13:00:31 <masayukig> #startmeeting qa
13:00:32 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 15 13:00:31 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:00:33 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:00:35 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
13:00:41 <masayukig> hi, who all here today?
13:00:46 <paras333> hey
13:01:51 <masayukig> let's wait for a couple of minutes so that people can join the office hour.
13:03:05 <gmann> o/
13:03:10 <paras333> masayukig: sure
13:03:41 <masayukig> paras333: gmann hi
13:03:51 <bigdogstl> hello
13:04:07 <masayukig> bigdogstl: hello
13:04:45 <masayukig> ok, let's start.
13:04:54 <masayukig> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
13:05:03 <masayukig> ^^^^^ Today's agenda
13:05:12 <masayukig> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
13:05:46 <masayukig> I have nothing to announce atm, so, let's skip
13:06:24 <gmann> masayukig:  we have to do release for QA repos and sync up with release team for the steps wise work
13:07:04 <gmann> also tempest need tox.ini cap as per https://docs.openstack.org/tempest/latest/requirement_upper_constraint_for_tempest.html
13:07:18 <tosky> I've got lost a bit: after the discussion, is the focal migration for integration tests going to happen now or in W?
13:07:20 <masayukig> gmann: thanks, yeah. I need to (re)check the process for that
13:07:23 <gmann> for tempest and patrole we are late i think
13:07:51 <paras333> gmann: but we do see our whitebox gate moved to focal
13:08:06 <gmann> masayukig: remember we need to do tox.ini changes carefully during office hour or so as that break the CI
13:08:32 <masayukig> gmann: yeah..
13:09:48 <masayukig> #action release for QA repos and sync up with release team for the steps wise work
13:10:40 <masayukig> ok, let's move on if nothing for this topic
13:11:04 <masayukig> #topic Victoria Priority Items progress
13:11:15 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-victoria-priority
13:11:31 <masayukig> please put updates if you have anything
13:12:36 <paras333> gmann: Can you review this hacking patch #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726696/ ? I have some nits that I can respin after your review
13:12:48 <gmann> paras333: sure, i can check today
13:12:58 <paras333> gmann: thank you!
13:13:19 <masayukig> cool
13:14:45 <masayukig> OK, I guess that's all for the victoria priority items updates, atm.
13:15:27 <masayukig> let's move on
13:15:32 <masayukig> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
13:16:10 <masayukig> We have 4 topics so far. https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-ptg
13:16:15 <masayukig> for the vPTG.
13:17:10 <masayukig> And, I've registered 4 slots for that at Juno room https://ethercalc.openstack.org/7xp2pcbh1ncb
13:17:31 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-ptg
13:17:32 <gmann> I will add few today or tomorrow
13:17:40 <masayukig> #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/7xp2pcbh1ncb
13:17:52 <masayukig> gmann: thanks!
13:18:38 <masayukig> yeah, please add items if you have something to discuss at the vPTG.
13:19:41 <masayukig> ok,let's move on to the next topic
13:19:45 <masayukig> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program)
13:19:55 <masayukig> Do you have any updates/highlights on the sub-projects such as Tempest, Patrole and Hacking?
13:20:06 <bigdogstl> Here is my final commit for improving the patrole gates #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/751157/This will make the slow test part of the voting gates. the failure I have seen outside of infra issues have been http client timeout so I increased it for all multimodes.
13:20:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
13:20:47 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
13:20:47 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
13:21:14 <gmann> bigdogstl: is that test timeout which was happening ?
13:21:44 <bigdogstl> yes
13:22:47 <gmann> strange, it should happen on tempest side also then
13:22:59 <gmann> tempest gate run multinode job also and slow job too
13:24:08 <bigdogstl> it is a patrole test that does backup and restore
13:24:55 <bigdogstl> it is failing on the same client api call as a similar tempest test
13:25:03 <bigdogstl> that passes
13:25:37 <bigdogstl> i recheck the commit many time to see what happens and I add summary to most of them
13:25:42 <gmann> yeah, tempest also has backup and restore tests which pass
13:26:04 <gmann> ok will take a look
13:26:17 <masayukig> thanks
13:26:24 <bigdogstl> I will recheck the commit every day to see what happens but it passes most of the time
13:26:45 <bigdogstl> right now all gates are failing even simple tox
13:26:50 <gmann> we are facing CI/CD  issue now
13:26:53 <bigdogstl> no all but most
13:26:58 <bigdogstl> ok
13:27:08 <gmann> yeah we need to wait for that first
13:27:14 <bigdogstl> ok
13:27:27 <gmann> other than that o-h gate is failing on py35 job now
13:28:01 <gmann> i have no bandwidth to debug that and fix
13:28:13 <masayukig> gmann: this one? #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750274/
13:28:28 <gmann> i was thinking if we can drop the py35 support from o-h ?
13:28:39 <gmann> yeah
13:29:16 <masayukig> yeah. hmm, "SyntaxError: invalid syntax" is weird..
13:30:01 <masayukig> any other projects have py35 job/support?
13:30:31 <gmann> we have for stackviz and hacking also
13:31:14 <masayukig> hmm, ok
13:31:40 <masayukig> I think we can drop the py35 if that doesn't have much value
13:31:45 <masayukig> But I'm not sure
13:32:04 <gmann> yeah, we have to do it in same patch, i can update after meeting if you can prove that
13:32:13 <gmann> approve that
13:32:25 <masayukig> ok, thank
13:33:18 <masayukig> anything else for this topic? otherwise, let's move on
13:33:38 <masayukig> #topic Community goal tracking
13:33:47 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-community-wide-goals-tracking
13:34:36 <masayukig> I've checked #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740373/ eslint-config-openstack
13:34:52 <openstackgerrit> Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/openstack-health master: Fix gate: define nodejs10 jobs  https://review.opendev.org/750274
13:34:56 <gmann> masayukig: ^^
13:35:06 <masayukig> But I don't know how to install sphinx-build in the environment
13:35:19 <gmann> yeah.
13:35:34 <gmann> container plugin is fixed and merged for focal
13:35:39 <masayukig> gmann: cool for the o-h patch. I'll take a look
13:35:57 <gmann> i think ceph is pending for barbican open bug
13:36:17 <gmann> and o-h, patch is up
13:36:56 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/750274
13:37:11 <masayukig> (Just for my reminder :-p
13:38:20 <masayukig> gmann: anything else?
13:38:31 <gmann> nothing from mw
13:38:33 <gmann> me
13:38:43 <masayukig> ok, thanks. let's move on
13:38:52 <masayukig> #topic Bug Triage
13:38:59 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-victoria
13:39:31 <kopecmartin> issue with cleanup race appeared again , but in different set of tests, there is a fix for that #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750329/
13:39:35 <bigdogstl> review request for port deletion timeout issue. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750329/ bug #1894835
13:39:37 <openstack> bug 1894835 in tempest "fix test_allowed_address_pair test case to fix race condition during network deletion" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894835 - Assigned to Gayathri Devi Kathiri (gayathridevikathiri)
13:40:26 <kopecmartin> while triaging, i also found this review, which is ready to be merged: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737074/
13:42:51 <kopecmartin> and the last thing, lpiwowar was helping us  all-plugin tox env removal, if you have some powers in the projects in question, please review: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/(status:open+OR+status:merged)+topic:fix/tox_env
13:42:57 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side
13:43:12 <masayukig> +A for the first one
13:45:08 <openstackgerrit> Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Test selinux labels in QEMU/KVM environment  https://review.opendev.org/745961
13:45:24 <masayukig> thanks, +A for the second one, too
13:45:24 <jparker> artom: I was referencing the multinode-devstack failure for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/745961/
13:45:49 <jparker> artom: thats related to https://review.opendev.org/#/c/751906/?
13:46:02 <artom> jparker, hrmm, maybe not...
13:46:31 <artom> Ah, wait
13:46:39 <artom> Sorry, was lost in all the logs/test reports
13:46:40 <gmann> what are the error
13:47:01 <artom> gmann, "ERROR: Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement oslo.log===4.4.0" looks like
13:47:14 <masayukig> we can move on to the next topic, probably
13:47:15 <masayukig> #topic Critical Reviews
13:47:37 <artom> Doh, there's a meeting happening, sorry
13:47:37 <paras333> but strange this wasn't seen here #https://review.opendev.org/#/c/751906/
13:47:52 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/751906/
13:48:08 <masayukig> artom: no worries :)
13:48:29 * artom is from Nova-land, meetings happen in a different channel, I didn't think to check. Apologies
13:49:19 <gmann> artom: you are on right topic in office hour
13:49:32 <masayukig> gmann: artom yeah
13:49:49 <gmann> artom: jparker currently all CI broken on pypi things, let's wait for that
13:50:17 <artom> gmann, ah, so not being able to install oslo.log is a known current issue?
13:50:27 <gmann> yeah, many other packages also
13:50:35 <artom> gmann, nice (well, "nice")
13:50:42 <artom> Means there's nothing for us to do ^_^
13:50:47 <gmann> yeah.
13:50:58 <masayukig> And, I think we can move on to the last topic
13:50:59 <masayukig> #topic Open Discussion
13:51:18 <artom> (Well, is there - something for us to do, that is? We can help tracking this down?)
13:51:20 <masayukig> We can discuss anything
13:53:12 <bigdogstl> has anyone tallked about adding different role support for primary and alt creds in the creds manager before
13:53:13 <paras333> Do we need to discuss the topic of having centralized run_validation in tempest scenario , the way we did for tempest api tests?
13:53:43 <gmann> paras333: we can do. this is good for PTG
13:53:56 <paras333> gmann: great
13:53:59 <masayukig> paras333: gmann yeah
13:54:00 <gmann> bigdogstl: you mean reader or customize one ?
13:54:14 <paras333> let me add this topic, we can discuss in more details how we can do that
13:54:15 <bigdogstl> custom ones more for downstream support
13:54:27 <masayukig> paras333++
13:54:59 <bigdogstl> I am thinking of adding a spec but want to see if the subject has been covered before
13:56:44 <masayukig> I'm not sure about it clearly, gmann do you remember that?
13:58:05 <bigdogstl> I will try to get to the spec patch set soon
13:58:46 <gmann_> bigdogstl: ok, we can discuss these in PTG also, do not forget to add in etherpad
13:59:07 <bigdogstl> ok
13:59:16 <masayukig> bigdogstl: bigdogstl thanks
13:59:45 <masayukig> OK, let's close the office hour
13:59:49 <masayukig> thank you all!!!
13:59:54 <masayukig> #endmeeting