17:00:14 #startmeeting qa 17:00:15 Meeting started Thu Jan 10 17:00:14 2013 UTC. The chair is jaypipes. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:18 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:00:21 welcome all. 17:00:25 jaypipes: hi 17:00:37 jaypipes:hi 17:00:49 mlavalle: hi miguel 17:00:52 Hi everybody 17:00:54 hi 17:01:03 zyluo: hi! 17:01:10 davidkranz: around? 17:01:11 sdague: ? 17:01:22 jaypipes: sdague can't make it today 17:01:25 jaypipes: Here. 17:01:25 kk 17:02:13 * jaypipes would like to thanks everyone, including ravikumar_hp and mtreinish for closing out bugs and updating blueprint statuses. very helpful. 17:02:40 unfortunately, we struggled yesterday diagnosing (but I think now fixed) issues with transient failures 17:03:02 those failures seem to be cleared up now, and jenkins is straining with a big backlog of full tempest runs to complete. 17:03:54 #topic open reviews 17:03:56 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest,n,z 17:04:16 ravikumar_hp: wanna give a quick status on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/18775/ ? 17:04:54 just one more review/approval is needed 17:05:04 it looks good. can you approve 17:05:56 jaypipes: 17:05:56 all review feedback incorporated. and Jenkins also ran fine 17:06:00 ok, will do a final review on that shortly... 17:06:05 ravikumar_hp: thx 17:06:37 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19033/ is still being discussed on the mailing list and with lifeless 17:08:23 zyluo: how are we on reconciling all the quantum tempest efforts? 17:08:42 yeah we have to sync up today 17:09:05 zyluo: you and maru? 17:09:18 so well work together on the two BPs and when things get sorted out I'll send out a mail 17:09:22 mlavalle, 17:09:43 jaypipes: I sent an email earlier this week with an inventory of Quantum BP's 17:09:44 didn't get to talk with maru yet 17:09:53 jaypipes: are we going to include quantum tests nightly/gated tests? 17:10:03 mlavalle: indeed, sorry I have not had a chance to respond :( 17:10:23 jaypipes: I think it is close to be comprehensive 17:10:31 ravikumar_hp: I'd like to ASAP. 17:10:48 ravikumar_hp: they are run as non-voting jobs already, but only quantum smoke tests... 17:11:30 jaypipes: thanks 17:11:32 ravikumar_hp: please respond to my email with the BP's you have, so we complete the inventory 17:12:10 mlavalle: sure. will check 17:12:22 jaypipes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19154/ is ready when everyone else is 17:12:53 clarkb: cool, thx :) 17:13:42 clarkb: I'll include this in the Quantum inventory 17:14:22 alright folks, everyone please try to do as many reviews as you can on the remaining outstanding reviews, and mark "recheck" for stuff that seems to be stuck on unrelated failures. 17:14:44 I'll try to do my best to get through reviews today, but I'm stuck in lots of meetings (starting soon) 17:15:17 unless anyone objects, I'd like to wrap up this week early, so if anyone has particular topics to discuss, please do bring them up now. 17:15:43 jaypipes: I will get to some reviews. 17:15:51 jaypipes: i have one topic 17:15:56 jaypipes: I've got a quick update on coverage reports 17:16:02 writing negative tests 17:16:48 in order, mtreinish please update, then ravikumar_hp 17:17:09 ok, https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/periodic-tempest-devstack-coverage-vm-full/ the daily jobs are running now. (but failing on an import error) 17:17:30 once that error gets sorted out we'll have daily full tempest runs with coverage reports 17:17:43 they get put in the logs directory for the run 17:18:46 very nice. 17:18:49 looking forward to this. 17:19:48 jaypipes: yeah so am I, its been a long time coming 17:19:48 ravikumar_hp: ? 17:19:53 jaypipes: We wanted to parameterize rather than writing negative/boundary tests using some tool . Any update? 17:20:17 ravikumar_hp: no, it's slipped and slipped. 17:20:48 jaypipes: ok 17:20:58 ravikumar_hp: do you have resources that could work on fuzz testing tool like randgen? 17:21:16 jaypipes: we will explore 17:21:26 ravikumar_hp: thx 17:21:50 ok folks, anything else on the docket? 17:21:59 i have a quick question, is anyone in this meeting using the tests under tempest/stress/ ? 17:22:35 jesusaurus: davidkranz is. 17:23:09 I haven't been using them in a while. I was waiting for the "errors in logs with successful runs" bugs to be fixed. 17:23:18 ++ 17:23:19 okay, i'll sync up with him at some point. i have some tests of my own i want to merge in 17:23:38 and i want to discuss the general framework as well 17:23:41 jesusaurus: that will help 17:23:45 jesusaurus: Please do. 17:24:36 davidkranz: ping me when you have some time to discuss the stress tests' architecture 17:24:37 OK, see you all next week, sorry for the shortened meeting. 17:24:46 #endmeeting