09:00:28 #startmeeting ptl_sync 09:00:28 Meeting started Tue Dec 16 09:00:28 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:29 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:32 The meeting name has been set to 'ptl_sync' 09:00:32 #topic Heat 09:00:40 https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/kilo-1 09:01:00 so... what's left 09:01:07 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-snapshot 09:01:07 just some bugs 09:01:20 oh you markes that one implemented already 09:01:36 ttx, refresh 09:01:36 just chatted to the author and it's done 09:01:37 so.. bugs. 09:01:43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1401929 09:02:02 pending on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141444/ which is marked WIP 09:02:25 ttx yeah we have 2 days right? 09:02:32 max 2 days yes 09:02:47 so i can give them a day to progress? 09:02:54 sure 09:03:05 then ditch if needed 09:03:10 there are not many 09:03:21 just checking if they are likely to make it 09:03:33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1295536 for example does not seem to belong in that category 09:03:43 no movement on it since July 09:04:09 we should at least move to to kilo-2, if not untarget it 09:04:16 agree, just moved to k2 09:04:34 been moved over sionce.. icehouse-rc1 09:04:44 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1301314 09:04:48 yeah 09:04:56 same for that one 09:05:39 no recent activity on it either, no reason to block on it 09:05:40 yeah, i should remoev the in progress 09:05:48 ttx that gone 09:05:56 https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1396917 09:06:20 ok, this one has a review up and relatively recent activity, let's keep it 09:06:43 although i'd rate it "unlikely" too :) 09:06:46 cool 09:06:50 https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1402472 09:06:55 this one is fresh and active 09:07:16 OK, let's block on those 3, and we'll adjust as we go 09:07:29 yip, only 3 in progress now 09:07:30 ok 09:07:37 looks good to me 09:08:01 since you're ahead of me in earth rotation, we can close it on your Thursday evening 09:08:07 which is my Thursday morning 09:08:19 that would be great, just moved house 09:08:26 around same time as now on Thursday 09:08:29 feeling worn out 09:08:34 ok 09:08:55 alright! Thanks and talk to you later 09:09:04 later 09:09:38 * ttx needs to send reminder for cross-project meeting, too 09:10:05 johnthetubaguy: around? 09:10:11 ttx: yes 09:10:13 #topic Nova 09:10:17 johnthetubaguy: hi! 09:10:31 https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/kilo-1 09:10:35 Time for the big cleanup 09:11:05 and try to focus review time on those that are just around the corner 09:11:09 yeah, that time was last week, and mikal said he would do that for me, I will try finish that off 09:11:25 johnthetubaguy: would you like to have some time to do it now ? We can talk in a few 09:11:50 been out last week and yesterday, just got back to my desk this morning 09:12:01 We can talk an hour from now if that helps 09:12:06 probably better for me to churn through these and get back to you 09:12:09 since mikal can't make it 09:12:10 yeah, that should work 09:12:13 thanks 09:12:21 alright, talk to you in ~one hour then 09:12:34 ack 09:12:36 * ttx can use the extra time too 09:12:39 * johnthetubaguy applies coffee 09:12:46 oh, good idea. 09:12:51 * ttx fetches coffee 10:09:00 johnthetubaguy: knock knock 10:10:12 ttx: hey, still churning through 10:10:28 johnthetubaguy: I can give you a bit more time, and knock again in 20min 10:10:37 lots of people on #openstack-nova spotted me 10:10:48 you triggered a panic I hope 10:11:08 ttx: sadly its not related 10:11:45 johnthetubaguy: now or in 20min, your call 10:12:05 ttx: sorry, yeah, 20 mins would be better, sorry 10:12:11 np 10:38:12 johnthetubaguy: how about now ? 10:38:42 ttx: looking better now, whats the link to your magic spot implemented blueprints tool? 10:38:51 http://status.openstack.org/release/ 10:39:12 but refreshed every 30min I think 10:39:51 cool 10:39:58 nothing stands out as implemenetd there 10:40:10 yeah, I am going to do a manual check 10:40:17 seems the topic might be missing on quite a few of those 10:40:42 so those are the ones that are supposedly on review 10:41:06 * ttx checks out the bugs to see if there are stale ones 10:41:15 seems nova-pagination is probably complete 10:41:43 oh, those bugs can probably all be kicked out, except pci-passthrough 10:41:56 but its worth a check 10:42:33 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266962 not really in progress, moving 10:42:56 will only keep those with a review + pci-passthrough 10:42:59 yeah, I moved it to kilo-2 10:43:01 yeah 10:43:05 just not done the bugs yet 10:43:32 not sure what to do of https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1368260 -- seems partially fixed and stale 10:44:08 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1316271 stale, moved to k2 10:44:50 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1383465 -- probably worth prioritizing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131321/ up just in case it can make it 10:45:09 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1385480 stale, moved to k2 10:45:46 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266262 has seen no activity, so k2 it is too 10:46:35 I don't think https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1368260 will make it either 10:46:46 it's either already fixed or k2 10:47:34 yeah, looking at that 10:48:37 parsing BP list now 10:49:03 I think there are loads of these that need to get kicked out too 10:49:10 only done the first pass there 10:49:28 but I hope to review some now ish, in the hope they could make it 10:49:48 just checking for obvious stale ones 10:50:25 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-meta-try-system-meta-before-glance -- a bit unclear what this hinges on 10:51:16 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/anti-affinity-on-migration -- same question 10:52:47 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-smbfs-volume-support might be completed 10:53:03 see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131734/ 10:53:26 yeah, they look a bit messed up 10:53:29 same for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-pagination 10:54:17 and same https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vmware-spbm-support 10:54:57 and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/virt-driver-cpu-pinning 10:55:14 all the other ones have clear, open and active reviews 10:56:14 so maybe prioritize checking on those 6 10:57:07 and we can do another status check tomorrow morning ? 10:57:29 sounds like a plan 10:57:43 I will review those, in the hope of working out whats happening 10:57:56 I bet the last 4 are complete :) 10:58:03 and the first 2 won't make it :P 10:58:11 ok, have a good day! 10:58:24 yeah, I think you probably right 10:58:34 catch you tomorrow 12:01:10 ttx, I happen to be online early to deal with the sqlalchemy thing so if you want to chat now we can 12:59:35 eglynn: o/ 12:59:52 dhellmann: missed your ping, I guess you'll be on in 20min 13:00:10 ttx: hey 13:00:13 #topic Ceilometer 13:00:37 #link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/kilo-1 13:01:03 so we have left... 13:01:05 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/notification-coordination 13:01:08 so looking good, once we get notification-coordination landed (a couple spurious failures in the tests) 13:01:27 I've bumped the declarative-http-tests to kilo-2 13:01:44 That's the two reviews at: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/notification-coordination,n,z 13:01:46 ? 13:01:48 chdent had down an initial spike, but not enough progress to double down on it for k1 13:02:10 yep, that's the ones 13:02:21 ok... and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1393328 13:02:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141698/ 13:02:41 Once those 3 merge I'll ping you and confirm we are good to go 13:02:49 yep, pretty trivial, we'll get that landed today I hope 13:02:54 coolness 13:03:04 if not done by tomorrow we'll rediscuss 13:03:36 yep, shouldn't come to that 13:03:46 sounds good. Questions ? 13:03:55 none from me 13:04:11 ok then, we are all set 13:04:22 cool, thanks for your time :) 13:05:47 SergeyLukjanov: around? 13:19:44 dhellmann: around now ? 13:22:48 ttx: here 13:23:01 #topic Oslo 13:23:06 https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/kilo-1 13:23:16 2 blueprints still open 13:23:22 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo-incubator/+spec/graduate-oslo-context 13:23:35 yeah, we're waiting on some requirements stuff to land for tooz to be finished 13:23:40 was that completed ? or should we move it to k2 ? 13:24:01 and the context thing is waiting on one patch, let me look if that's done 13:24:12 dhellmann: do you have the link to the tooz requirements change ? Maybe I can help it 13:24:14 no, that patch is WIP 13:24:30 it's in the work items in the blueprint 13:24:37 both of them 13:24:37 ok 13:24:44 they won't land until we fix the sqlalchemy issue 13:24:59 but if you approve them, I can force them through after that blockage is fixed 13:25:18 the 2nd is already approved 13:25:30 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140920/ is +2/aprv so should be ok. Let me review the other one 13:25:50 pretty straightforward 13:26:12 ok, so how about we keep tooz in scope, and move context to k2 ? 13:27:13 ok. I thought thursday was the deadline, and assuming we can ever land anything I expect to get that to land this week 13:27:34 well, if you think it can make it in the next day, we can wait 13:27:44 I'll go ahead and move it up 13:28:22 quick look at oslo-incubator changes to see if we can tag now or if there are things you'd like to wait on 13:28:28 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo-incubator+status:open,n,z 13:28:50 Looks like there are a few things that could still make it with extra reviews today 13:28:54 I'm not aware of anything other than removing the context code that we need to worry about 13:29:12 I expect to be spending all day dealing with the setuptools/sqlalchemy/oslo.db thing so I don't plan to do any oslo reviews today 13:29:35 dhellmann: hm, how about we talk again tomorrow and decide then ? 13:29:46 looks like we'll see clearer at that point 13:30:10 yeah, that sounds like a good plan -- sorry, this sort of surprise always seems to come up around a milestone, doesn't it? 13:30:21 well, otherwise it's not fun 13:30:26 heh 13:31:25 about stable branches 13:31:40 I pushed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141769/ so that there is an oslo-stable-maint team 13:31:52 ok 13:32:02 (part of the "let's create project-specific stable review groups" effort) 13:32:13 I haven't been able to get anyone to volunteer to be part of that, so I may just have to add it to the core responsibilities 13:32:16 https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/544,members 13:32:29 I added the ones that were previously part of openstack-stable-maint 13:32:40 ah, cool, that's good enough then 13:32:55 let me know if you want someone else. We'll brief them with stable policy and add them 13:33:10 ttx, sorry, I've been a bit later today, waiting for empty slot 13:33:13 should overall be a lot more scalable 13:33:35 dhellmann: that's all, I'll let you handle oslo.db now ;) 13:33:41 questions ? 13:33:58 ttx: no, I hope to have good news by the time we get to the project meeting but we'll see how it goes 13:34:18 ack 13:34:25 SergeyLukjanov: o/ 13:34:34 ttx, hi 13:34:39 #topic Sahara 13:34:42 https://launchpad.net/sahara/+milestone/kilo-1 13:34:54 ttx, sorry about being late 13:34:59 two bugs still open 13:35:06 https://bugs.launchpad.net/sahara/+bug/1378967 13:35:11 ttx, the cleanup is done and mostly everything planned merged 13:35:21 unfixed for 2 months, any reason to think it will suddenly get better ? 13:35:42 ttx, nope, both issues low prio 13:35:48 ttx, moving them to k2 13:35:52 Should we move them over and tag now ? 13:36:00 ttx, hopefully there will be no new issues for k1 13:36:05 anything in the pipe you'd like to wait for ? 13:36:24 ttx, let me check 13:36:46 or we can wait tomorrow morning and catch anything that will land until then 13:37:14 ttx, I think everything is ok now but I prefer tomorrow morning 13:37:33 ok! 13:37:58 ttx, no questions from my side 13:38:17 ttx, thank you 13:38:35 SergeyLukjanov: ok! 13:38:40 thanks 13:40:09 SergeyLukjanov: just add to kilo-1 page if you find anything blocking 15:01:47 ttx: here and waiting 15:01:55 mestery: o/ 15:02:02 #topic Neutron 15:02:17 https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/kilo-1 15:02:45 quite a few things still opened 15:02:55 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/services-split 15:03:05 anything left to do there before it's considered done ? 15:03:09 Nope, it's done 15:03:13 I just marked it complete now :) 15:03:17 Was waiting for final word from doug this morning 15:03:20 And just got it in neutron meeting 15:03:27 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ovs-dvr-vlan 15:03:49 Kilo-2 15:03:50 just moved it 15:03:51 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131800/ merged, so may be complete ? 15:04:01 * mestery looks 15:04:10 Ah 15:04:12 that was the spec 15:04:13 ;) 15:04:16 The code is delayed a bit 15:04:18 oops 15:04:18 so kilo-2 it is 15:04:21 ok 15:04:34 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-api-and-objmodel-improvement 15:04:43 That one *may* be done, I'll figure out this morning yet 15:04:49 I need to talk to blogan this morning 15:05:01 There are a LOT of reviews listed there :) 15:05:02 Lots of stuff still open @ https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/lbaas-api-and-objmodel-improvement,n,z 15:05:14 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/report-ha-router-master 15:05:29 same here 15:05:41 Yes, I'll defer this one now 15:05:46 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ml2-cisco-nexus-mechdriver-providernet 15:06:02 probably k2 too 15:06:06 yes 15:06:35 So, once I get a handle on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-api-and-objmodel-improvement we'll be good to go 15:06:51 there is a long list of bugs too, should be untargeted unless they are really close or you would like ot block on them 15:07:18 or maybe wait until tomorrow to clean it up 15:07:18 ttx: Yes, it's likely I'll untarget the ones which won't merge 15:07:25 I'll take a crack today and finalize tomorrow 15:07:31 You'll cut the release tomorrow then? 15:07:33 ok 15:07:51 we need to discuss a few things about the neutron-*aas 15:08:01 Ready and waiting 15:08:16 we said we would tag with same versions and attach tarballs to neutron milestone page 15:08:48 we'll need to enable a few pre-release pipe jobs to make that happen 15:09:01 Ah, ok, cool, that makes sense 15:09:02 because currently nothing will happen on tag 15:09:11 :) 15:09:17 I'll propose a zuul layout change and ping you to +1 it 15:09:31 Perfect, please do 15:09:58 The other questiojn is about the stable branches. The neutron-*aas repos have stable/juno and stable/icehouse defined, although it doesn't make any sense there 15:10:10 are you fine with us clearing them out ? 15:10:34 Yes, that makes perfect sense, we brough them over to preserve history, but there will be no releases on those branches for services, so clearing it out makes sense. 15:10:39 neutron-*aas stuff for stable/juno is actually in neutron stable/juno 15:10:45 yes 15:10:46 ;) 15:11:00 ok, that will clarify, we don't really want stuff to be proposed there 15:11:22 OK, I'll make both happen 15:11:32 awesome, thanks! 15:11:51 let me know when things are OK to tag. Otherwise I'll talk to you tomorrow 15:12:06 Perfect, works for me, thanks ttx! 15:12:09 mestery: thx! 15:18:35 mestery: https://review.openstack.org/142126 15:19:10 ttx: +1 15:19:44 thx 15:23:43 thingee: ready when you are 15:24:06 thingee: hi 15:24:12 ttx: rather hi :) 15:24:15 #topic Cinder 15:24:30 https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/kilo-1 15:24:42 Loads of stuff still open in there 15:24:53 Let's see if we can separate the chaff from the wheat 15:25:23 and keep those that can make it in the next coupld days 15:25:24 yeah, so good news, four of those have +2/A...just failed yesterday because of a series of gate issues. 15:25:45 let's quickly go through all of them 15:25:49 ok 15:25:52 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/db-migration-tests 15:26:25 waiting in gate..failed jenkins 15:26:41 Do you need https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141414/ as well ? 15:26:46 (nice number) 15:27:05 no 15:27:08 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/filtering-weighing-with-driver-supplied-functions 15:27:18 I can push that to k-2 15:27:31 ok 15:27:36 done 15:27:50 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/dell-storage-center-block-storage-driver 15:28:05 Looks like it could make it 15:28:25 yup. had enough iterations on code review 15:28:28 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/volume-type-description 15:28:48 failed in gate..recheck is happening now 15:29:05 only needs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131871/ ? 15:29:25 yes 15:29:26 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/quobyte-usp-driver 15:29:38 waiting on a dependency review 15:29:49 otherwise approved 15:30:03 ok 15:30:11 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/srb-driver 15:30:48 may make it 15:30:50 I guess 15:30:50 can make it. enough iterations on it already 15:31:00 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/backup-notification 15:31:09 in gate 15:31:23 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/violinmemory-v6000-storage-drivers 15:31:44 unlikely, but may make it 15:32:09 agreed 15:32:12 same for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/huawei-storage-drivers 15:32:52 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/huawei-sdshypervisor-driver ... may make it I guess 15:33:16 sds hypervisor will make it. 15:33:36 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/open-vstorage-volume-driver is pretty close 15:33:53 agreed 15:34:00 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cloudbyte-elastistor-cinder-driver 15:34:13 hmm, not sure where that one is 15:34:53 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/oracle-zfssa-nfs-cinder-driver looks a bit unlikely 15:34:54 yeah. I don't think that one has a chance for k-1 15:35:04 yup. a bit slow on responding back 15:35:25 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/symantec-nfs-cinder-driver looks doable 15:35:32 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/storpool-block-driver 15:35:42 .. in gate 15:35:56 and finally.. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/lvm-driver-for-shared-storage 15:36:09 heh 15:36:13 that's a special one. 15:36:19 hmm, yes 15:36:29 no one is sure on the use case. not looking good honestly 15:36:40 because no one has reviewed it as a result. 15:36:56 we just got cert results for it yesterday too 15:36:59 might be bumped 15:37:05 ok 15:37:27 Looks like they still ahve a chance, but by tomorrow we'll bump most of them 15:37:59 https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1401137 -- not sure what to do with this one... is it likely to be closed ? 15:38:12 maybe when storpool-block-driver merges ? 15:38:23 oh, I'll untarget that 15:38:31 I don't know why people do that with cert results 15:38:34 alright! 15:38:57 what do you plan to do with those who will miss k1 ? Delay them until L ? 15:39:20 or grant k2 dribver exceptions case by case ? 15:39:23 so there was a point in my mailing list post that drivers close to being merged will be granted into for reviews in k-2 15:39:41 ok 15:39:58 so not too much tears to be expected tomorrow 15:40:14 right, it wouldn't be fair. 15:40:36 Also might let us close tomorrow rather than Thursday, less pressure 15:40:51 Will ping you tomorrow (in your morning) to see where we stand 15:40:53 I'll see that it happens 15:41:04 sure 15:41:13 ok, questions ? 15:41:17 nope! 15:41:27 ok then, have a nice day! 15:41:35 have a nice evening 15:41:44 next we have.. david-lyle 15:41:53 o/ 15:42:06 #topic Horizon 15:42:07 https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/kilo-1 15:42:17 3 Bps still open 15:42:23 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/heat-topology-display-improvement 15:42:41 just need reviews on all 3 15:42:45 Looks like it could make it to the finish line 15:42:54 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/glance-metadata-definitions-base-admin-ui 15:43:19 that one is larger, and may need another patch, but it would be nice to get in k-1 15:43:32 yeah, feels further away, been there forever 15:43:42 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/make-batchaction-help-text-configurable 15:44:04 two reviews, pretty close 15:44:22 OK, we'll see what goes in tomorrow and if we can tag then 15:44:27 on the bugs side... 15:44:29 sure 15:44:48 anything that needs ot get in k1, or we can defer anything that misses the tag ? 15:44:53 to* 15:45:15 all can defer to k-2 15:46:16 ok, sounds good. You can send me a SHA when you're happy, or we can talk again tomorrow and see 15:46:33 ok, I can send you the SHA 15:46:34 questions on your side? 15:47:14 no 15:47:39 ok the, have a good day! 15:47:43 then,* 15:48:00 after the holidays, I'd like to have a dicussion on policy in the cross-project meeting, but I'm not ready for that yet 15:48:31 ok, sure.. just add tto the wiki page when ready (at least one day before if you want it on the agenda) 15:49:07 ok, will do, thanks 15:49:36 talk to you later 15:49:49 same! 16:52:18 notmyname: around? 16:56:36