09:00:12 #startmeeting qa 09:00:13 Meeting started Thu Apr 7 09:00:12 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:14 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:17 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 09:00:29 hi who's here for today? 09:00:32 \o/ 09:00:40 masayukig: hi 09:00:43 o/ 09:00:55 jlanoux: hi 09:01:05 hi gmann 09:01:06 gmann: jlanoux: hi 09:01:12 hi masayukig 09:01:17 :) 09:01:32 hi guys o/ ;) 09:01:38 dmellado: hi 09:01:42 hi 09:01:52 tosky: hi 09:01:54 hi 09:02:12 let's start 09:02:24 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_April_7th_2016_.280900_UTC.29 09:02:32 ^^ today agenda 09:02:51 #topic Specs Reviews 09:02:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/qa-specs,n,z 09:03:13 hi 09:03:23 jordanP: hi 09:03:35 Still need to look into client refactor spec 09:03:43 did not get time this week 09:03:55 I think andrea updated that 09:04:14 next one we were discussing yesterday was defcore tag one 09:04:16 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301879/ 09:04:49 on discussion i am not in favor of that tag but need to review the spec and add comment there 09:05:24 but more people can review that which will be helpful to set right direction for defcore list of tests 09:05:44 I'll look at it 09:06:01 masayukig: Thanks 09:06:26 next is from oomichi about swagger doc from schema 09:06:29 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297473/ 09:07:01 It is pretty straight forward and LGTM except adding description for each element 09:07:36 this will be helpful to have nice API doc from swagger or other tool 09:08:11 any question or any other spec to discuss? 09:09:01 * gmann very tired today, want to go home early.. :) 09:09:15 ok if nothing much let's move to next topic 09:09:33 #topic Priority Items 09:09:46 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-qa-priorities 09:10:08 in this first one, microversion one is completed 09:10:26 gmann: great 09:10:44 BP is marked as closed and we can start implementing the tests for microversion 09:11:16 - Health Dashboard 09:11:37 masayukig: you want to update on dashboard if any new thing to know 09:12:16 yeah, we are changing some aggressively. 09:13:26 yup :) And we should have a design summit session for the future. 09:13:37 masayukig: cool 09:13:42 (mtreinish already proposed it) 09:14:18 +1, there are lot of feature we can add on that 09:14:32 masayukig: Thanks 09:14:54 next - Service Client Migrations 09:15:13 so we are closed to complete network service client also along with compute 09:15:19 just 2-3 patches more 09:15:44 oomichi: has one for network 09:15:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301294/ 09:16:06 cool 09:16:31 and m mocing last one from compute one - keypair client 09:16:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/302482/2 09:16:48 # startmeeting test 09:16:53 ohhh 09:16:55 so in Mitaka we can have all compute and network one in lib 09:16:58 sorry 09:17:01 wrong channel 09:17:02 dmellado: :) 09:17:39 any other topic on priority item ? 09:17:55 or we can move if masayukig have anything on CLI? 09:18:19 I have nothing about it :) 09:18:24 ok 09:18:35 #topic Tempest 09:19:16 in morning i was discussing with mtreinish about layer 4 tests migration to their repo 09:19:34 so he already moved zaqar and doing for trove 09:20:05 I'm working on it for Sahara 09:20:20 I checked that telemetry one are all in their tree so i need to check with them if they have those running on gate 09:20:28 if so i will remove those from tempest 09:20:39 tosky: yea, mtreinish mentioned that 09:20:45 tosky: very nice, Thanks 09:21:01 it will be nice if we are able to move all 09:21:19 really great (we're kicking out them :-P) 09:21:32 only heat one needs to hold on till they merge the plugin and move tempest one to functional 09:21:39 masayukig: yea 09:22:01 because may times it block the gate if something wrong 09:22:17 as today happened with Nova default flavor removal 09:22:44 let's see how soon we can migrate those 09:23:36 tosky: if you need any help on sahara one please let us know anytime 09:24:26 yeah, we can help each other ;) 09:24:31 anything else on Tempest? 09:24:38 yea we are good team :) 09:25:11 sure, thanks - I already did for python-saharaclient tests, it's more a matter of checking the plugin code :) 09:25:46 tosky: great, Thanks 09:26:29 ok, let's move on :) 09:26:34 ok, les's jumped to Austin Summit 09:26:42 Austin summit topic :) 09:26:50 #topic Austin Summit 09:27:01 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-qa-summit-topics 09:27:39 so we have many sessions proposal there 09:27:52 9 sessions there? 09:28:32 The deadline is next week meeting. 09:28:33 masayukig: yea 09:28:49 yea oomichi might be finalizing those in next week meeting 09:29:18 so then let's wait 'til then to see if there's any new session/votes 09:29:42 only thing we discussed in Nova API meeting is not to conflict QA with API sessions 09:29:49 dmellado: yea 09:30:02 I think "How to acceralate to apply tempest.lib to each project " and "What's necessary for a tempest plugin?" are similar/related things. 09:30:12 so if anyone has some other sessions you can let oomichi know and he can short that out 09:30:31 masayukig: would you like to co-chair that and agree on a common schedule? 09:30:42 masayukig: yea seems to, so those are for better doc only or anything more needed? 09:30:53 maybe we can merge them 09:31:17 dmellado: agree to merge 09:31:35 I'm not sure it's enough time or not, though. 09:31:58 we can drop some topics if needed 09:32:11 and if anyone has interest in going deep we can grab them after the tech talk 09:32:41 but let's discuss this off-meeting masayukig 09:33:00 dmellado: m still not getting plugin one? 09:33:08 what is actually needed 09:33:24 gmann: the point is that I'me seeing that a ton of projects still have doubts/issues with the plugin structure 09:33:39 and would like to cover that as a technical point of view 09:33:45 in-repo, separate repo 09:33:51 configurations, cookiecutter and so on 09:33:58 dmellado: hummm, i think we have doc for those 09:34:04 well, that's more a documentation issue/best practicies 09:34:12 and with recommendation 09:34:16 I know, but still think that it'd be useful 09:34:35 anyways let's find out what all issue there. nice to capture those and fix if any 09:34:40 that said, I think it could be moved to a topic in masayukig and we can co-chair the session 09:34:41 dmellado: sure 09:34:49 dmellado: +1 09:35:34 so let's add more ideas before next week meeting 09:35:37 dmellado: ah, I'm not a proposer "How to acceralate to apply tempest.lib to each project", though :) 09:35:45 oh, 09:35:47 * dmellado checking 09:36:07 oh, it was oomichi 09:36:08 masayukig: you can be default one :) 09:36:08 maybe, oomichi is the one 09:36:19 masayukig: yes, I'll talk with him about this 09:36:26 dmellado: cool 09:36:32 dmellado: ok ;) 09:36:43 ;) 09:36:58 anything else ? 09:37:27 #topic Critical Reviews 09:37:46 any reviews from anyone needs to bring up here 09:38:39 ok, i will add mine if nothing else 09:38:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/302482/2 09:39:08 we can complete compute service client after this 09:39:44 #Open Discussion 09:39:56 anything more to discuss or we close early 09:41:03 ok, if nothing else, we can close. 09:41:08 5..... 09:41:12 4.... 09:41:16 3... 09:41:19 2.. 09:41:21 1. 09:41:27 Thanks everyone :) 09:41:28 Thanks all for joining 09:41:39 #endmeeting