13:00:32 #startmeeting qa 13:00:33 Meeting started Tue Jul 28 13:00:32 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:34 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 13:00:44 Hi, who all are here today? 13:00:52 hello o/ 13:00:52 hey masayukig :) 13:00:55 o/ 13:01:06 Hi:) 13:01:39 kopecmartin: paras333 gmann lpiwowar hi \o/ 13:01:46 Merged openstack/tempest master: Stop to use the __future__ module. https://review.opendev.org/732960 13:02:11 OK, let's start 13:02:22 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting 13:02:33 ^^^^^ This is the agenda for today 13:02:44 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 13:02:58 Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/tempest master: Add glance image import web-download tests https://review.opendev.org/742295 13:03:50 The summit is going virtual https://www.openstack.org/summit/2020/ . We don't need to worry about the travel this time :) 13:04:04 hey 13:04:05 I think there's no action item this time 13:04:10 svyas: hi 13:04:21 #topic Victoria Priority Items progress 13:04:36 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-victoria-priority 13:04:58 I fixed the patch to generate documentation for tests: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/ 13:05:51 lpiwowar++ cool. That sounds great. I'll check it 13:06:01 reviewed most of the 'Description for testcases as docstrings' which are up from zhufl 13:06:13 she updated i think, i will re-review. 13:06:15 masayukig: Thanks!:) 13:06:26 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735619/ 13:07:01 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/tempest+branch:master+topic:bp/testcase-description 13:07:11 gmann: thanks! 13:07:24 few updates from ussuri backlogs 13:07:28 RBAC testing strategy 13:08:21 i did the first review on system scope patches #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:admin-auth-system-scope+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:08:52 and testing those with devstack and tempest support #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:system_scope_testing+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:09:19 gmann: Thanks, cool. 13:09:31 but somehow devstack still fail on scope checks while creating the nova flavor. it need system scope token but somehow fail 13:09:44 I'll check them, too. 13:09:46 oh.. 13:10:33 I added system scope 'all' in devstack where it generate the token for nova flavor. I have not debugged it thoroughly though 13:10:52 other is Adding New glance tests to tempest 13:11:18 import tests with glance-direct is merged, and web-download is opending 13:11:20 pending 13:11:22 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742295/ 13:12:00 it passed in previous version, i updated it with trivial change. but this is ready to merge 13:12:48 gmann: great. I've copied & pasted the links to the etherpad 13:13:17 thanks 13:13:30 these are updates from my side 13:13:40 thanks. 13:13:47 any other updates? 13:14:18 i think few of the scenario manager patches are ready to review ? 13:14:26 but we have not reviewed them 13:14:36 with scenario_manager, i find create_volume(), create_keypair() are stable across tempest plugins 13:15:10 and they are stable with respect to name, method implementation 13:15:21 svyas: that's good news, thanks 13:15:26 svyas: ok you mean used as it is what we have in tempest? 13:15:37 gmann, exactly 13:15:38 no modified version 13:15:40 svyas: cool 13:16:05 svyas: can you add doc string for those if not and then mark complete in etherpad 13:16:20 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager 13:16:38 gmann, sure. 13:16:50 svyas: kopecmartin also we are using this BP in all scenario manager patches right ? #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/tempest-scenario-manager-stable 13:17:01 so that i can bookmark those and review in single set 13:17:07 gmann: yes 13:17:10 gmann, yeah 13:17:11 ok, thakns 13:17:14 thanks 13:17:52 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:tempest-scenario-manager-stable+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:18:05 so there is no open review for this right? 13:18:58 still work is in progress 13:19:08 ok, feel free to ping if anything ready. 13:19:08 so, not fully ready for review 13:19:25 gmann: you have one '+' more than needed 13:19:28 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/tempest-scenario-manager-stable(status:open+OR+status:merged) 13:19:42 gmann, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724631/ 13:19:50 kopecmartin: thanks 13:19:53 svyas: ack 13:20:18 we need to get those merged soon along with test doc patches which will be easy to do. those did not get review attention i think 13:21:20 cool, thanks. I've added the link to the etherpads, too. 13:22:31 any other updates? maybe, how about Hacking and/or Bug triage? 13:22:52 bug triage we can cover in bug section 13:23:01 gmann: ah, ok 13:23:02 we did with lpiwowar some bug triaging, the numbers here #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria 13:23:32 kopecmartin: thanks, let's revisit it later 13:23:44 If nothing else, let's move on 13:23:47 lpiwowar fixed the check_uuid script #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701352/ and improved its unit test coverage #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740723/ 13:23:53 both ready for reviews 13:24:15 kopecmartin: lpiwowar cool 13:24:25 kopecmartin: moved the test case desc and volume schema links from bug etherpad to priority etherpad 13:24:39 kopecmartin: masayukig thanks 13:25:03 thanks lpiwowar , i will check those after meeting. thanks for working on that 13:25:48 gmann: ok, thank you! 13:27:12 ok, let's move on 13:27:15 btw test_reboot_server_hard doesn't work on arm64, see #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1888224 we should probably skip the test on that architecture #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724239/ 13:27:16 Launchpad bug 1888224 in tempest "test_reboot_server_hard sometimes has kernel panic in Arm64" [Undecided,New] 13:27:32 that's all i have regarding bugs :) 13:28:23 kopecmartin: oops, thanks for heads up 13:28:23 kopecmartin: hard reboot is hard to verify by API. 13:28:47 tempest cannot verify if it is hard or soft reboot. 13:29:07 this test was always in question to have in tempest 13:29:33 but it should pass with soft reboot if hard reboot not possoble/not-done 13:30:40 gmann: yeah, but I think we should pass with no error at least 13:30:52 yeah 13:31:15 ok, next topic 13:31:16 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 13:31:39 But I already mentioned about the next summit, though. 13:31:50 nothing else from my side 13:32:01 #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 13:32:18 Do you have any updates/highlights on the sub-projects such as Tempest, Patrole and Hacking? 13:32:28 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 13:32:37 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 13:32:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 13:32:45 Tempest 13:33:26 we already discussed on glance testing things and system scope testing which we should get in before m-2 so that projects have the tests running on their gate 13:33:34 gate is up for tempest 13:33:44 devstack 13:34:25 glance standalone things are stable now and dansmith working on fixing uwsgi on glance side and devstack to bring nack with uwsgi by default 13:34:40 gate is up for devstack too 13:34:44 patrole 13:34:47 gate is broken 13:35:05 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743064/ 13:36:02 jobs failing on 'import mock' in tempest/tests/base.py which was removed from tempest recently, i am not sure why patrole jobs not picking the master tempest where there is no 'import mock' 13:36:50 if anyone can debug that, it will be good i will not be able to check that by late this week or next week 13:37:07 hacking 13:38:04 three new patches are up for review 13:38:08 hacking 3.2.0 is released which has the working copy on Ubuntu Focal with moving flake8 to 3.8.0. 13:38:39 paras333: thanks, we can release the new version with your checks-moving things 13:38:55 gmann: paras333 thank you so much 13:39:01 may be with major version up as that can break many projects when they ugrade to new hacking 13:39:23 that's all from me on subteam status 13:41:31 masayukig: we can move next 13:41:37 ok 13:41:47 #topic Community goal tracking 13:41:59 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-community-wide-goals-tracking 13:42:20 i have done the audit for all QA repo for zuulv3 goal and we are all good 13:42:29 i have marked it complete 13:42:51 for 2nd goal: 13:43:06 i have proposed the testing patches for all the QA repos. 13:43:23 few are fixed, few are failing which need debugging and fix accordingly 13:43:53 gmann: thanks for the patches, I'd like to check them 13:43:58 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740375/2 13:44:08 this is ready to review ^^ 13:44:16 * tosky confirms QA is clean from legacy Zuul jobs 13:44:57 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740372/3 13:45:00 this is also ready ^^ 13:45:38 I will add Ready-to-review section in etherpad so that those can be reviewed on priority 13:46:13 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740372/ is this already approved? 13:46:29 ah yeah, it is merged too 13:46:46 ok, cool 13:47:01 gmann: can you have a quick look on this one #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737634/ as this is the one you have tested yourself as well. 13:47:18 paras333: ohk, sure 13:47:25 that's all on goal side 13:47:28 gmann: thank you! 13:47:29 thanks 13:47:32 #topic Bug Triage 13:47:40 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria 13:48:30 i don't have anything else apart from what i've mentioned already 13:48:30 kopecmartin: any other updates? 13:48:40 kopecmartin: ok, thanks 13:48:49 #topic Critical Reviews 13:49:02 Any patches you'd like to discuss? 13:50:33 not from my side, just what was already mentioned 13:50:42 ok, thanks. 13:50:45 yeah what we already discussed. 13:50:56 #topic Open Discussion 13:51:36 anything else you'd like to discuss? 13:52:02 nothing from my side 13:52:32 Ok, if nothing, let's close the office hour. 13:52:48 thank you all! 13:52:49 #endmeeting