14:02:11 <esberglu> #startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting
14:02:12 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb 13 14:02:11 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:02:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:02:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting'
14:02:44 <edmondsw> o/
14:02:50 <esberglu> #topic In-tree Driver
14:03:30 <esberglu> Only thing I'm aware of for queens is the taskflow name kwarg fix
14:03:46 <esberglu> Looks like that should get in no before rc2 no problem
14:04:27 <edmondsw> cool
14:04:41 <edmondsw> mriedem was ok with the tests?
14:05:13 <esberglu> edmondsw: He hasn't voted yet. But any problem he has should be trivial
14:05:35 <edmondsw> k
14:05:39 <esberglu> Started a WIP for snapshot here
14:05:40 <esberglu> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/543023/
14:05:51 <esberglu> Not quite ready for review yet
14:06:27 <edmondsw> cool
14:06:29 <esberglu> I'll bump you guys when that changed
14:06:37 <esberglu> changes
14:08:14 <esberglu> Anything else before I move on?
14:08:20 <edmondsw> efried just pinged, he's on his way but will be a few more min
14:08:22 <edmondsw> let's move on
14:08:31 <esberglu> #topic Out-of-tree Driver
14:08:58 <edmondsw> esberglu https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537763/ has been sitting with no response to comments for a while. It's a pretty simple thing. Want to take that over?
14:09:17 <esberglu> edmondsw: Sure
14:10:23 <efried> o/ Sorry I'm late guys.
14:10:30 <edmondsw> efried np
14:10:40 <edmondsw> svenkat told me yesterday he was going to address comments in the max capacity commit, but I guess he got held up, maybe today
14:10:45 <edmondsw> no rush there
14:11:18 <edmondsw> I published queens (and a bunch of older releases we'd missed) to readthedocs yesterday
14:11:29 <edmondsw> s/published/activated/
14:12:05 <edmondsw> I see both of you guys have started looking at the volume refactor. Thanks. I need to take another pass at that today or tomorrow
14:12:31 <edmondsw> I think that's all that's in progress IT
14:12:31 <esberglu> same
14:12:52 <efried> I'm afraid I'm not going to have much confidence in the refactor until it's been certified in live tests.
14:12:52 <edmondsw> s/IT/OOT/
14:13:01 <edmondsw> efried agreed
14:13:24 <edmondsw> I've been looking pretty closely, but haven't gotten through every line, and even then there is not substitute for testing
14:13:45 <efried> Right, there's no way we can validate that big of a change just by inspection.
14:14:10 <edmondsw> yep, just trying to minimize the impacts when we test, but definitely have to test
14:14:37 <edmondsw> efried he's using the env that I had gotten the PCI devices added to, since that's what I had and you haven't been using it
14:15:10 <efried> wfm
14:15:17 <edmondsw> if/when you need it, let me know
14:16:18 <esberglu> #topic Device Passthrough
14:16:46 <esberglu> efried: Saw that one of your specs got through
14:17:15 <efried> yuh.  I'm on the hook to edit the Q NRP spec and then propose remaining NRP work for R.
14:17:33 <efried> Also have a NUMA-handling spec out there that seems to be getting vetoed by Jay.
14:17:51 <efried> What's our NUMA story in Power, anyone know?
14:18:22 <edmondsw> I was asking some folks about that
14:18:40 <edmondsw> what I was told is that PHYP is smart enough to kinda take care of that for you for the most part
14:18:50 <efried> interesting.
14:19:27 <efried> So since that's more of a thing nova cares about than a thing Power cares about, I think Ima back off a little bit and let it shake out however it shakes out.
14:19:29 <edmondsw> can't be as perfect as a user dictating exactly what they want, of course, so maybe something to look at in future, but not a priority atm
14:19:39 <edmondsw> ++
14:21:25 <edmondsw> next?
14:21:35 <esberglu> #topic PowerVM CI
14:22:52 <esberglu> Once that task fix gets in, thats should take care of almost all failures still hitting us
14:23:09 <edmondsw> cool
14:23:28 <edmondsw> how are things going with the move to pike?
14:23:33 <esberglu> Haven't really touched the pike undercloud upgrade much since last week
14:24:06 <esberglu> Jenkins is still dropping connections to the nodes during the run
14:24:40 <esberglu> And there is 1 issue with the deploy playbooks that I need to fix setting up the mgmt services properly
14:25:24 <esberglu> Hoping that I can have that done and deploy it to production sometime early in rocky
14:25:49 <edmondsw> sounds good
14:26:27 <esberglu> #topic Open Discussion
14:26:32 <esberglu> Anything else today?
14:27:04 <edmondsw> esberglu remind me what we're waiting on to merge 6313&4?
14:27:44 <esberglu> edmondsw: Not everything had a queens branch yet (as of yesterday anyways)
14:27:58 <esberglu> And there isn't logic in our CI scripts to handle that
14:27:58 <edmondsw> what's still not there?
14:28:32 <esberglu> requirements wasn't, haven't checked today
14:28:40 <edmondsw> oh, yeah... I'd asked about that on the ML
14:28:47 <esberglu> Oh it is now though
14:28:51 <edmondsw> cool
14:29:02 <edmondsw> so we can also merge those IT patches that were waiting on that
14:29:23 <esberglu> edmondsw: Let me do a test run with it now that eveything should be working, I'll merge afterwards
14:29:32 <edmondsw> efried can you remove the -W on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/542881/ ?
14:29:36 <efried> ...
14:29:56 <edmondsw> esberglu you had the -W on the other 2
14:30:01 <efried> done
14:30:06 <edmondsw> tx
14:31:16 <esberglu> Have a good week guys. Reminder I'm only in today and tomorrow this week
14:31:19 <esberglu> #endmeeting