#openstack-meeting: qa

Meeting summary

1. 1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting (mtreinish, 17:00:59)
   
   
2. Removing nose support (mtreinish) (mtreinish, 17:02:14)
   1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72040/ (mtreinish, 17:02:43)
   
   
3. Blueprints (mtreinish, 17:08:48)
   
4. Nova v3 testing in scenario tests (andreaf) (mtreinish, 17:15:37)
   1. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/nova-v3-api-tests (andreaf, 17:16:35)
   2. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/nova-v3-api-tests (mtreinish, 17:16:44)
   3. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/nova-v3-api-tests (andreaf, 17:16:44)
   4. https://github.com/openstack/python-novaclient/blob/master/novaclient/client.py#L458 (afazekas, 17:23:18)
   5. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/make-tempest-pluggable (vponomaryov, 17:25:51)
   
   
5. make tempest pluggable bp (mtreinish, 17:25:58)
   1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62429/ (exceptions) (vponomaryov, 17:26:17)
   2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/69985/ (config) (vponomaryov, 17:26:17)
   
   
6. Neutron testing (mtreinish, 17:33:50)
   
7. API tests in the Neutron tree (marun) (mtreinish, 17:38:52)
   
8. Graduation requirements for incubated project w.r.t Tempest (malini) (mtreinish, 17:51:57)
   1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63449/ adds a basic API test. I am hoping this will meet our graduation req as far as tempest goes. But the TC wording is really vague on what is good enough. So wanted to get some thoughts on if additional API tests & scenario tests can be a WIP while/after we graduate. (malini, 17:52:27)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. mtreinish (96)
2. marun (43)
3. sdague (27)
4. dkranz (23)
5. mkoderer (23)
6. vponomaryov (21)
7. andreaf (19)
8. malini (16)
9. mlavalle (10)
10. afazekas (9)
11. SergeyLukjanov (3)
12. openstack (3)
13. sand2rock (1)