15:30:04 #startmeeting Performance Team 15:30:05 Meeting started Tue Feb 28 15:30:04 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is DinaBelova. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:30:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:30:09 The meeting name has been set to 'performance_team' 15:30:15 hello folks :) 15:30:20 o/ 15:30:27 o/ 15:30:32 msimonin good evening sir :) 15:30:34 o/ 15:30:34 tovin07_ o/ 15:30:41 rcherrueau \o 15:31:06 Hello DinaBelova :) 15:31:10 let's wait for a few moments 15:31:38 rook akrzos o/ 15:31:42 o/ 15:31:49 \o 15:32:00 ok, it looks like we have a quorum 15:32:02 Hi DinaBelova rook akrozos 15:32:07 hey spn 15:32:21 I believe we won't have many things to discuss today (after the previous week :)) but anyway :) 15:32:26 let's get started 15:32:34 we do not have a ny action items from the last tim 15:32:50 so let's jump to after-ptg-discussion section 15:32:57 DinaBelova: o/ 15:33:01 #topic PTG: etherpads and discussions 15:33:07 akrzos spn \o 15:33:10 spn: o/ 15:33:24 so first of all thanks everyone who attended our first PTG 15:33:41 we have pretty good discussion log right here 15:33:43 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-performance-team 15:34:25 very long story 15:34:29 @@ 15:34:39 I wanted to ask a quick question to people who have attended - both remotely and face to face - do you feel it was a good discussion? What would you add / remove from it? 15:34:44 tovin07_ :D 15:34:45 true 15:35:02 let's start probably with RedHat folks - rook akrzos ? 15:35:46 I think we could of had a bit more discussion regarding sharing results from others (not just RH, Mirantis, (not sure who was the other share)) 15:35:58 Test plan discussions for next release. 15:36:30 rook true. it looks like right now we had a bit short-term discussions mostly 15:37:04 right 15:37:07 #info comment from rook: "we could of had a bit more discussion regarding sharing results from others (not just RH, Mirantis, (not sure who was the other share)). Test plan discussions for the next release" 15:37:16 for a first pass, i think this was a good start to things. 15:37:23 rook thanks for your comments 15:37:45 Inria? msimonin rcherrueau? :) you wee our main remote attendees 15:38:01 I suspect it was not very comfortable with the hangouts, but still 15:38:01 :) 15:38:09 Including remote folks and combining them into discussion was a challenge. Muting/Unmuting mics wasn't nice. The setup caused us a bit of trouble. 15:38:14 I think we have day 1 for release planning (performance/scale) : day 2, how we can execute our planning with our current tooling, or what we might need from the tooling, ie Rally. 15:38:30 Hangouts was fine 15:38:31 #info comment from spn: "Including remote folks and combining them into discussion was a challenge. Muting/Unmuting mics wasn't nice. The setup caused us a bit of trouble" 15:38:57 rook agree, next time it makes sense to modify format a bit 15:39:05 and spend more time for agenda planning 15:40:39 From our side of remote attendees it was fine but I can imagine for you people in the room it was not very confortable 15:40:59 I think Google+ Hangout is good 15:41:03 #info it looks like the main concern about PTG discussion is to spend more time on agenda planning, and have more focus on the perf team future plans. as for the format, it was a bit challenging to work through hangouts muting / unmuting, it might be a good idea to prepare conference microphone if possible for the next time 15:41:11 msimonin ok, thank you 15:41:31 However, China blocks it 15:41:41 tovin07_ it was good by itself, but managing it from the Atlanta was tricky as well 15:41:50 tovin07_ oh, did not realize this issue 15:41:54 tovin07_, china blocks hangouts? 15:42:02 So, in the future, we should care about this 15:42:17 tovin07_ how could we get around the china block? 15:42:22 Yes, China blocks Google, Facebook and some-other-things 15:42:29 does china provide their own Hangout solution 15:42:38 bluejeans might work? 15:42:55 probably zoom is not blocked as well 15:43:01 My teammate (guy from Kolla) using Cisco WebEx 15:43:02 I need to check 15:43:53 Is WebEx free to use ? 15:43:57 Hangout is good for now, but, if we have more developers from China, it will be a problem 15:44:07 #info probably it's worth taking a look not only on the Hangouts as a remote joining solution. China, for instance, is blocking it 15:44:14 msimonin free for joiners :) 15:44:31 ok, thanks tovin07_ 15:44:38 msimonin: I do not have information about that :D 15:44:46 ok 15:44:47 may be we can spend sometime during boston sidelines and work on future agenda 15:45:05 spn yeah, rook has mentioned this as well 15:45:28 that we need more future agenda discussions 15:45:29 DinaBelova, ok cool.I missed that 15:45:40 but good point about Boston summit 15:46:07 spn any comments from you on the passed PTG? 15:47:02 except the ones that you have shared already 15:47:03 I liked the discussions. I would agree for having a discussion on future agenda would be nice. Also if we could invite more cross teams like how we did with Rally folks that would be great 15:47:17 DinaBelova: Did our team take team photos? 15:47:46 tovin07_ sadly no :D I realized that some teams are doing them only on wednesday 15:48:07 when some folks leaved already :) 15:48:08 spn thanks 15:48:19 ok, thanks for sharing the feedback 15:48:32 oh :( 15:49:04 usually we're jumping to the "current testing status" section of the meeting, but I guess last week we had really good discussion on this 15:49:18 so I believe we may go to the "open discussion" directly 15:49:26 #topic Open Discussion 15:50:07 anything to cover folks? From my side that's all, I only wanted to cover some PTG follow-up 15:50:24 this week I will ask my friend in kolla about OSprofiler with Kolla 15:50:44 tovin07_: thanks 15:50:46 tovin07_ ack, please keep msimonin and rcherrueau updated :) 15:50:54 tovin07: cool :) 15:51:05 rcherrueau: msimonin DinaBelova yes :D 15:51:11 tovin07_ ;) 15:51:14 DinaBelova: during the PTG you asked me to open few issues on OSProfiler 15:51:25 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/osprofiler/+spec/osprofiler-engines 15:51:33 rcherrueau yes, I see that you've done it 15:51:36 thank you for this 15:51:40 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/osprofiler/+bug/1666585 15:51:40 Launchpad bug 1666585 in osprofiler "Run OSProfiler during a Rally or Shaker Benchmark" [Undecided,New] 15:52:05 DinaBelova: OK great 15:52:15 rcherrueau I'm going to work on prioritization / triaging this week 15:52:31 let's see if something can be covered more or less quickly 15:52:31 DinaBelova: OK 15:53:01 DinaBelova: did you see Vipin around recently? 15:53:09 tovin07_ sadly no 15:53:13 it's strange a bit 15:53:20 I'll ping him in the email 15:53:25 tovin07_ thanks for reminding 15:53:49 yup 15:54:21 #action DinaBelova ping Vipin on his participance in OSprofiler - he seemed not to be really active last few weeks, need to check if he's going to continue work 15:54:41 because osprofiler work is depends too much on you 15:54:57 tovin07_ I'm thinking on adding one more core contributor :D ;) 15:55:22 anyway 15:55:25 thanks for reminding 15:55:27 that’s a good new :D 15:56:08 anything else to cover today? It looks like we had a quick post-PTG discussion :) 15:56:22 it looks like nope :) 15:56:22 hmm 15:56:27 i think no 15:56:28 :D 15:56:46 thanks everyone for coming / having a good time in Atlanta / taking part in our discussions 15:56:48 bye! 15:56:53 #endmeeting