21:01:40 #startmeeting product working group 21:01:41 Meeting started Mon Sep 12 21:01:40 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is shamail. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:01:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:01:44 The meeting name has been set to 'product_working_group' 21:01:46 hi everyone 21:01:53 Hi Shamail 21:01:57 Who's here today for the PWG meeting? 21:01:58 Hi 21:02:05 Hi 21:02:25 Agenda for today: 21:02:30 o/ 21:02:30 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team 21:02:34 o/ 21:02:45 Lots of people! 21:02:52 o/ 21:03:24 Let's begin! 21:03:35 hello 21:04:07 #topic Midcycle review 21:04:17 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_8_29_16 21:05:01 If you click on that etherpad link, there is another etherpad: 21:05:06 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG_Newton_Midcycle 21:05:08 :D 21:05:13 are we using phone bridge today? 21:06:01 Hello. 21:06:02 Arkady_Kanevsky: no, just IRC 21:06:07 OK. 21:06:10 Hi rcaballeromx 21:06:21 It was great to see most of folks in NYC 21:06:55 * rcaballeromx is sad he could not be there. 21:06:55 +1 21:07:12 Arkady +1 21:07:14 If you look at the etherpad it has a lot of ARs, very productive midcycle 21:07:16 rcaballeromx - indeed 21:07:46 Does anyone have any questions about the outcomes from that session? 21:08:41 Is there a prioritie list as a result of th midcycle? 21:08:53 *priorities 21:09:38 rcaballeromx: no list as a result but Arkady_Kanevsky got some homework to go review the user survey data to see if there are items in there that align with some of our stories 21:09:56 That would effectively help us add another layer of validation/data to be used for prioritization 21:10:21 Ok, thanks for the clarification shamail. 21:10:22 correct. Had not started on it with Heidi yet. 21:10:39 Np 21:11:42 Okay, does it sound reasonable to check back on the ARs next week and see if the owners made progress? 21:11:51 +1 21:12:16 +1 21:12:17 I can report of a few today 21:12:19 #action Follow up on mid-cycle ARs in next meeting 21:12:31 AR Arkady: Add bare metal use case to this user story. done - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358781/ - this is one item closed 21:12:33 Go for it Arkady_Kanevsky 21:13:08 Here is another - How does this relate to Charge Back/Show Back? 21:13:08 Need to include this in the User Story - AR Arkady - done. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358888/ 21:13:21 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358781 21:13:30 Thanks Arkady_Kanevsky! 21:13:46 If you have time, please review that change so we can merge it! 21:14:31 Above mentiond survey and finally with Leong - Should we create templates for the different stages of our workflow? (Arkady, Leong) 21:14:46 These are 4 AR I got from the very productive meeting 21:15:05 If you need help with editing of the surveys, let me know. 21:15:13 Yes. I see one comment from you Shamail. WIll update today 21:15:50 Thanks np. 21:16:47 Thanks Arkady_Kanevsky and rcaballeromx 21:17:13 Next topic? 21:17:31 #topic Community Generated Roadmap Update 21:17:48 ls 21:18:15 We have formed the roadmap sub-team for this release and the volunteer list has gone down, it looks like we will not cover about 3-4 projects that we have done in the past. 21:19:31 shamail: are we planning to cover those with <10% adoption? 21:19:33 which ones? I haven't volunteerd yet... 21:19:44 The team is collecting information right now and targeting the end of the week to finish this activity 21:20:11 KrishR: only as optional (they are the only ones at risk, good news is we covered most of the significantly adopted ones) 21:21:11 After we collect the data, we will create slides next week to give to the foundation. 21:21:33 They will use the data to discuss/define the release marketing messages 21:21:47 We will also be presenting the roadmap in Barcelona 21:22:08 All in all, lots to do in a short time-frame but we feel confident we can meet the deadlines 21:22:36 shamail: feel free to include me in your efforts if you think I can help. 21:22:52 SHmail, when is deadline for slides? 21:23:02 from individual members for collection 21:23:02 Thanks rcaballeromx, I'll send you the information on how to participate. 21:23:19 Arkady_Kanevsky: it's this Friday (really it is "by Monday") 21:23:42 Works for me 21:24:00 Glad to help shamail. 21:24:11 sorry was away fdor several days, had not cought to all emails yet. 21:24:44 Np 21:25:09 #topic Barcelona BoF/Working Session Planning 21:25:31 Is there anyone here today that will not be able to come to the summit in Barcelona? 21:25:54 Nice :) 21:26:01 shamail: I won't be attending 21:26:23 We have to submit our working group session preferences to the Foundation this week. 21:26:28 Sorry to hear that KrishR 21:26:39 We will be doing two sessions... 21:27:06 Krish will oyu be able to attend via phone bridge for working sessions? 21:27:08 One is a BoF (40 min) that will be used as an introduction to Product WG for people that are interested. 21:27:45 The other session will be a working session (half day) and we will use this session to focus on our goals for Ocata. 21:27:57 Arkady_Kanevsky: yes, i can attend via phone bridge if not an early morning session in Barcelona 21:28:12 The foundation also said that Sunday and Monday are more open than other days... 21:28:34 Let's vote on which days/times work for the most people... 21:28:47 #startvote which day/time works best for BoF? SPM, MAM, MPM, TuAM, TuPM, WAM, WPM, ThAM, ThPM 21:28:48 Begin voting on: which day/time works best for BoF? Valid vote options are SPM, MAM, MPM, TuAM, TuPM, WAM, WPM, ThAM, ThPM. 21:28:49 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 21:28:56 S = Sunday 21:29:00 Monday is full day foundation board meeting 21:29:12 #vote WPM 21:29:31 #vote WPM 21:29:40 #vote ThPM 21:30:10 Anyone else? I'll close the vote soon. 21:30:26 Please let us know if anyone option definitely doesn't work for you 21:30:28 #vote MPM 21:30:38 I can dial in remote 21:30:44 #vote WPM 21:30:46 TuPM in my case is not available at all 21:30:59 Makes sense KrishR 21:31:08 leong_, MeganR? 21:31:28 Going once... 21:31:28 #vote WAM 21:31:33 twice... 21:31:34 sorry - I don't have final from the team, not certain what will work 21:31:38 Done :) 21:31:41 #endvote 21:31:42 Voted on "which day/time works best for BoF?" Results are 21:31:43 WPM (3): shamail, Arkady_Kanevsky, rcaballeromx 21:31:44 WAM (1): leong_ 21:31:45 MPM (1): KrishR 21:31:46 ThPM (1): MadhuKashyap 21:31:59 Alrighty, let's do the same for the half-day working session... 21:32:04 actually i am flexible except Wednesday PM (due to presentation) 21:32:13 #startvote which day/time works best for working session? SPM, MAM, MPM, TuAM, TuPM, WAM, WPM, ThAM, ThPM 21:32:14 Begin voting on: which day/time works best for working session? Valid vote options are SPM, MAM, MPM, TuAM, TuPM, WAM, WPM, ThAM, ThPM. 21:32:15 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 21:32:32 #vote ThPM 21:32:33 Leong, that was BoF so only 40 min... When is your session? We can try to avoid it 21:32:42 #vote ThPM 21:32:42 #vote ThPM 21:32:52 #vote ThPM 21:33:09 Wed 26 3:05pm-3:45pm & Wed 26 5:55pm-6:35pm 21:33:18 WHat is the time slots before I can vote. Is it 5-9:00pm? 21:33:20 #vote ThPM 21:33:30 shmail: if you avoid it.. i'm free all :-) 21:33:31 #info avoid Wed 3:05 and 5:55P slots for BoF 21:33:45 We'll see if we can avoid it 21:34:06 Anymore votes on Working Session? 21:34:12 Going once... 21:34:17 Twice... 21:34:25 Done! 21:34:29 #endvote 21:34:30 Voted on "which day/time works best for working session?" Results are 21:34:31 ThPM (5): shamail, MadhuKashyap, leong_, rcaballeromx, KrishR 21:35:03 #agree Try for BoF on Wed (avoid 3:05, 5:55) and Thurs. PM for half-day working session. 21:35:10 +1 21:35:35 #topic Planning for Forum 21:36:06 There is an upcoming change that will start at the Boston summit regarding the design summit scheduling/objectives 21:36:46 nice picture - https://www.dropbox.com/s/t3p3dc0stljsx88/diagram.png?dl=0 21:37:12 The linked diagram was created by Thierry to give an overview of the change 21:37:54 In general, what this means for our perspective is that the user and technical committees will both share creating the Forum agenda 21:38:30 MeganR brought up a good point when we were talking in NYC about this change that we should ensure the schedule covers both tactical and strategic topics 21:38:56 WhAt are we using term Forum for? 21:39:10 To this end, we think it would be a good idea for the Product WG to share some thoughts with the user committee on how we could maximize the user feedback achieved during these forum events. 21:39:25 Forum is what will replace the "design summit" starting in Boston 21:39:34 Forum == Design Summit of today 21:40:19 So the product WG will meet both at Forum and and the summit? 21:40:21 We would like to ensure we have time to discuss this in the UC before Barcelona because we're sure the topic will come up while there. 21:40:38 No, we will meet at the summit but our teams could also meet in the forum 21:40:47 For example, a user story could be a topic in the forun 21:40:50 Forum* 21:41:05 fyi roadmap preso is th 2:40-3:20pm 21:41:10 Forums will allow a meeting space for items that could be cross project 21:41:15 Thanks Rockyg 21:41:17 Do we know where Operator summit lands? 21:41:27 We'll try to work around that if possible 21:41:33 Unchanged 21:41:43 Ops Summits will still happen at the normal cadence 21:41:59 so operator summit is at summit. We should be align to it. 21:42:27 The request for this topic at the moment is to identify if others are interested in helping craft a topic that we could bring to the next UC meeting (9/19) to get the conversation on Forum Planning started. 21:42:39 Any volunteers? So far Carol and I. 21:43:19 Shamail, my concern that for O-release we only have 4 weeks for any user stories we can drive. 21:43:21 I might be available. Not sure, but include me in the email 21:43:22 I can help - figure we will meet later this week 21:43:40 Adn to my understanding most of O-release is bug fixes and little functionality 21:43:59 Please, include me on email also. I will try to make it 21:44:12 I can also help. 21:44:22 Arkady_Kanevsky: this topic is different from our stories... Our plans for Ocata will be discussed in Barcelona 21:44:30 shamail: i'll work my suggestions thru Carol 21:44:41 We are generally volunteering to help with this because we have thoughts :) 21:45:05 thoughts - I like it! :) 21:45:14 4weeks -> 4 months 21:45:28 Sounds good, I'll send a doodle poll to MeganR, Rockyg, rcaballeromx, and Carol 21:45:35 shamail: i'll discuss this with Cartol, but would like to know where the UC is with reagards to Day 2 Ops - do they want OpenStack to venture into this space or prefer not? 21:45:41 Carol* 21:45:43 #action schedule meeting to discuss Forum proposal to UC 21:46:16 I think the UC would be interested if there is common interest in the community 21:46:16 add me to it, shamail 21:46:23 Will do Arkady_Kanevsky 21:47:17 I would suggest discussing it with emagana and also capturing how it's a need that's different from LDT, Faulty Genes, Logging/Monitoring, etc. 21:47:35 ok, thx shamail: 21:47:48 ++ 21:48:25 KrishR: I think it will also depend by what we mean by "venture"... UC only has working groups, if we want to discuss whether a project makes sense then that might be a conversation with TC or the OSOps team (if it's just scripts, etc) 21:48:39 * shamail realizes I just gave you three different options to pursue 21:48:44 sorry :) 21:49:01 np :) 21:49:16 #topic open 21:49:29 That's all we had on the agenda.. Any topics that anyone wants to discuss? 21:49:55 good fee me 21:50:01 fee-> for 21:50:07 I'm good 21:50:20 bye everybody 21:50:21 * rcaballeromx has no opens this week. 21:50:41 Good bye eveyone. 21:50:42 ttfn 21:50:43 thanks for running is shamail 21:50:49 +1 21:50:50 Awesome! 21:50:55 YW Arkady_Kanevsky 21:51:03 have a great day/evening everyone! 21:51:12 #endmeeting