17:00:58 #startmeeting qa 17:00:59 Meeting started Thu Aug 13 17:00:58 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mtreinish. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:01:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:01:02 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:01:11 hi, who's here today? 17:01:18 o/ 17:01:25 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_August_13th_2015_.281700_UTC.29 17:01:31 ^^^ Today's agenda 17:02:45 dkranz, afazekas, mkoderer, sdague: around? 17:03:08 andreaf: it might be a quick meeting :) 17:03:19 hi 17:03:49 well, let's get started 17:03:53 o/ 17:03:58 #topic QA Code Sprint (mtreinish) 17:04:14 I posted this to the ML the other day 17:04:46 but we'll be having the code sprint next month in ft collins 17:04:50 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/CodeSprintLibertyFortCollins 17:05:19 if you'd like to come just put your name on the table at the bottom of the wiki 17:05:51 I figured I should just mention it during the meeting 17:06:10 didn't really have anything else to say which wasn't on the ML or on the wiki :) 17:06:19 does anyone have anything else on this? 17:07:25 ok, then let's move on 17:07:32 #topic Specs Reviews 17:07:32 mtreinish: how many people can we host in the FtC office? 17:07:39 #undo 17:07:39 Removing item from minutes: 17:07:46 mtreinish: oh sorry I was late... 17:08:02 andreaf: the number I asked for was ~20 17:08:08 so I don't think we'll have any space issues 17:08:18 mtreinish: ok, cool 17:08:31 it'll be different then nyc :) 17:08:42 we were definitely at max capacity there 17:09:18 it was cosy :D 17:09:38 ok, anything else on this? 17:10:32 #topic Specs Reviews 17:10:49 ok does anyone have any specs reviews to bring up this week? 17:10:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/qa-specs,n,z 17:11:19 it doesn't look like we've seen too specs activity lately 17:12:11 ok, I guess nothing for this one, let's move on 17:12:18 #topic Tempest 17:12:36 so I put something on the agenda here 17:12:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/211601 17:12:59 that's the patch to start the deprecation for the old credential config options 17:13:22 I've added experimental/periodic test-accounts jobs (although I think they don't actually work as expected yet) 17:14:03 mtreinish: awesome :) 17:14:09 but I think once we confirm that the jobs do what they're supposed to we can start the clock for that 17:14:28 the deprecation, not the non-working 17:14:38 what do people thing, 1 cycle for deprecation is sufficient? 17:14:40 andreaf: hehe 17:15:37 so the test-accounts jobs are non-admin also or do they have admin creds configured? 17:15:51 andreaf: I think I set them up to be admin 17:16:15 I just modeled them after the regular non isolated jobs 17:16:19 which have admin 17:16:44 ok, but they do run in parallel, right? 17:16:55 yes, they should 17:17:10 the thing is I actually think right now all I did was screw up the devstack tempest config logic 17:17:39 #link http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-qa/periodic-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-test-accounts-master/581b408/logs/tempest_conf.txt.gz 17:17:51 because that's not really using test accounts 17:17:52 so we need multiple admin accounts configured in the YAML file 17:18:32 andreaf: the account generator util in tempest should do that 17:19:07 ok, yes - but allow_tenant_isolation should be false probably 17:19:22 heh, yeah and we should be pointing tempest at the accounts.yaml 17:19:30 which is why I said it's not quite working :) 17:20:27 but I think once we get the job sorted we can move forward on the deprecation patch 17:22:11 ok, does anyone have anything else to discuss on tempest? 17:22:46 we also have a new job (non-voting) with validation on 17:22:58 oh, that landed cool 17:23:04 how do the initial results look? 17:23:16 like is it more unstable sshing all the time 17:23:33 e.g. http://logs.openstack.org/82/185082/9/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ssh/43e5b61/ 17:24:07 I think it's looking ok so far 17:24:39 cool 17:24:44 I was wondering if there is any way we can get this job (only) getting its results in subunit2sql DB so we can track it there 17:25:05 I think normally check is not getting into the DB? 17:25:16 andreaf: yeah it's only gate right now 17:25:50 andreaf: but that is doable, I'm just not sure about it from a policy decision 17:26:25 andreaf: push a patch up to add it to: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/logstash/jenkins-log-client.yaml#n14 17:26:32 and we can discuss it in the review 17:27:16 andreaf: but if you just want to track the job failure rate you can do that with graphite 17:27:42 but I agree subunit2sql does give you more detail 17:27:52 ok, I'll try both 17:28:26 ok, is there anything else on tempest? 17:29:29 #topic Devstack 17:29:47 does anyone have something to discuss on devstack this week? 17:30:19 I don’t have any topics but I’d like to request. 17:30:39 I think devstack needs core’s review more. 17:31:01 I hope that devstack cores increase to review a little more. 17:31:27 hichihara: it's just a little slow because several cores are away right now 17:31:38 I'll try to pick up some more slack 17:31:49 a logistical comment: I think we won't have anyone from devstack / grenade every 2nd week in the QA meeting 17:32:00 mtreinish: sounds good 17:32:34 andreaf: there are a couple devstack cores in the europe 17:32:39 but grenade definitely not 17:33:09 but people are still free to dicuss it without cores from the project being awake 17:34:05 is there anything else on devstack? 17:35:07 ok 17:35:50 andreaf: I'll leave it up to everyone else to figure out how to organize the alt timeslot meeting :) 17:36:04 since 4am isn't something likely for me to attend 17:36:12 anyway lets move on 17:36:15 #topic Grenade 17:36:40 does anyone have anything to discuss on grenade for this week? 17:37:17 oh, I guess I had 1 thing 17:37:40 we recently added dansmith to grenade-core 17:37:59 so I should put him on the spot :) 17:38:18 dansmith: anything you want to discuss about grenade? 17:40:21 well I guess not :) 17:40:25 let's move on 17:40:28 #topic Critical Reviews 17:40:51 does anyone have any reviews they'd like to get extra eyes on? 17:41:31 mtreinish: sorry 17:41:43 mtreinish: multiple pings at the same time, thought they were all in -nova 17:41:49 mtreinish: but no, nothing from me :) 17:41:50 dansmith: no worries, I knew you didn't have anything to say anyway :) 17:41:54 oh snap! 17:42:02 but, true 17:42:39 oh, there are 2 reviews on the agenda 17:42:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/207913/ 17:42:50 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209144/ 17:43:28 does anyone else have a review to bring up? 17:45:14 ok I guess not 17:45:29 #topic Open Discussion 17:45:40 does anyone have anything else to discuss this week? 17:47:13 ok I guess there isn't anything else this week 17:47:15 thanks everyone 17:47:21 #endmeeting