21:02:15 <ttx> #startmeeting project
21:02:16 <openstack> Meeting started Tue May 27 21:02:15 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:02:17 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:02:20 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'project'
21:02:24 <ttx> Very short agenda today...
21:02:31 <ttx> #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
21:02:37 <ttx> #topic News from the 1:1 sync points
21:02:50 <jeblair> and i'm totally not bringing anything up here today
21:03:00 <mestery> jeblair: :P
21:03:20 <ttx> Combined log of the 1:1s sync from today:
21:03:27 <ttx> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-05-27-13.13.html
21:03:34 <ttx> Was a bit chaotic since I was traveling today
21:03:50 <ttx> #topic Other program news
21:04:02 <ttx> It was suggested that programs without an integrated project shall also have space to proclaim their news
21:04:04 <notmyname> ttx: swift feature freeze during the storage policies merge will most likely start tomorrow
21:04:19 <ttx> #info swift feature freeze during the storage policies merge will most likely start tomorrow
21:04:24 <notmyname> thanks :-)
21:04:27 <ttx> Would a standing item at the beginning of this meeting work ?
21:04:29 <ttx> jeblair: ^
21:04:32 <ttx> annegentle: ^
21:04:35 <ttx> mtreinish: ^
21:04:44 <mtreinish> ttx: yeah that's fine for me
21:04:45 <jgriffith> o/
21:05:28 <jeblair> ttx: that's fine, but i sort of figure we can add things to the agenda
21:06:00 <ttx> jeblair: you should feel free to edit that wikipage
21:06:03 <dolphm> ttx: could also be a special open-ish timeslot in #openstack-relmgr-office so it's archived as part of the other "news"
21:06:23 <ttx> dolphm: hmm, we could do that too
21:06:45 <ttx> if I find a time where they could all join if they want stuff included
21:06:58 <ttx> jeblair, mtreinish: would you prefer that ?
21:07:06 <SlickNik> o/
21:07:06 <dolphm> how long before this meeting is the last 1:1?
21:07:13 <SlickNik> sorry running a bit late on meetings.
21:07:38 <jeblair> ttx: that seems weird to me...
21:07:47 * SergeyLukjanov lurking
21:08:06 <jeblair> ttx: i mean, the 1:1s are for you to coordinate with ptls on detailed deliverable times/progress/etc
21:08:09 <mtreinish> ttx: I'll defer to you and jeblair I don't have an opinion on this :)
21:08:12 <jeblair> i don't really have that need
21:08:18 <ttx> jeblair: right
21:08:39 <ttx> I think hte idea is that you could get stuff in the ptl_sync summary
21:08:58 <ttx> but then probably better to #info your stuff during the meeting directly
21:09:12 <ttx> ok, let's try a standing item at start of meeting
21:09:20 <annegentle> sorry for the delay, yes, that's fine
21:09:24 <ttx> and we'll revisit if tha tdoesn't work
21:09:33 <ttx> #topic Open discussion
21:09:42 <eglynn> quick question about juno-1 ...
21:09:49 <ttx> That's actually all we had on the agenda
21:09:52 <ttx> eglynn: shoot
21:10:00 <eglynn> does the new fasttrack tag-driven milestone release process buy us an extra couple of days dev time?
21:10:06 <eglynn> i.e. instead of calling time for landing patches by EoD Monday
21:10:14 <eglynn> ... that gets pushed out to say EoD Wednesday of the milestone week?
21:10:32 <ttx> eglynn: the idea is that you can call the tag anytime between Tuesday and Thursday
21:10:47 <eglynn> ttx: cool
21:10:53 <ttx> so yes, that can buy you a couple of days if needed
21:11:01 <ttx> I epect that will mostly be useful for Feature Freeze
21:11:08 <ttx> since j1 and j2 don't matter that much
21:11:15 <eglynn> yeah, for j-1 especially
21:11:23 <eglynn> cool, got it
21:11:35 <dolphm> ttx: does it have to be the latest hash?
21:12:28 <dolphm> i guess it doesn't matter too much, nevermind!
21:12:38 <ttx> dolphm: not really
21:13:43 <ttx> Anything else, anyone ?
21:14:53 <ttx> well then
21:14:55 <ttx> #endmeeting