22:00:27 <mtreinish> #startmeeting qa
22:00:27 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Oct 30 22:00:27 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mtreinish. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
22:00:28 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
22:00:31 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
22:00:43 <mtreinish> hi who's here today?
22:00:51 <masayukig> o/
22:00:54 <gmann> hi
22:00:58 <dmorita> o/
22:01:01 <mtreinish> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_October_30th_2014_.282200_UTC.29
22:01:06 <mtreinish> ^^^ Today's agenda
22:01:19 <stevebaker> \o
22:01:52 <dstanek> o/
22:02:00 <mtreinish> ok, let's get started
22:02:08 <mtreinish> #topic No meeting next week (mtreinish)
22:02:24 <mtreinish> so obviously there is not going to be a meeting next week because of summit
22:02:35 <mtreinish> but I figured that I'd put it on the agenda anyway
22:02:58 <dmorita> ok
22:03:07 <mtreinish> I'll also be on vacation the week after summit so I was hoping someone would volunteer to run the meeting
22:03:23 <mtreinish> if everyone still wants to have one, we can just skip 2 weeks too
22:04:02 <masayukig> sorry, I can't attend the meeting.
22:04:26 <mtreinish> heh, well I guess we'll just skip 2 weeks then :)
22:04:44 <dmorita> probably, no problem
22:04:53 <mtreinish> #info next meeting to be Nov 20th at 1700utc
22:04:58 <mtreinish> ok let's move on then
22:05:01 <gmann> yes. no issue
22:05:05 <mtreinish> #topic Blueprints
22:05:22 <mtreinish> ok, does anyone have any open blueprints they'd like to discuss
22:05:26 <mtreinish> or give a status update on
22:05:54 <gmann> mtreinish: Testing Nova V2.1 NP-
22:06:06 <gmann> NP-> BP - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96661/
22:06:22 <gmann> I have re updated spec, can you please have look
22:06:45 <mtreinish> gmann: ok I'll take a look, but I want to avoid what we did for v3 which is adding tests for an unstable api
22:06:55 <mtreinish> but it should just be the same tests right?
22:07:19 <gmann> yes, idea is to share same V2 tests for V2.1
22:07:49 <gmann> there might be some difference which we need to take care for V2.1 due to extra response attribute in response
22:08:07 <gmann> and strict input validation
22:08:56 <mtreinish> gmann: hmm, I think we should try to avoid the dual test copy thing we were doing with v3. If we can make the v2 tests pass on both with just a little tweaking that would be best
22:09:10 <mtreinish> because then we could just have an experimental job which just changed the catalog name in config
22:09:25 <mtreinish> but I'll read the spec and comment there
22:09:31 <mtreinish> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96661/
22:09:47 <mtreinish> oh, I guess that still has a -2 from the v3
22:09:54 <gmann> mtreinish: yes, tests case will be same as V2. with some tweak due to diff in V2 & V2.1 API
22:11:22 <mtreinish> ok, does anyone else have a bp to bring up?
22:11:57 <mtreinish> andreaf did ask me to mention the resource-cleanup bp
22:12:10 <mtreinish> he's got his framework patch up here:
22:12:13 <mtreinish> #link https://review.openstack.org/115353
22:12:27 <mtreinish> and he wanted extra opinions on his discussion about it with gmann
22:12:48 <mtreinish> so if everyone could take a look and provide feedback I think that would help with moving this forward
22:13:10 <masayukig> ok, I'll have a look.
22:13:34 <mtreinish> masayukig: thanks
22:13:46 <mtreinish> ok if there aren't any other bps to discuss I guess we can move on
22:14:07 <mtreinish> #topic Devstack
22:14:31 <mtreinish> so dtroyer said he wasn't able to make it today because he's travelling to Paris (or already there)
22:14:47 <mtreinish> so does anyone have anything to discuss about devstack? otherwise we'll move on
22:15:57 <mtreinish> #topic Grenade
22:16:13 <mtreinish> ok same story here, so does anyone have anything to discuss about grenade?
22:16:16 <mtreinish> jogo: ^^^
22:17:38 <mtreinish> #topic Bugs
22:17:50 <mtreinish> gmann: ok, how's the bug backlog look this week?
22:18:11 <gmann> currently  new bugs count is 6 - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Tempest-bug-report
22:18:24 <mtreinish> ooh, single digits that's good
22:18:34 <mtreinish> how many of those 6 were filed this week?
22:19:13 <gmann> i think 1
22:19:21 <gmann> other are previous week one
22:19:36 <mtreinish> oh, ok
22:20:22 <mtreinish> well that's still pretty good, now I guess we just need to work through the open bugs since we seem to have a handle on the new ones
22:20:47 <gmann> we are going good to keeping new bug count down. but i think we need to start looking into open bug too
22:21:16 <gmann> +1
22:21:31 <mtreinish> ok, is there anything else on bugs?
22:21:41 <gmann> nothing from my side
22:22:02 <mtreinish> oh, I guess I can advertise:
22:22:04 <mtreinish> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1386782
22:22:05 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1386782 in tempest "tempest-lib migration script generates incorrect sha1s" [High,Triaged]
22:22:11 <mtreinish> which is something I found the other day
22:22:26 <mtreinish> I don't have time to fix it, but if someone else wanted to work on it shouldn't be too difficult
22:23:20 <mtreinish> ok does anyone else have something to discuss about open bugs for any project?
22:23:27 <mtreinish> *any qa project
22:24:30 <mtreinish> #topic Critical Reviews
22:24:44 <mtreinish> ok, does anyone have an open code review they'd like to get extra eyes on?
22:25:25 <mtreinish> #link https://review.openstack.org/131906
22:25:34 <mtreinish> that should be a pretty simple fix to review
22:26:22 <mtreinish> anyone else?
22:26:42 <gmann> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87191/
22:26:54 <gmann> pending since long time
22:27:41 <mtreinish> yeah, I was just going to say it's been a while since I've seen a review number in the 80000s
22:28:06 <gmann> :)
22:28:40 <mtreinish> ok, if there aren't any other reviews I guess I'll open the floor
22:28:44 <mtreinish> #topic Open Discussion
22:28:55 <mtreinish> there was another agenda topic, but I talked to yfried earlier about it
22:29:18 <mtreinish> and we're going to hold that until after summit, because there will be discussion of that there
22:29:27 <stevebaker> It would be good if some QA folk could come to the heat testing summit session Wed 13:50 http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/eb261fb08b18ec1eaa2c67492e7fc385#.VFK6cXV7jUZ
22:29:56 <mtreinish> stevebaker: sure, I'll try to be there
22:30:09 <stevebaker> we'll cover integration/functional tests first, so you can be released into the wild before the end of the session
22:30:09 <stevebaker> mtreinish: cool, thanks
22:30:32 <mtreinish> oh, on summit
22:30:50 <gmann> mtreinish: i also had discussion with yfried and suggested more discussion as scale down large ops test would be good option
22:30:50 <mtreinish> for those who have sessions can you make sure you put an etherpad up here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Kilo/Etherpads#QA
22:31:10 <gmann> * would not
22:31:33 <dmorita> Ok. I will open today.
22:31:38 <mtreinish> dmorita: ok, thanks
22:32:15 <mtreinish> gmann: yeah, it's really just to test the internals of nova that's why it uses the fake virt driver
22:32:23 <mtreinish> it doesn't really belong in tempest either
22:32:34 <mtreinish> which is why I said we should wait until after summit
22:32:54 <gmann> ya
22:32:58 <dstanek> hey all, i'm lurking today, but wanted to say that i've signed up to the the QA liason for Keystone
22:33:20 <mtreinish> dstanek: oh, ok awesome
22:33:37 <mtreinish> so we'll come looking for you now when there are keystone issues :)
22:33:43 <dstanek> sounds good
22:34:16 <jun_xie_1> Hi,Guys, i would like to take a sec. I am new here in this group and I would work on Tempest-related staff from recently
22:34:19 <dstanek> i have a few QA sessions on my schedule for the summit. are there any that i really should be attending to stay up to date?
22:35:16 <mtreinish> dstanek: probably the tempest scope one and tempest-lib. Also, dmorita's tempest auth session has obvious overlap :)
22:35:47 <mtreinish> jun_xie_1: sure, what did you want to discuss?
22:36:57 <jun_xie_1> oh   i am still trying to get a little familiar with this process and dont have any to discuss , just want to say nice meeting you guys and working with you guys in the future.
22:37:00 <jun_xie_1> thanks
22:37:21 <mtreinish> jun_xie_1: oh, ok. Hi then :)
22:37:28 <jun_xie_1> :)
22:37:35 <mtreinish> ok, does anyone else have anything to discuss?
22:38:06 <dmorita> qa meetup is held at am and pm on friday.
22:38:22 <mtreinish> dmorita: yes, that's right
22:38:23 <dmorita> There is no difference between them?
22:38:38 <mtreinish> dmorita: nope, it's just a reserved room for the whole day
22:38:46 <mtreinish> similar to what we did in Germany
22:39:02 <dmorita> OK. i will join pm.
22:39:15 <dmorita> because swift meetup is held at am
22:39:16 <mtreinish> we'll also be sharing the space with infra, and relmgt (which is basically ttx I think)
22:39:22 <mtreinish> dmorita: ok, sure
22:39:47 <dstanek> mtreinish: can't go to tempest-lib because it's during a keystone session - but i'll be at the other ones - thanks
22:39:48 <dmorita> :)
22:40:32 <mtreinish> ok, if that's everything I guess we'll end early
22:40:37 <mtreinish> thanks everyone
22:40:44 <masayukig> thanks
22:40:45 <mtreinish> see you in paris
22:40:48 <dmorita> see you at paris
22:40:49 <jun_xie_1> thanks and see u
22:40:53 <gmann> thanks all, have a great summit :)
22:41:02 <masayukig> see you there
22:41:02 <mtreinish> #endmeeting