14:04:43 #startmeeting puppet-openstack 14:04:44 Meeting started Mon Jan 26 14:04:43 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is crinkle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:04:45 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:04:47 The meeting name has been set to 'puppet_openstack' 14:05:07 #topic Review last week's Action items 14:05:31 EmilienM: update on vancouver proposal? 14:05:40 crinkle: yep 14:05:55 mfisch, mdorman and I are proposing a talk 14:06:30 #action Emilien to update https://etherpad.ring.enovance.com/p/vancouver-summit-proposal-upgrades with a new proposed talk 14:06:42 oops wrong link 14:07:26 #undo 14:07:39 #action Emilien to update https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-vancouver-summit-proposal with a new proposed talk 14:07:54 crinkle: it's about puppet openstack modules and real use-cases 14:08:08 sounds good 14:08:33 bogdando: around? 14:08:57 crinkle: reading http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-01-12-14.00.html - you had to send communications to ML - any update? 14:10:06 I did not send an update on the mailing list, will do 14:10:17 cool 14:10:36 #link Talk #1 with mfisch mdorman & emilien https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/xfrye9phZc 14:12:15 #topic open discussion 14:12:51 anything else to bring up? 14:13:28 crinkle: I have something 14:13:28 One thing 14:13:40 Few weeks ago EmilienM mentionned trello/story board in the ML 14:13:48 dprince: ping 14:14:13 are people using any one of those ? If so would you guys agree we mode action items to a card / item on those software ? 14:14:18 EmilienM: hi 14:14:24 So it is easier to get in an oingoing effort 14:14:42 dprince did some interesting work on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147954/ - we need a review from core team and if merged, follow this way to patch all other modules 14:14:46 be able to take a part of an effort, follow it, etc... 14:14:58 one thing at a time 14:15:00 spredzy: ML showed us low interesting on this 14:15:07 interest* 14:15:23 if we setup an tool like this and we are only 3 at using it, it's not useful I think 14:15:24 EmilienM: yes, once that lands (and we agree on a good pattern) I'm up for pushing this around to other modules as well 14:15:43 I think it's the sort of thing that's not very interesting in the abstract :) 14:15:43 storyboard seems too unstable at the moment and trello was controversial 14:16:28 +1 for storyboard == not we currently need 14:16:58 crinkle, can't we start with a 'controversial' tool and later eventually move into storyboard ? I mean there are several effort moving forward in //, and it will be good to have a grasp on what's going on, a global overview, avancement etc.. 14:17:00 be ableto jump in 14:17:14 currently, this is a litle bit hard I think 14:19:01 +1 for trying out Trello 14:20:13 shall we vote? 14:20:17 seem's the only solution no, so +1 too 14:20:30 +1 14:20:34 :) 14:21:04 #startvote Should we try out Trello? 14:21:05 Begin voting on: Should we try out Trello? Valid vote options are Yes, No. 14:21:06 Vote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts. 14:21:20 #vote Yes 14:21:28 #vote Yes 14:21:32 #vote No 14:21:44 usually, only core people can vote 14:21:50 it's like this in OpenStack projects 14:21:59 :/ 14:22:22 hum… 14:22:43 but for this decision not only core people will use trello 14:23:06 it's up to you guys, I just "say it" 14:23:13 #vote No 14:23:36 * crinkle abstains 14:24:10 EmilienM: since it was your idea I'm not going to vote against you 14:24:21 crinkle: I'm voting against my idea :-) 14:24:29 right 14:24:29 I don't think it's a good idea, since we are not enough. 14:24:36 crinkle: feel free to vote 14:24:42 #vote No 14:25:10 look at how much we are in meetings, on IRC, and in contributions - to use trello we have to be at least ~9 guys working full time 14:25:28 I think this can be a part of why we are so little 14:25:35 but it's not the case 14:25:36 its hard to have an overview of whats going on 14:25:41 I thought it was a good idea but in fact I reverted by position. though we can start using it, it's costless 14:26:06 who's working on what, how can I help someone taking a simple item, etc... 14:26:11 encouraging participation 14:26:12 we can setup one and see how it works 14:26:23 spredzy: we have LP for it 14:26:27 bugs/BP 14:27:15 LP doesn't allow one to work in a worflow maneer but still fair point for the bugs 14:27:42 seems like we're still undecided, let's move on and take it to #puppet-openstack later 14:27:49 +1 14:27:50 crinkle: +1 14:27:56 back to dprince's patch? 14:29:12 EmilienM: dprince can you explain why EmilienM's comment about constructing identity_uri won't work? 14:30:06 crinkle: sure, I suppose my thought is that this just duplicates the legacy behaviour already in python-keystoneclient's auth_token middleware 14:30:32 crinkle: this behavior logs a deprecation warning... to encourage users to actually start setting identity_uri 14:30:45 that would make sense 14:31:07 crinkle: so the goal here would be to encourage the same things while not duplicating I guess 14:31:14 crinkle: what is doing is the root cause of many troubles if you miss it 14:32:11 sounds good to me 14:33:26 ok, dprince and I will take care of this 14:33:42 #action dprince & emilien to patch other modules with identity_uri support 14:33:48 yep seems good 14:33:50 thanks! 14:34:07 okay 14:34:09 anything else? 14:34:10 crinkle: for trello, if spredzy thinks that could bring new contributors, we can let him set it up and see how it works 14:34:38 again it's costless 14:34:41 I can take the action, I'd be pleased 14:34:48 spredzy: go ahead 14:34:52 spredzy: go ahead 14:35:11 #action spredzy sets up trello, and make every action of this meeting a card 14:35:13 #action spredzy will set up a trello to try out 14:35:15 oops 14:35:23 \o/ 14:35:31 spredzy: thanks! 14:35:34 héhé, /kill clone msg :) 14:36:01 okay, let's wrap up 14:36:05 #endmeeting