22:00:27 #startmeeting qa 22:00:27 Meeting started Thu Oct 30 22:00:27 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mtreinish. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 22:00:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 22:00:31 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 22:00:43 hi who's here today? 22:00:51 o/ 22:00:54 hi 22:00:58 o/ 22:01:01 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_October_30th_2014_.282200_UTC.29 22:01:06 ^^^ Today's agenda 22:01:19 \o 22:01:52 o/ 22:02:00 ok, let's get started 22:02:08 #topic No meeting next week (mtreinish) 22:02:24 so obviously there is not going to be a meeting next week because of summit 22:02:35 but I figured that I'd put it on the agenda anyway 22:02:58 ok 22:03:07 I'll also be on vacation the week after summit so I was hoping someone would volunteer to run the meeting 22:03:23 if everyone still wants to have one, we can just skip 2 weeks too 22:04:02 sorry, I can't attend the meeting. 22:04:26 heh, well I guess we'll just skip 2 weeks then :) 22:04:44 probably, no problem 22:04:53 #info next meeting to be Nov 20th at 1700utc 22:04:58 ok let's move on then 22:05:01 yes. no issue 22:05:05 #topic Blueprints 22:05:22 ok, does anyone have any open blueprints they'd like to discuss 22:05:26 or give a status update on 22:05:54 mtreinish: Testing Nova V2.1 NP- 22:06:06 NP-> BP - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96661/ 22:06:22 I have re updated spec, can you please have look 22:06:45 gmann: ok I'll take a look, but I want to avoid what we did for v3 which is adding tests for an unstable api 22:06:55 but it should just be the same tests right? 22:07:19 yes, idea is to share same V2 tests for V2.1 22:07:49 there might be some difference which we need to take care for V2.1 due to extra response attribute in response 22:08:07 and strict input validation 22:08:56 gmann: hmm, I think we should try to avoid the dual test copy thing we were doing with v3. If we can make the v2 tests pass on both with just a little tweaking that would be best 22:09:10 because then we could just have an experimental job which just changed the catalog name in config 22:09:25 but I'll read the spec and comment there 22:09:31 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96661/ 22:09:47 oh, I guess that still has a -2 from the v3 22:09:54 mtreinish: yes, tests case will be same as V2. with some tweak due to diff in V2 & V2.1 API 22:11:22 ok, does anyone else have a bp to bring up? 22:11:57 andreaf did ask me to mention the resource-cleanup bp 22:12:10 he's got his framework patch up here: 22:12:13 #link https://review.openstack.org/115353 22:12:27 and he wanted extra opinions on his discussion about it with gmann 22:12:48 so if everyone could take a look and provide feedback I think that would help with moving this forward 22:13:10 ok, I'll have a look. 22:13:34 masayukig: thanks 22:13:46 ok if there aren't any other bps to discuss I guess we can move on 22:14:07 #topic Devstack 22:14:31 so dtroyer said he wasn't able to make it today because he's travelling to Paris (or already there) 22:14:47 so does anyone have anything to discuss about devstack? otherwise we'll move on 22:15:57 #topic Grenade 22:16:13 ok same story here, so does anyone have anything to discuss about grenade? 22:16:16 jogo: ^^^ 22:17:38 #topic Bugs 22:17:50 gmann: ok, how's the bug backlog look this week? 22:18:11 currently new bugs count is 6 - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Tempest-bug-report 22:18:24 ooh, single digits that's good 22:18:34 how many of those 6 were filed this week? 22:19:13 i think 1 22:19:21 other are previous week one 22:19:36 oh, ok 22:20:22 well that's still pretty good, now I guess we just need to work through the open bugs since we seem to have a handle on the new ones 22:20:47 we are going good to keeping new bug count down. but i think we need to start looking into open bug too 22:21:16 +1 22:21:31 ok, is there anything else on bugs? 22:21:41 nothing from my side 22:22:02 oh, I guess I can advertise: 22:22:04 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1386782 22:22:05 Launchpad bug 1386782 in tempest "tempest-lib migration script generates incorrect sha1s" [High,Triaged] 22:22:11 which is something I found the other day 22:22:26 I don't have time to fix it, but if someone else wanted to work on it shouldn't be too difficult 22:23:20 ok does anyone else have something to discuss about open bugs for any project? 22:23:27 *any qa project 22:24:30 #topic Critical Reviews 22:24:44 ok, does anyone have an open code review they'd like to get extra eyes on? 22:25:25 #link https://review.openstack.org/131906 22:25:34 that should be a pretty simple fix to review 22:26:22 anyone else? 22:26:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87191/ 22:26:54 pending since long time 22:27:41 yeah, I was just going to say it's been a while since I've seen a review number in the 80000s 22:28:06 :) 22:28:40 ok, if there aren't any other reviews I guess I'll open the floor 22:28:44 #topic Open Discussion 22:28:55 there was another agenda topic, but I talked to yfried earlier about it 22:29:18 and we're going to hold that until after summit, because there will be discussion of that there 22:29:27 It would be good if some QA folk could come to the heat testing summit session Wed 13:50 http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/eb261fb08b18ec1eaa2c67492e7fc385#.VFK6cXV7jUZ 22:29:56 stevebaker: sure, I'll try to be there 22:30:09 we'll cover integration/functional tests first, so you can be released into the wild before the end of the session 22:30:09 mtreinish: cool, thanks 22:30:32 oh, on summit 22:30:50 mtreinish: i also had discussion with yfried and suggested more discussion as scale down large ops test would be good option 22:30:50 for those who have sessions can you make sure you put an etherpad up here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Kilo/Etherpads#QA 22:31:10 * would not 22:31:33 Ok. I will open today. 22:31:38 dmorita: ok, thanks 22:32:15 gmann: yeah, it's really just to test the internals of nova that's why it uses the fake virt driver 22:32:23 it doesn't really belong in tempest either 22:32:34 which is why I said we should wait until after summit 22:32:54 ya 22:32:58 hey all, i'm lurking today, but wanted to say that i've signed up to the the QA liason for Keystone 22:33:20 dstanek: oh, ok awesome 22:33:37 so we'll come looking for you now when there are keystone issues :) 22:33:43 sounds good 22:34:16 Hi,Guys, i would like to take a sec. I am new here in this group and I would work on Tempest-related staff from recently 22:34:19 i have a few QA sessions on my schedule for the summit. are there any that i really should be attending to stay up to date? 22:35:16 dstanek: probably the tempest scope one and tempest-lib. Also, dmorita's tempest auth session has obvious overlap :) 22:35:47 jun_xie_1: sure, what did you want to discuss? 22:36:57 oh i am still trying to get a little familiar with this process and dont have any to discuss , just want to say nice meeting you guys and working with you guys in the future. 22:37:00 thanks 22:37:21 jun_xie_1: oh, ok. Hi then :) 22:37:28 :) 22:37:35 ok, does anyone else have anything to discuss? 22:38:06 qa meetup is held at am and pm on friday. 22:38:22 dmorita: yes, that's right 22:38:23 There is no difference between them? 22:38:38 dmorita: nope, it's just a reserved room for the whole day 22:38:46 similar to what we did in Germany 22:39:02 OK. i will join pm. 22:39:15 because swift meetup is held at am 22:39:16 we'll also be sharing the space with infra, and relmgt (which is basically ttx I think) 22:39:22 dmorita: ok, sure 22:39:47 mtreinish: can't go to tempest-lib because it's during a keystone session - but i'll be at the other ones - thanks 22:39:48 :) 22:40:32 ok, if that's everything I guess we'll end early 22:40:37 thanks everyone 22:40:44 thanks 22:40:45 see you in paris 22:40:48 see you at paris 22:40:49 thanks and see u 22:40:53 thanks all, have a great summit :) 22:41:02 see you there 22:41:02 #endmeeting