17:00:52 #startmeeting qa 17:00:54 Meeting started Thu Sep 25 17:00:52 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mtreinish. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:55 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:58 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:01:08 hi who's here today? 17:01:12 hi 17:01:14 y0 17:01:16 o/ 17:01:16 o/ 17:01:20 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_September_25th_2014_.281700_UTC.29 17:01:23 ^^^ Today's agenda 17:01:54 hi 17:02:11 ok, let's get started 17:02:17 #topic Specs Review 17:02:37 so I don't think there's been any change here, I haven't seen any new specs proposals 17:02:51 andreaf: and sry I haven't gotten a chance to look at ssh-auth yet 17:03:03 mtreinish, np 17:03:20 does anyone have a pending spec review they'd like to bring up? 17:04:13 I think I'm going to drop this topic from the agenda until kilo opens up 17:04:34 +1 17:04:36 because I don't see anymore specs going through until we're into summit planning 17:04:36 mtreinish, sounds good 17:04:41 ok let's move on 17:04:49 #topic Blueprints 17:05:02 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/juno 17:05:23 so I've seen some good progress on bps the last week 17:05:34 does anyone have any updates on an open bp? 17:05:37 yes 17:05:49 well as masayukig is probably not here 17:06:06 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/post-run-cleanup 17:06:08 for the tempest-client-scenario one, all tests are now migrated 17:06:17 I should be done with one more iteration around doc changes 17:06:19 andreaf: \o/ 17:06:50 Any more comments before I push another patch set are welcome 17:07:13 dpaterson: so, when I took a quick look before it looked good. But realize that a patchset that big is very reviewer unfriendly 17:07:24 so it might be a while before it gets approved 17:07:47 dpaterson, I'll try to have a look tomorrow 17:07:54 tx 17:08:45 ok, does anyone else have a bp to bring up? 17:08:49 mtreinish: regarding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/tempest-client-scenarios 17:09:12 mtreinish, I now started the cleanup phase, there's a nice series of patches up for review 17:09:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/tempest-client-scenarios,n,z 17:09:52 andreaf: yeah, those will be good to land. We can finally get rid of those official workaround paths 17:10:06 it's 1500 LoC less in tempest 17:10:22 next #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/resource-cleanup 17:10:55 well, sort of. You're not really counting that you duplicated a lot for the tempest client base scenario test classes :) 17:10:55 I posted the first series of patches, a few already merged, others going through the gate, more pending review :) 17:11:13 mtreinish: yes you're right 17:11:22 mtreinish: but it sounded good ;) 17:11:54 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:+bp/resource-cleanup,n,z 17:12:31 and finally regarding test accounts bp #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/test-accounts 17:12:44 I solved the issues with the non-isolated jobs 17:12:45 andreaf: once we get the resource cleanup stuff landed and dpaterson's cleanup tool we can start catch leaked resources in the gate easily which will be awesome 17:13:21 yes that will be really nice to have 17:14:09 gmann had some concerns on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107685 which I addressed, so the patch is going through check again, but then it should be ready for merge 17:14:47 andreaf: ok, I'll try to take a look at that today 17:15:05 and once scenario migration and test accounts and resource cleanup are done I'll resume work on the multi auth bp 17:15:19 resource cleanup first part I mean 17:15:23 andreaf: heh, don't you have enough on your plate? :) 17:15:46 there's the second bit of the resource cleanup to be done, but I'll go around and ask for help for that one 17:16:43 that's all I have on bps 17:16:55 ok does anyone else have a bp to discuss? 17:17:44 oh, I did want to bring up tempest-lib 17:18:06 right now we're blocked on using tempest lib because of global requirements freeze 17:18:36 for example: https://review.openstack.org/117649 can't pass the gate until kilo opens for global requirements 17:19:15 so I was curious what thoughts were on open CLI test framework patches (I think there are some) 17:19:42 I'm thinking we should block everything until kilo opens and move it to tempest-lib 17:20:20 does anyone have any thoughts on this? 17:20:22 one of the resource cleanup patches is for CLI tests as well 17:21:08 I'd be fine with waiting, only I cannot really enforce the hacking rule until all patches merge 17:21:22 andreaf: hmm, well that should be harmless I think that can land without issues. I'll just have to rebase the migration patch 17:21:23 I could do an exclusion rule for CLI 17:21:38 mtreinish: ok 17:21:48 it was more for functional changes to the cli framework. Like around bringing up the clients or the api around calling them 17:22:02 the patch above shows what it looks like after we move to the lib 17:23:19 well, I won't start -2 anything until yet :) but I thought I should bring it up. 17:23:35 ok if there aren't any bps to discuss let's move on 17:24:24 #topic Devstack 17:24:33 dtroyer: are you around? 17:25:35 mtreinish: sorry, I'd have to leave now, do you have anything else specific for me? 17:25:40 does anyone else have anything to discuss about devstack? 17:26:02 andreaf: nope your bps were probably it 17:26:30 mtreinish: ok 17:27:09 ok well lets move on we can come back to devstack if dtroyer shows up 17:27:18 #topic Grenade 17:27:39 sdague, jogo: anything new on the grenade front this week? 17:28:25 I've seen some patches from EmilienM on javelin2 improvments 17:28:26 not really 17:28:34 sdague: ok, thanks 17:28:49 I guess let's move on to the next topic then 17:29:21 #topic Bugs 17:29:30 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Tempest-bug-report 17:29:47 gmann pulled the numbers for this week there ^^^ 17:30:02 it looks like we contained growth but didn't help with the backlog on bugs 17:30:58 looking at the rotation etherpad I think coolsvap|afk volunteered 17:31:17 but I guess he's not around so he can't provide an update 17:31:41 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-rotation 17:32:03 looks like next week maurosr volunteered 17:32:33 hopefully we'll be able to clear out the new bug backlog and start making better use of the tracker soon 17:32:50 does anyone else have anything else to discuss about bugs? 17:33:06 ugh - this schedule…sorry I'm late 17:33:31 dtroyer: no worries 17:33:55 oh I guess it's lunchtime for you now 17:34:23 #topic Devstack 17:34:33 dtroyer: so anything to discuss about devstack this week? 17:35:28 I want to start preparing for juno/stable, so basically focusing on stuff we want there. From the standpoint of what we want for grenade juno -> master 17:35:52 the one major thing I'm trying to get in yet is rcrit's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98854/ to change how we do SSL 17:36:35 that configures everything for ssl, and sets us up to change the tls-proxy. I'd like to get rid of stud and use apache for that, post stable branch 17:37:30 dtroyer: yeah doing that through apache would definitely be nicer. 17:37:48 so are you looking to land anything else before you start the juno branch cut? 17:38:39 I don't have a specific like prepared, but what is in the queue for migrating services to mod_wsgi 17:38:46 s/like/list/ 17:39:19 ok, I was just looking for things to prioritze reviews in the minutes 17:39:41 dtroyer: is there anything else? 17:40:09 oh, specifically, I'd like to get https://review.openstack.org/111734 in. the rest of the logging cleanup will have to wait now 17:40:35 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111734/ 17:40:51 fwiw, the logging stuff is still in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/devstack-logging, I need to move it to a blueprint and probably actually start using those 17:40:59 fini 17:41:35 dtroyer: oh, yeah I was going to talk to you about bps/specs for devstack in kilo 17:41:49 but we can do that outside of the meeting 17:41:56 dtroyer: thanks for the update 17:42:08 I started cleaning up bugs, many to go yet… 17:42:35 sigh, yeah bugs are a constant process 17:43:08 ok, lets move on to critical reviews 17:43:12 #topic Critical Reviews 17:43:29 ok does anyone have any reviews that they feel could use some extra attention? 17:44:53 I have 2: 17:44:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113674/ 17:45:19 #link https://review.openstack.org/122861 17:45:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/124069/ is the fix from this morning, had a typo in the first revision, so it's back in check 17:45:50 hopefully that will make debugging things easier 17:46:13 sdague: cool 17:46:49 ok, if there aren't any other reviews I'll open the floor 17:46:58 #topic Open Discussion 17:47:13 does anyone have anything else that they'd like to discuss? 17:48:15 mtreinish: didn't you want to talk about the summit brainstorming? 17:48:30 yeah, it's in the agenda 17:48:34 jlanoux: oh yeah, thanks I missed that :) 17:48:46 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-qa-summit-topics 17:48:56 it was more just a reminder that the etherpad is out there 17:49:10 and if anyone wanted to discuss something briefly that's on the list now 17:49:22 mtreinish: ok :) 17:49:48 so brainstorming means do it to the etherpad and we will refine / discuss later? 17:49:49 I'm planning to have a dedicated meeting or 2 closer to summit about that 17:50:06 mlavalle: yep, just jot down anything you think we should discuss at summit on that list 17:50:13 :-) 17:51:19 because we're going to have a day which is like a mini midcycle, so even if a topic doesn't get a dedicated session it might still be good for a smaller conversation then 17:52:18 ok, well if there aren't any other topics to discuss I guess we'll end it early today 17:52:21 thanks everyone 17:52:38 bye! 17:52:41 #endmeeting