17:00:32 <andreaf> #startmeeting qa
17:00:33 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug 31 17:00:32 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is andreaf. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:35 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
17:00:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
17:01:28 <andreaf> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_August_31st_2017_.281700_UTC.29 - Today's agenda
17:01:35 <andreaf> o/
17:01:42 <andreaf> who's here for the meeting today?
17:02:02 <chandankumar> \o/
17:02:27 <felipemonteiro> o/
17:02:38 <andreaf> hello folks
17:02:54 <andreaf> let's see if someone else joins today
17:04:04 <andreaf> ok let's start
17:04:09 <andreaf> #topic PTG
17:04:30 <andreaf> #link session planning  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-queens-ptg
17:04:54 <andreaf> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-pike-retrospective retrospective
17:05:15 <trevormc> o/
17:05:27 <andreaf> I setup an etherpad for a pike retrospective
17:05:53 <andreaf> input in there is welcome - I will consolidate it before the PTG
17:06:23 <andreaf> #link https://doodle.com/poll/84mwxxbrtsmsaw4x
17:07:02 <andreaf> I also setup a doodle for an evening event at the PTG
17:07:19 <andreaf> if you are interested please vote your preferred date
17:07:29 <chandankumar> andreaf: i have one query which day is tempest plugin split walkthrough?
17:07:43 <andreaf> and if you know Denver and have ideas for a place add it to the etherpad
17:09:10 <felipemonteiro> thanks, just added myself to doodle
17:09:18 <andreaf> chandankumar: I'm not sure yet I guess we can go through as many time as needed for people when they ask
17:10:06 <andreaf> chandankumar: we can advertise in the PTG rooms a few minutes before it happens
17:10:31 <andreaf> trevormc: o/ - will you be at the PTG?
17:10:40 <chandankumar> andreaf: that will help, thanks :-)
17:10:53 <trevormc> andreaf, yes I will
17:11:14 <trevormc> but only for w-f
17:11:43 <andreaf> trevormc: nice - if there is something that you would like to work with the QA team feel free to add it to the etherpad
17:12:09 <trevormc> andreaf, will do, thanks
17:14:34 <andreaf> about sessions, if you plan to discuss a topic, please setup a dedicated etherpad for it and link it to the main etherpad
17:15:26 <andreaf> anything else to discuss for the PTG?
17:16:06 <chandankumar> andreaf: just an update on tempest plugin split, I talked with manila team for tempest plugin split
17:16:36 <chandankumar> raissa: will be helping on manila side
17:16:58 <andreaf> chandankumar: good - raissa thanks for your help
17:17:08 <raissa> glad to help
17:19:14 <andreaf> ok next topic
17:19:22 <andreaf> #topic Gate stability
17:20:19 <andreaf> The categorization rate for the integrated gate is rather bad still - 28%
17:21:32 <andreaf> And the utilisation of nodes is still pretty high
17:22:21 <felipemonteiro__> do you mind sharing the link?
17:22:47 <andreaf> #link http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html#gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial
17:23:47 <andreaf> #link http://status.openstack.org/zuul/ - the amount of nodes used is a graph on the bottom
17:24:32 <andreaf> #link https://goo.gl/ptPgEw - failures in the gate integration
17:24:47 <felipemonteiro__> thanks
17:25:29 <andreaf> ok moving on
17:25:33 <andreaf> #topic Tempest
17:26:03 <andreaf> There's one topic there "Addition of scenario tests in Tempest" but I don't know who added that?
17:27:10 <lwanderley> I think it was rodrigods or raildo
17:27:30 <lwanderley> But I guess I speak for it
17:28:04 <andreaf> lwanderley: sure go ahead
17:28:28 <lwanderley> andreaf thanks
17:29:09 <lwanderley> we added a need ci job in a multiple domain keystone scenario
17:29:24 <lwanderley> and we need reviews
17:29:31 <lwanderley> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490735/
17:30:41 <lwanderley> the test failed on this specific case
17:31:22 <andreaf> lwanderley: ok sure I'll look at it
17:31:35 <lwanderley> andreaf great, thanks!
17:32:23 <andreaf> lwanderley: so it's CI job running on all keystone changes?
17:32:52 <lwanderley> it's still under review but that's the plan
17:33:05 <lwanderley> non-voting of course
17:34:00 <andreaf> lwanderley: I see ok - it would be good to see that job running with the Tempest change perhaps we can see that before merging the change
17:34:36 <andreaf> lwanderley: does domain_specific_drivers mean that the users backend is different in different domains?
17:34:38 <chandankumar> andreaf: what about a depends-on job with this change on keystone side to test it
17:35:05 <andreaf> chandankumar: yeah that's what I was thinking - but first the job needs to merges on keystone side
17:36:40 <andreaf> anything else on Tempest?
17:36:44 <lwanderley> andreaf yes
17:37:21 <lwanderley> we proposed this change to deal with an additional LDAP users backend
17:39:07 <andreaf> lwanderley: ok
17:39:53 <andreaf> lwanderley: well if this does not get sorted before it's something we can follow-up on at the PTG
17:40:18 <rodrigods> i think raildo will be there ^
17:40:43 <andreaf> rodrigods: cool
17:40:46 <rodrigods> thanks andreaf - would be really nice to have these latest patches merged
17:41:18 <raildo> andreaf, yeah, I'll be there in the PTG, so I would love to help on it
17:41:22 <andreaf> there's still space to add proposed sessions in the QA etherpad - and add your name in there
17:42:34 <andreaf> ok anything else on PTG or Tempest?
17:42:38 <trevormc> i just had one thing for tempest at the moment.
17:42:40 <trevormc> its not critical but im looking forward to the load-list command being merged soon, is there any more opinions on this review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487444/
17:43:21 <andreaf> trevormc: heh I meant to look at it but didn't manage yet
17:43:31 <trevormc> nice, thanks
17:43:39 <trevormc> i left a comment regarding ids
17:44:40 <andreaf> trevormc: what's the use case for that?
17:45:42 <andreaf> trevormc: if you have a list of test names add ^ $ at the beginning and end of each line and replace . with \. and you have a list of regex :)
17:46:25 <trevormc> andreaf: ok ill try that out, I haven't actually done a permutation on all the regex combinations
17:46:44 <trevormc> this was something that was left in the middle I was asked to look at. I'll follow up on the use case.
17:47:28 <andreaf> trevormc: I was just trying to understand why we need the load-tests argument having the whitelist
17:48:01 <trevormc> andreaf, yeah they sound the same to me
17:48:26 <trevormc> ill see what the difference is, if any.
17:49:06 <trevormc> ok we have about 800 tests and adding a ^ $ around them all would be a pain
17:49:08 <trevormc> is what im hearing
17:49:09 <andreaf> trevormc: ok cool thanks
17:50:12 <andreaf> trevormc: ok well I guess it let's you skip using one sed command in your pipeline
17:50:31 <andreaf> anyways I'm not opposed to it as long as it works fine :)
17:50:40 <trevormc> cool, thanks!
17:50:52 <andreaf> ok time's running out - 10 minutes left
17:51:05 <andreaf> moving to next topics
17:51:10 <andreaf> #topic Patrole
17:51:39 <felipemonteiro> we'd like to release a v0.2.0 release since a lot has changed since v0.1.0
17:51:55 <andreaf> congratulation for the release
17:52:03 <chandankumar> felipemonteiro: great
17:52:23 <chandankumar> felipemonteiro: in RDO, we have tagged patrole-0.1.0 for pike release
17:52:23 <felipemonteiro> andreaf so you're ok with it, i'll add you as reviewer?
17:52:34 <andreaf> felipemonteiro: is someone using patrole from pip already?
17:52:45 <chandankumar> i will update the package to 0.2.0 once released
17:52:59 <andreaf> felipemonteiro: sure
17:53:08 <felipemonteiro> andreaf: not that i know of, but it's possible, redhat started contributing recently
17:53:18 <andreaf> felipemonteiro: ok
17:53:19 <felipemonteiro> so anything is possible
17:53:49 <felipemonteiro> that's it from me on patrole
17:53:54 <andreaf> ok
17:53:58 <andreaf> #topic Critical Reviews
17:54:18 <felipemonteiro> this unblocks broken qa-specs gate:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498665/
17:54:26 <andreaf> Any review that require urgent attention?
17:54:38 <chandankumar> andreaf: felipemonteiro need your help on aodh tempest plugin repo https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498796/
17:55:09 <andreaf> felipemonteiro: thanks - why didn't we get that from the bot I wonder?
17:55:10 <chandankumar> aodh have a mixture of gabbi and tempest tests
17:55:34 <chandankumar> i think same type of queries might come when we seperate heat tempest plugin to seperate repo
17:56:14 <felipemonteiro> andreaf: dunno, mayasuki has a good patch to to make qa-specs warnings errors
17:56:35 <felipemonteiro> chandankumar: will look at it
17:56:42 <andreaf> chandankumar: sure I will check
17:57:04 <andreaf> chandankumar: I know not everyone agrees to the goal anyways so we cannot force teams to implement it
17:57:04 <chandankumar> felipemonteiro: andreaf thanks :-)
17:57:20 <andreaf> chandankumar: but I can comment on that review for sure
17:57:30 <chandankumar> andreaf: yes same situation turned up for manila also
17:57:47 <andreaf> chandankumar: yeah I saw the chat during the manila meeting
17:58:19 <andreaf> ok two minutes left - anything else?
17:58:26 <andreaf> 3..
17:58:28 <andreaf> 2..
17:58:30 <andreaf> 1..
17:58:37 <andreaf> thanks everyone
17:58:40 <andreaf> #endmeeting