14:02:11 <esberglu> #startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting 14:02:12 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb 13 14:02:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:02:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:02:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting' 14:02:44 <edmondsw> o/ 14:02:50 <esberglu> #topic In-tree Driver 14:03:30 <esberglu> Only thing I'm aware of for queens is the taskflow name kwarg fix 14:03:46 <esberglu> Looks like that should get in no before rc2 no problem 14:04:27 <edmondsw> cool 14:04:41 <edmondsw> mriedem was ok with the tests? 14:05:13 <esberglu> edmondsw: He hasn't voted yet. But any problem he has should be trivial 14:05:35 <edmondsw> k 14:05:39 <esberglu> Started a WIP for snapshot here 14:05:40 <esberglu> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543023/ 14:05:51 <esberglu> Not quite ready for review yet 14:06:27 <edmondsw> cool 14:06:29 <esberglu> I'll bump you guys when that changed 14:06:37 <esberglu> changes 14:08:14 <esberglu> Anything else before I move on? 14:08:20 <edmondsw> efried just pinged, he's on his way but will be a few more min 14:08:22 <edmondsw> let's move on 14:08:31 <esberglu> #topic Out-of-tree Driver 14:08:58 <edmondsw> esberglu https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537763/ has been sitting with no response to comments for a while. It's a pretty simple thing. Want to take that over? 14:09:17 <esberglu> edmondsw: Sure 14:10:23 <efried> o/ Sorry I'm late guys. 14:10:30 <edmondsw> efried np 14:10:40 <edmondsw> svenkat told me yesterday he was going to address comments in the max capacity commit, but I guess he got held up, maybe today 14:10:45 <edmondsw> no rush there 14:11:18 <edmondsw> I published queens (and a bunch of older releases we'd missed) to readthedocs yesterday 14:11:29 <edmondsw> s/published/activated/ 14:12:05 <edmondsw> I see both of you guys have started looking at the volume refactor. Thanks. I need to take another pass at that today or tomorrow 14:12:31 <edmondsw> I think that's all that's in progress IT 14:12:31 <esberglu> same 14:12:52 <efried> I'm afraid I'm not going to have much confidence in the refactor until it's been certified in live tests. 14:12:52 <edmondsw> s/IT/OOT/ 14:13:01 <edmondsw> efried agreed 14:13:24 <edmondsw> I've been looking pretty closely, but haven't gotten through every line, and even then there is not substitute for testing 14:13:45 <efried> Right, there's no way we can validate that big of a change just by inspection. 14:14:10 <edmondsw> yep, just trying to minimize the impacts when we test, but definitely have to test 14:14:37 <edmondsw> efried he's using the env that I had gotten the PCI devices added to, since that's what I had and you haven't been using it 14:15:10 <efried> wfm 14:15:17 <edmondsw> if/when you need it, let me know 14:16:18 <esberglu> #topic Device Passthrough 14:16:46 <esberglu> efried: Saw that one of your specs got through 14:17:15 <efried> yuh. I'm on the hook to edit the Q NRP spec and then propose remaining NRP work for R. 14:17:33 <efried> Also have a NUMA-handling spec out there that seems to be getting vetoed by Jay. 14:17:51 <efried> What's our NUMA story in Power, anyone know? 14:18:22 <edmondsw> I was asking some folks about that 14:18:40 <edmondsw> what I was told is that PHYP is smart enough to kinda take care of that for you for the most part 14:18:50 <efried> interesting. 14:19:27 <efried> So since that's more of a thing nova cares about than a thing Power cares about, I think Ima back off a little bit and let it shake out however it shakes out. 14:19:29 <edmondsw> can't be as perfect as a user dictating exactly what they want, of course, so maybe something to look at in future, but not a priority atm 14:19:39 <edmondsw> ++ 14:21:25 <edmondsw> next? 14:21:35 <esberglu> #topic PowerVM CI 14:22:52 <esberglu> Once that task fix gets in, thats should take care of almost all failures still hitting us 14:23:09 <edmondsw> cool 14:23:28 <edmondsw> how are things going with the move to pike? 14:23:33 <esberglu> Haven't really touched the pike undercloud upgrade much since last week 14:24:06 <esberglu> Jenkins is still dropping connections to the nodes during the run 14:24:40 <esberglu> And there is 1 issue with the deploy playbooks that I need to fix setting up the mgmt services properly 14:25:24 <esberglu> Hoping that I can have that done and deploy it to production sometime early in rocky 14:25:49 <edmondsw> sounds good 14:26:27 <esberglu> #topic Open Discussion 14:26:32 <esberglu> Anything else today? 14:27:04 <edmondsw> esberglu remind me what we're waiting on to merge 6313&4? 14:27:44 <esberglu> edmondsw: Not everything had a queens branch yet (as of yesterday anyways) 14:27:58 <esberglu> And there isn't logic in our CI scripts to handle that 14:27:58 <edmondsw> what's still not there? 14:28:32 <esberglu> requirements wasn't, haven't checked today 14:28:40 <edmondsw> oh, yeah... I'd asked about that on the ML 14:28:47 <esberglu> Oh it is now though 14:28:51 <edmondsw> cool 14:29:02 <edmondsw> so we can also merge those IT patches that were waiting on that 14:29:23 <esberglu> edmondsw: Let me do a test run with it now that eveything should be working, I'll merge afterwards 14:29:32 <edmondsw> efried can you remove the -W on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/542881/ ? 14:29:36 <efried> ... 14:29:56 <edmondsw> esberglu you had the -W on the other 2 14:30:01 <efried> done 14:30:06 <edmondsw> tx 14:31:16 <esberglu> Have a good week guys. Reminder I'm only in today and tomorrow this week 14:31:19 <esberglu> #endmeeting