57:21 I am using spec fulltime and I can help folks onboard if needed :) 15:57:38 spn thank you sir :) 15:57:45 This is more of real life use case based performance 15:57:56 I'll keep you updated regarding status of the discussion 15:57:58 DinaBelova: yw 15:58:29 anything else to cover before going to open discussion? 15:58:55 ok, so let's proceed 15:58:56 #topic Open Discussion 15:59:02 earlier I had this question abou the neutron performance rook was mentioning. Is there a document I can read to understand the process of performance 15:59:29 rook can you please give a link to the test plan? 16:00:57 tovin07 I've reviewed bunch of your changes to osprofiler 16:01:13 thank you for lots of improvements :) 16:01:19 yes, np 16:01:28 some yet left on review, I believe I'll go through them this week 16:01:34 thanks :D 16:02:28 spn I believe rook will send you a link once he'll be back :) 16:02:41 DinaBelova: sure 16:03:23 just a reminder - the call for speakers for OpenStack summit ends on Feb 6th 16:03:42 so please do not forget to propose your presentations if there is a wish to 16:03:55 anything else to cover? 16:04:29 it looks like we're done for today :) 16:04:37 thanks everyone for attending :) 16:04:44 bye o/ 16:04:47 thanks 16:04:51 #endmeeting