13:01:39 #startmeeting qa 13:01:40 Meeting started Tue Jul 14 13:01:39 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:01:44 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 13:01:53 Hi, who all are here today? 13:02:01 hello 13:02:05 hi 13:02:08 o/ 13:02:20 soniya29: paras333 gmann hi :) 13:03:03 hi 13:03:17 kopecmartin: hi o/ 13:03:24 OK, let's start 13:03:35 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting 13:03:43 ^^^^^^ today's agenda 13:04:01 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 13:04:29 I have no announcement this time 13:04:40 let's skip 13:04:51 #topic Victoria Priority Items progress 13:04:58 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-victoria-priority 13:05:49 no updates from my side regarding the priority items 13:06:04 kopecmartin: thanks, np. 13:06:35 pin constraint in tox #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739609/ 13:07:22 gmann: cool, thanks 13:07:39 I have started working on sceanario manager and have picked create_volume() method for start 13:08:31 I have updated the etherpad - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager regarding it 13:08:35 gmann: I added me to the patch. 13:08:36 that is pending for review, afazekas has suggestion of making it branch but i feel branchless still give us benefit 13:08:45 thanks 13:08:55 soniya29: cool! 13:09:03 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager 13:09:28 other than tox constraint i think we are good to handle the compatibility 13:09:57 I didn't have time to review patches these days but I will. 13:10:25 so that whatever (tox.ini, requirements.txt etc) is checkout with any tempest tag should be workable as it is. 13:12:09 that is all from me, i replied in review too 13:12:53 gmann: that sounds great. 13:13:27 I'll check it, I didn't have time to review patches these days, though... 13:13:47 OK, anything else? 13:13:54 np!, thanks. 13:14:12 for system scope testing 13:14:51 i have marked the review as important changes and those are ready for review, i have done first round of review and added devstack and testing patches 13:15:21 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:admin-auth-system-scope+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:15:38 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:system_scope_testing+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:16:24 Review Priority label needs to be re-added as those were updated. i will do in my re-review 13:17:02 ++ thanks for rasing up and the links 13:17:05 this is one of the pending work and priority things we should finish as projects started adding the scope_type in their policies 13:18:06 yeah, from ussuri 13:20:57 ok, if nothing else, let's move on 13:21:06 yeah 13:21:21 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 13:21:43 I don't have any events updates yet. 13:22:30 let's skip 13:22:32 #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 13:22:49 Do you have any updates/highlights on the sub-projects such as Tempest, Patrole and Hacking? 13:22:58 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 13:23:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 13:23:14 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 13:23:48 I have not looked at the Patrole gate if any issue? 13:24:54 me neither 13:25:03 but we can move, i do not have much details to share 13:25:24 from devstack side there is one 13:25:45 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740322/ 13:26:10 running glance as standalone when other services are on uwsgi 13:26:22 this is in-progress. 13:26:47 that is all 13:27:21 That sounds interesting, I'll check 13:27:56 this is long pending/stuck things for years 13:28:10 oh, years.. 13:28:36 yeah its uwsgi tings 13:28:37 things 13:29:54 ah, I see. I don't know much detail, though 13:30:13 if anything else, let's move on 13:30:23 yeah 13:30:35 #topic Community goal tracking 13:30:52 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-community-wide-goals-tracking 13:31:04 about that, I sent this for review: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739829/ 13:31:39 a similar change should go into tempest, I wasn't sure whether to remove legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-multinode-full for all jobs or just from ussuri, but I think it could be cleaned everywhere 13:32:06 unless I'm mistaken, those are the only remaining legacy jobs used in QA repositories 13:32:57 I will check, i think we do have dvr multindoe job but need to check 13:33:28 http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr-multinode-full&i=nope&files=&repos= in Nova, too? 13:33:41 for focal migration. i have added testing or migration patches for all repo #link neutron-grenade-dvr-multinode 13:33:49 masayukig: yes https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740447/ 13:33:54 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:34:04 masayukig: I just mentioned what concerns the QA side 13:34:04 tosky: cool :0 13:34:06 :) 13:34:09 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740447/ 13:34:32 hacking patch needs re-review and need release - #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739334/ 13:35:35 Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: Make Glance standalone-ness a separate flag https://review.opendev.org/740322 13:36:36 I'll check. I think I'll be able to have time to review tomorrow and this weekend, hopefully. 13:37:36 other than that there are many deps lower constraints issue which need fixfr focal migration, i am picking those repo by repo 13:38:25 gmann: thank you so much! 13:39:26 Just that same hacking stuff from my end that need you guys to review #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/hacking 13:40:44 paras333: thank you for raising up 13:41:06 yes, definitely 13:41:55 let's move on to next topic unless anything else 13:42:07 #topic Bug Triage 13:42:18 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria 13:43:38 There are many patches to review. 13:44:41 any particular patches and/or bugs we'd like to discuss? 13:45:19 Hi:), I am sorry I did not mentioned it earlier. I created patch for the auto generation of documentation for tests in tempest. Can someone please take a look? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/ 13:46:03 ok, that's the next topic :) 13:46:04 #topic Critical Reviews 13:46:12 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/ 13:46:37 masayukig: Ok:) 13:46:57 lpiwowar: if it's ready can you remove WIP from the commit message? that would be great 13:47:15 paras333: +1 :) 13:47:18 paras333: Ok:) 13:47:42 lpiwowar: thanks 13:47:49 lpiwowar: and add more commit message would be good 13:48:32 masayukig: Ok, I'll correct the commit message. 13:48:42 is this on top of zhufl patches where she is adding the test documentation? 13:48:43 lpiwowar: ++ thanks! 13:49:47 gmann: I do not know about the patch from zhufl. 13:50:02 gmann: I think so. But I think they can be separated? 13:50:18 I mean there's no dependency between them 13:50:32 but do we have tests with descriptions? 13:50:48 zhufl patch #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/testcase-description+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:51:09 to check the generated doc from 735619/ 13:51:38 few of them are merged so we can check those at least. 13:52:08 gmann: yes, agreed 13:55:58 we can move to next. i will review the patch with generated doc 13:56:35 gmann: Thanks!:) 13:57:53 #topic Open Discussion 13:58:03 anything else to discuss? 13:58:27 we have only 1.5mins, though :p 13:59:00 nothing else form me 13:59:04 nops 13:59:15 Thanks, ok, let's close the office hour. 13:59:22 Thank you all!!! 13:59:25 thanks 13:59:32 #endmeeting