17:00:32 #startmeeting qa 17:00:33 Meeting started Thu Aug 31 17:00:32 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is andreaf. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:37 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 17:01:28 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_August_31st_2017_.281700_UTC.29 - Today's agenda 17:01:35 o/ 17:01:42 who's here for the meeting today? 17:02:02 \o/ 17:02:27 o/ 17:02:38 hello folks 17:02:54 let's see if someone else joins today 17:04:04 ok let's start 17:04:09 #topic PTG 17:04:30 #link session planning https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-queens-ptg 17:04:54 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-pike-retrospective retrospective 17:05:15 o/ 17:05:27 I setup an etherpad for a pike retrospective 17:05:53 input in there is welcome - I will consolidate it before the PTG 17:06:23 #link https://doodle.com/poll/84mwxxbrtsmsaw4x 17:07:02 I also setup a doodle for an evening event at the PTG 17:07:19 if you are interested please vote your preferred date 17:07:29 andreaf: i have one query which day is tempest plugin split walkthrough? 17:07:43 and if you know Denver and have ideas for a place add it to the etherpad 17:09:10 thanks, just added myself to doodle 17:09:18 chandankumar: I'm not sure yet I guess we can go through as many time as needed for people when they ask 17:10:06 chandankumar: we can advertise in the PTG rooms a few minutes before it happens 17:10:31 trevormc: o/ - will you be at the PTG? 17:10:40 andreaf: that will help, thanks :-) 17:10:53 andreaf, yes I will 17:11:14 but only for w-f 17:11:43 trevormc: nice - if there is something that you would like to work with the QA team feel free to add it to the etherpad 17:12:09 andreaf, will do, thanks 17:14:34 about sessions, if you plan to discuss a topic, please setup a dedicated etherpad for it and link it to the main etherpad 17:15:26 anything else to discuss for the PTG? 17:16:06 andreaf: just an update on tempest plugin split, I talked with manila team for tempest plugin split 17:16:36 raissa: will be helping on manila side 17:16:58 chandankumar: good - raissa thanks for your help 17:17:08 glad to help 17:19:14 ok next topic 17:19:22 #topic Gate stability 17:20:19 The categorization rate for the integrated gate is rather bad still - 28% 17:21:32 And the utilisation of nodes is still pretty high 17:22:21 do you mind sharing the link? 17:22:47 #link http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html#gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial 17:23:47 #link http://status.openstack.org/zuul/ - the amount of nodes used is a graph on the bottom 17:24:32 #link https://goo.gl/ptPgEw - failures in the gate integration 17:24:47 thanks 17:25:29 ok moving on 17:25:33 #topic Tempest 17:26:03 There's one topic there "Addition of scenario tests in Tempest" but I don't know who added that? 17:27:10 I think it was rodrigods or raildo 17:27:30 But I guess I speak for it 17:28:04 lwanderley: sure go ahead 17:28:28 andreaf thanks 17:29:09 we added a need ci job in a multiple domain keystone scenario 17:29:24 and we need reviews 17:29:31 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490735/ 17:30:41 the test failed on this specific case 17:31:22 lwanderley: ok sure I'll look at it 17:31:35 andreaf great, thanks! 17:32:23 lwanderley: so it's CI job running on all keystone changes? 17:32:52 it's still under review but that's the plan 17:33:05 non-voting of course 17:34:00 lwanderley: I see ok - it would be good to see that job running with the Tempest change perhaps we can see that before merging the change 17:34:36 lwanderley: does domain_specific_drivers mean that the users backend is different in different domains? 17:34:38 andreaf: what about a depends-on job with this change on keystone side to test it 17:35:05 chandankumar: yeah that's what I was thinking - but first the job needs to merges on keystone side 17:36:40 anything else on Tempest? 17:36:44 andreaf yes 17:37:21 we proposed this change to deal with an additional LDAP users backend 17:39:07 lwanderley: ok 17:39:53 lwanderley: well if this does not get sorted before it's something we can follow-up on at the PTG 17:40:18 i think raildo will be there ^ 17:40:43 rodrigods: cool 17:40:46 thanks andreaf - would be really nice to have these latest patches merged 17:41:18 andreaf, yeah, I'll be there in the PTG, so I would love to help on it 17:41:22 there's still space to add proposed sessions in the QA etherpad - and add your name in there 17:42:34 ok anything else on PTG or Tempest? 17:42:38 i just had one thing for tempest at the moment. 17:42:40 its not critical but im looking forward to the load-list command being merged soon, is there any more opinions on this review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487444/ 17:43:21 trevormc: heh I meant to look at it but didn't manage yet 17:43:31 nice, thanks 17:43:39 i left a comment regarding ids 17:44:40 trevormc: what's the use case for that? 17:45:42 trevormc: if you have a list of test names add ^ $ at the beginning and end of each line and replace . with \. and you have a list of regex :) 17:46:25 andreaf: ok ill try that out, I haven't actually done a permutation on all the regex combinations 17:46:44 this was something that was left in the middle I was asked to look at. I'll follow up on the use case. 17:47:28 trevormc: I was just trying to understand why we need the load-tests argument having the whitelist 17:48:01 andreaf, yeah they sound the same to me 17:48:26 ill see what the difference is, if any. 17:49:06 ok we have about 800 tests and adding a ^ $ around them all would be a pain 17:49:08 is what im hearing 17:49:09 trevormc: ok cool thanks 17:50:12 trevormc: ok well I guess it let's you skip using one sed command in your pipeline 17:50:31 anyways I'm not opposed to it as long as it works fine :) 17:50:40 cool, thanks! 17:50:52 ok time's running out - 10 minutes left 17:51:05 moving to next topics 17:51:10 #topic Patrole 17:51:39 we'd like to release a v0.2.0 release since a lot has changed since v0.1.0 17:51:55 congratulation for the release 17:52:03 felipemonteiro: great 17:52:23 felipemonteiro: in RDO, we have tagged patrole-0.1.0 for pike release 17:52:23 andreaf so you're ok with it, i'll add you as reviewer? 17:52:34 felipemonteiro: is someone using patrole from pip already? 17:52:45 i will update the package to 0.2.0 once released 17:52:59 felipemonteiro: sure 17:53:08 andreaf: not that i know of, but it's possible, redhat started contributing recently 17:53:18 felipemonteiro: ok 17:53:19 so anything is possible 17:53:49 that's it from me on patrole 17:53:54 ok 17:53:58 #topic Critical Reviews 17:54:18 this unblocks broken qa-specs gate:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498665/ 17:54:26 Any review that require urgent attention? 17:54:38 andreaf: felipemonteiro need your help on aodh tempest plugin repo https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498796/ 17:55:09 felipemonteiro: thanks - why didn't we get that from the bot I wonder? 17:55:10 aodh have a mixture of gabbi and tempest tests 17:55:34 i think same type of queries might come when we seperate heat tempest plugin to seperate repo 17:56:14 andreaf: dunno, mayasuki has a good patch to to make qa-specs warnings errors 17:56:35 chandankumar: will look at it 17:56:42 chandankumar: sure I will check 17:57:04 chandankumar: I know not everyone agrees to the goal anyways so we cannot force teams to implement it 17:57:04 felipemonteiro: andreaf thanks :-) 17:57:20 chandankumar: but I can comment on that review for sure 17:57:30 andreaf: yes same situation turned up for manila also 17:57:47 chandankumar: yeah I saw the chat during the manila meeting 17:58:19 ok two minutes left - anything else? 17:58:26 3.. 17:58:28 2.. 17:58:30 1.. 17:58:37 thanks everyone 17:58:40 #endmeeting