21:02:04 <ttx> #startmeeting project
21:02:05 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 18 21:02:04 2012 UTC.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:02:06 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:02:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'project'
21:02:10 <ttx> Agenda @ http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
21:02:16 <ttx> 9 days to final release
21:02:20 <ttx> tick tick
21:02:26 <ttx> #topic Actions from previous meeting
21:02:35 <ttx> * ttx to create Folsom Release Notes base wiki page: DONE
21:02:54 <ttx> #link http://wiki.openstack.org/ReleaseNotes/Folsom
21:03:05 <ttx> only a few notes from Keystone so far
21:03:13 <heckj> still have some formatting to do
21:03:26 <ttx> * notmyname to go through 1.7.0 features and target blueprints accordingly: DONE
21:03:34 <ttx> #topic Keystone status
21:03:39 <ttx> heckj: o/
21:03:48 <ttx> Keystone had its RC1 published last Friday
21:03:57 <heckj> yeah!!
21:03:58 <ttx> Let's look at the list of folsom-rc-potential bugs:
21:04:02 <ttx> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bugs?field.tag=folsom-rc-potential
21:04:16 <ttx> quite empty I see
21:04:20 <ttx> So... no release-critical issue warranting a RC2 yet ?
21:04:25 <heckj> we've a couple on python-keystoneclient that probably apply - haven't tagged them yet
21:04:34 <heckj> ttx: correct - no changes in keystone itself
21:04:54 <ttx> python-keystoneclient is not interlocked with core release, so nm
21:04:59 <heckj> cool
21:05:00 <ttx> Note that there was one bugfix in master:
21:05:03 <ttx> Bug 1050406
21:05:04 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1050406 in keystone "get_users on tenant retrieves duplicated entries on LDAP backend" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1050406
21:05:17 <ttx> heckj: I'd say it's not worth triggering an RC2 ?
21:05:32 * heckj reads
21:05:38 <heckj> correct
21:05:43 <ttx> heckj: Cool. anything else ?
21:06:18 <ttx> Questions about Keystone ?
21:06:48 <heckj> I'm good
21:06:57 <ttx> #topic Swift status
21:07:08 <ttx> There was a release-critical bug discovered in Swift 1.7.0 so we'll do a 1.7.2
21:07:19 <ttx> That's the version that will be in Folsom unless more shit happens.
21:07:25 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.7.2
21:07:46 <ttx> afaik that bugfix should be the only change from 1.7.0
21:07:54 <ttx> Questions on Swift ?
21:08:25 <ttx> #topic Glance status
21:08:29 <ttx> bcwaldon: heya
21:08:37 <ttx> Glance had its RC1 published last Friday
21:08:38 <bcwaldon> hey
21:08:49 <ttx> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bugs?field.tag=folsom-rc-potential
21:09:08 <ttx> So you'd like to do an RC2 with those 3 ?
21:09:14 <bcwaldon> ttx: I did run into one problem - if I add that tag to https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1050661 then it affects multiple projects
21:09:15 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1050661 in quantum "Default for qpid_heartbeat should be increased" [High,Fix committed]
21:09:18 <russellb> 4 ... i just tagged one for consideration
21:09:57 <ttx> bcwaldon: no big deal, we'll convert those to RC2 soon enough
21:10:05 <bcwaldon> ok, whatever
21:10:07 <ttx> bcwaldon: Is that list complete or do you want to add more ?
21:10:15 <bcwaldon> ttx: I'm not going to commit to it right now
21:10:19 <bcwaldon> ttx: so assume it will change
21:11:12 <ttx> bcwaldon: ok, you can propose backports to milestone-proposed and i'll check that they are not too insane for a RC2
21:11:20 <bcwaldon> ttx: great, that'll work
21:11:31 <bcwaldon> ttx: note that two potentials havent landed in master
21:11:39 <bcwaldon> ttx: and one doesnt have a fix yet
21:11:51 <ttx> the one you really can't release with is.. ?
21:11:58 <ttx> bug 1012820 ?
21:11:59 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1012820 in glance "Diablo->Essex migration breaks Nova image_ref" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1012820
21:12:09 <bcwaldon> ttx: *really don't want to release without"
21:12:12 <bcwaldon> yes
21:12:24 <ttx> #info Glance RC2 window opening
21:12:25 <bcwaldon> ttx: but the one russellb just filed looks critical
21:12:37 <russellb> yeah, sorry about that :-/
21:12:41 <bcwaldon> I'll sync up with eglynn about it
21:12:44 <ttx> bcwaldon: i'll create a RC2 milestone asap
21:12:48 <bcwaldon> russellb: I'm glad you filed it!
21:12:50 <ttx> after meeting
21:12:51 <bcwaldon> no need to apologize
21:12:56 <bcwaldon> ttx: ok
21:13:02 <ttx> bcwaldon: Anything else ?
21:13:11 <bcwaldon> negative
21:13:15 <ttx> Questions on Glance ?
21:13:46 <ttx> bcwaldon: https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/folsom-rc2 <-- here
21:13:52 <bcwaldon> cool
21:14:07 <ttx> you can start targeting and removing folsom-rc-potential tag from bugs you target there
21:14:15 <bcwaldon> ok
21:14:17 <ttx> #topic Quantum status
21:14:22 <ttx> salv-orlando: hey
21:14:25 <salv-orlando> Hi I'm standing in for danwent tonight
21:14:32 <ttx> So we did a RC1 last Wednesday, and opened up a RC2 window recently
21:14:37 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/folsom-rc2
21:14:46 <ttx> salv-orlando: That's a large list already - all safe fixes ?
21:15:01 <salv-orlando> I put fixes up to rc2 following these criteria:
21:15:05 <salv-orlando> 1) readme changes
21:15:21 <salv-orlando> 2) changes which break plugin functionality in an obvious way
21:15:31 <salv-orlando> 3) really critical fixes
21:15:56 <salv-orlando> only 3 patches have a diff larger than 10 lines
21:16:16 <ttx> salv-orlando: so same reamrk as for Brian: you can propose backports to milestone-proposed. i'll doublecheck that the corresponding fix landed in master and that the fix is not too insane for the week before final, and approve
21:16:34 <salv-orlando> perfect.
21:16:48 <ttx> salv-orlando: Is that RC2 list complete, or do you already plan to add more ?
21:16:51 <salv-orlando> We also have bugs still not in the rc2 list, as we're currently investigated them
21:16:58 <ttx> ok
21:16:59 <salv-orlando> very heisenbuggs
21:17:10 <salv-orlando> it's bug 1050512
21:17:11 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1050512 in quantum "qr port of br-int is not set vlan after I restart machine and then restart quantum components" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1050512
21:17:15 <salv-orlando> and bug 1051679
21:17:15 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1051679 in quantum "Error running ip netns command with l3-agent" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1051679
21:17:35 <ttx> on folsom-rc-potential list. Awesome
21:17:39 <salv-orlando> Apart from that, that is all from the land of Quantum.
21:17:41 <ttx> salv-orlando: Anything else ?
21:17:45 <ttx> Questions on Quantum ?
21:17:45 <salv-orlando> Documentation work is progressing fast
21:17:54 <salv-orlando> API doc published on docs.openstack.org
21:18:01 <ttx> jgriffith: around ?
21:18:11 <jgriffith> yup
21:18:17 <ttx> #topic Cinder status
21:18:25 <ttx> Cinder got its RC1 out earlier today
21:18:32 <ttx> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.tag=folsom-rc-potential
21:18:46 <ttx> bug 1052598
21:18:46 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1052598 in cinder "cinder-manage import DB should check nova DB level" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1052598
21:18:55 <ttx> jgriffith: that one warrants a RC2, right ?
21:19:01 <jgriffith> I think so yes
21:19:11 <ttx> ok let's open
21:19:15 <jgriffith> It will cause havoc if not
21:19:18 <ttx> Anything you would add to RC2 from: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED
21:19:46 <jgriffith> Nope, not yet
21:19:57 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/folsom-rc2
21:20:18 <ttx> and targeted 1052598 to it
21:20:29 <jgriffith> Works for me
21:20:33 <ttx> jgriffith: Anything else ?
21:20:37 <jgriffith> I may re-investigate https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1008866
21:20:39 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1008866 in nova "Creating volume from snapshot on real/production/multicluster installation of OpenStack is broken" [Medium,In progress]
21:20:45 <jgriffith> Other than that.. nothing else
21:20:54 <ttx> Questions on Cinder ?
21:21:31 <ttx> #topic Nova status
21:21:36 <ttx> vishy: hi!
21:21:49 <vishy> hi
21:21:51 <ttx> Nova does not have any release candidate out yet :/
21:21:56 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/folsom-rc1
21:22:23 <ttx> 5 targeted bugs left
21:22:41 <ttx> vishy: could we at least cut the release branch today, and backport the last targets ?
21:22:52 <vishy> yes i think we can do that
21:22:59 <vishy> there is some stuff merging now
21:23:03 <ttx> ok, let's do that just after meeting
21:23:04 <vishy> so cut at the end of the day?
21:23:29 <ttx> we can do that in your late evening, yes
21:23:55 <ttx> let's have a quick look at those bugs
21:24:01 <ttx> bug 1052670
21:24:01 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1052670 in nova "scheduler rpc API needs to be updated" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1052670
21:24:12 <vishy> the link was missed
21:24:12 <russellb> that patch was approved, on its way in
21:24:15 <vishy> just put it in
21:24:21 <russellb> oops
21:24:22 <russellb> sorry
21:24:28 <vishy> :)
21:24:39 <russellb> maybe i can beat jenkins and fix it ...
21:24:53 <vishy> russellb: maybe
21:24:53 <ttx> jenkins can't be BEATEN
21:24:57 <ttx> bug 1048842
21:24:58 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1048842 in nova "resource_tracker prevents oversubscription" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1048842
21:25:21 <ttx> This one still looks under discussion ?
21:25:46 <vishy> ttx: yes we are just discussing it. It is scary but we've also seriously regressed oversubscription
21:25:58 <vishy> ttx: that is the only one we are still debating
21:26:11 <ttx> ok, checking the others real quick...
21:26:18 <ttx> bug 1049099
21:26:19 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1049099 in nova "XenAPI: cannot add/remove host to hypervisor pool" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1049099
21:26:42 <vishy> owner is squshing and making one modification. Should go right in once that is done
21:26:59 <vishy> if he doesn't have a new patch up by the morning, one of core will grab it and do it
21:27:05 <ttx> bug 1052052
21:27:06 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1052052 in nova "Quota reservation leaks when volume failed to schedule" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1052052
21:27:20 <vishy> russellb is going to rebase that patch on top of the one he just made
21:27:23 <vishy> then we will put it through
21:27:28 <russellb> working on that now
21:27:32 <ttx> bug 1052670
21:27:32 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1052670 in nova "scheduler rpc API needs to be updated" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1052670
21:27:34 <russellb> it's a PITA conflict
21:27:49 <vishy> ttx: that is the first one
21:27:50 <ttx> ah already done
21:27:58 <ttx> and bug 1050997
21:27:59 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1050997 in nova "Some server attributes are not de-serialized from XML during create" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1050997
21:28:25 <ttx> should be in anytime now
21:28:25 <vishy> so the fixes for those are all being merged
21:28:33 <vishy> except for block_device_mapping
21:28:45 <vishy> i will make a separate bug and make it folsom-rc-potential
21:28:47 <ttx> ok, looks like this list is under control, except maybe 1048842
21:28:50 <vishy> not a release blocker imo
21:29:11 <ttx> #action vishy, ttx to cut release branch at EOD, hopefully RC1 tomorrow
21:29:34 <ttx> vishy: Anything else ?
21:29:46 <vishy> ttx: nope
21:29:52 <ttx> Questions on Nova ?
21:30:30 <ttx> #topic Horizon status
21:30:36 <gabrielhurley> ttx: hi
21:30:36 <ttx> gabrielhurley: hey
21:30:43 <ttx> Horizon has RC1 out since last Wednesday. We have an RC2 cooking though:
21:30:48 <ttx> #link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/folsom-rc2
21:30:49 <gabrielhurley> only one new bug added: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1050807
21:30:50 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1050807 in horizon "Translations should be updated" [Medium,In progress]
21:30:57 <ttx> gabrielhurley: any progress on that translations merge ?
21:30:58 <gabrielhurley> whoops
21:31:05 <gabrielhurley> that one is in progress. I'll have it done today
21:31:12 <gabrielhurley> new bug was https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052677
21:31:13 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1052677 in horizon "Error when clicking on OpenStack logo" [Medium,In progress]
21:31:18 <gabrielhurley> and that one's merging currently
21:31:37 <ttx> gabrielhurley: don't forget to propose backport to milestone-proposed
21:31:38 <gabrielhurley> I'll put up reviews for both to milestone-proposed this afternoon
21:31:40 <gabrielhurley> yep
21:31:42 <ttx> ack
21:31:50 <ttx> will review them first thing tomorrow morning
21:31:53 <gabrielhurley> cool
21:31:59 <ttx> (just a sanity check)
21:32:06 <gabrielhurley> other than that things are still looking good.
21:32:30 <ttx> yes, should have that RC2 soon enough
21:32:35 <ttx> I see nothing on https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bugs?field.tag=folsom-rc-potential
21:32:45 <ttx> gabrielhurley: anything else ?
21:32:52 <gabrielhurley> nope, not at the moment
21:32:57 <ttx> Questions for Horizon ?
21:33:20 <annegentle> does "Translations should be updated" also apply to openstack-manuals?
21:33:43 <annegentle> might be a clarkb question
21:33:57 <ttx> annegentle: no, it's just the strings in code
21:34:28 <ttx> we have translations happening in Transifex but they were never merged into a releasable tarball
21:34:49 <annegentle> okay
21:34:51 <ttx> #topic Other Team reports
21:35:00 <ttx> annegentle: wanna do a doc update ?
21:35:02 <annegentle> sure
21:35:23 <annegentle> #info annegentle bringing in all the nova api samples updated in the nova code base to api.openstack.org
21:35:28 * ttx is knee-deep in RC mud and hasn't had a chance to look up doc status
21:35:41 <annegentle> #info look for a new design on docs.openstack.org in the next week, probably before release
21:36:39 <ttx> annegentle: how much work is needed before you consider that doc is in a release-ready state ?
21:36:45 <annegentle> openstack-manuals still has 30 high importance bugs, hyper-v info in review now, and we'll keep "master" open for folsom updates past the code release dates
21:36:58 <ttx> ok, that answers my question
21:37:15 <ttx> annegentle: is progress fast enough so that it sounds doable to close those 30 high in one week ?
21:37:22 <annegentle> 110 bugs total, which is higher than I like to maintain, but also good that people are reporting doc bugs
21:37:40 <annegentle> ttx: no, the 30 high won't be closed in a week, so we'll keep the branch open, we did that for essex also
21:37:46 <ttx> right
21:38:08 <annegentle> I'll do a detailed mailing list post tomorrow for deep detail status
21:38:20 <ttx> cool, thx
21:38:24 <ttx> annegentle: anything else
21:38:26 <ttx> ?
21:38:39 <annegentle> #help Please review doc patches at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-manuals,n,z
21:38:45 <annegentle> that's it for now
21:39:02 <ttx> Any other team lead with a status report ?
21:40:25 <ttx> #topic Open discussion
21:40:31 <ttx> #info TC nominations under way, closing EOD Wednesday !
21:40:35 <ttx> Anything else, anyone ?
21:41:14 <heckj> ttx yeah
21:41:26 <annegentle> Keep the Summit proposals coming!
21:41:30 <heckj> quick question - is there a place to see all the folks currently nominated for TC?
21:43:14 <annegentle> we could start a wiki page?
21:43:29 <ttx> heckj: nothing but the ML archive :)
21:43:37 <ttx> We could add to the elections wikipage
21:43:54 <ttx> #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/TCElectionsFall2012
21:44:21 <annegentle> ttx: sounds good, I'll edit based on what I saw on the ML?
21:44:26 <russellb> IIRC so far it's annegentle, mikal, comstud, and me
21:45:06 <ttx> annegentle: yes
21:45:22 <annegentle> on it
21:45:29 <ttx> annegentle: only add confirmed people -- i.e. the list russell said
21:45:36 <ttx> anything else ?
21:45:56 <russellb> annegentle: thanks!
21:46:59 <ttx> #endmeeting