14:01:09 <gmann> #startmeeting qa 14:01:10 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Nov 3 14:01:09 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gmann. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:14 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:01:22 <gmann> how all here today? 14:01:26 <gmann> how 14:01:28 <gmann> who 14:01:33 <kopecmartin> gmann: hi o/ 14:03:02 <paras333> o/ 14:03:16 <gmann> let's start 14:03:26 <gmann> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 14:03:28 <gmann> today agenda ^^ 14:03:39 <gmann> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 14:04:08 <gmann> one annoucncement is about new time of office hour which is now at 14 UTC (old time was 13 UTC) 14:04:44 <gmann> there is issue on eavesdrop for this updates which frickler already reported/discussing to opendev 14:04:59 <gmann> #topic Wallaby Priority Items progress 14:05:09 <gmann> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-priority 14:05:32 <gmann> this ^^ etherpad has all the working items we decided for wallaby cycle. 14:05:46 <gmann> I assigned the owner of each item 14:06:19 <paras333> ack, thanks 14:06:22 <gmann> any update on any of them? 14:06:37 <gmann> or we just finished the PTG so tracking in next week or so will be good 14:06:57 <paras333> yup, no update right now 14:07:20 <gmann> yeah form me too, nothing 14:07:22 <kopecmartin> tempest cleanup #link https://review.opendev.org/745814 ready for review, I resolved comments 14:07:36 <kopecmartin> but that's all for nw 14:07:37 <kopecmartin> now 14:07:44 <gmann> kopecmartin: thanks, will check today 14:08:00 <gmann> is DNM testing patch refreshed with new result or need recheck ? 14:08:32 <kopecmartin> yes, i put some links in the review to point out the results 14:08:39 <gmann> cool 14:08:45 <kopecmartin> i ran the DNM multiple times mocking different scenarios 14:09:03 <gmann> ko 14:09:05 <gmann> ok 14:09:46 <gmann> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:09:54 <gmann> we finished PTG last week 14:10:13 <gmann> I have also summarized it on ML, 14:10:21 <gmann> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-October/018346.html 14:10:22 <gmann> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-October/018365.html 14:11:09 <gmann> PTG seems ok but virtual summit was not so powerful for me :) 14:11:38 <gmann> #topic Sub Teams highlights 14:12:02 <gmann> Tempest 14:12:22 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 14:12:27 <gmann> we have lot of open review 14:12:52 <gmann> and lot of work in scenario manager #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/tempest-scenario-manager-stable+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 14:13:04 <gmann> I am adding these in my list 14:13:14 <kopecmartin> the scenario manager is going fine, most of the reviews are already up 14:13:27 <gmann> nice 14:14:14 <gmann> I am doing RBAC work review, my testing devstack patches still failing which i need to debug 14:14:42 <paras333> i have added one api test for test attach scsci disk with confid drive 14:14:48 <paras333> up for review #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/758848/ 14:15:12 <paras333> this was the issue we faced in nova when we enabled config drive with scsi disk 14:15:26 <paras333> #link https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867075 14:15:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1867075 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "Arm64: Instance with Configure Drive attach volume failed failed" [Low,Fix committed] - Assigned to sean mooney (sean-k-mooney) 14:15:35 <gmann> ok, I need to check that. have not looked yet 14:15:47 <paras333> yeah no problem, no rush on that 14:16:16 <gmann> Patrole 14:16:21 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:16:28 <gmann> not much progress in patrole side 14:16:41 <gmann> Hacking 14:16:43 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 14:16:59 <gmann> paras333: let's review the open one and then we can release hacking new version 14:17:12 <paras333> gmann: yeah sure 14:17:12 <gmann> I think sean two match we can merge 14:17:28 <paras333> yup I have looked it briefly, looks good to me 14:17:36 <paras333> i will review it today 14:17:41 <gmann> #action gmann paras333 to review the open patches for hacking and then release 14:17:43 <gmann> thanks 14:18:05 <paras333> can you show me how to do the release stuff, any patch to look at? 14:18:06 <gmann> from devstack side we have two things 14:18:29 <gmann> I can add one, its with independent release model and need PTL +1 14:19:03 <paras333> ack 14:19:23 <gmann> we do not have release liaison or QA i think and default is PTL. 14:19:43 <paras333> make sense 14:19:58 <gmann> to speed up things, i will ask masayukig to add me there so that we can merge things faster 14:20:21 <gmann> #action add release liaison in release team doc 14:21:03 <gmann> there is one issue reported from devstack side, comoute node failure is not reported early and it end up failing tests later - https://zuul.openstack.org/build/d6fa643e420644f1bc9d9ef5ab2427c1/log/job-output.txt#55340 14:21:46 <gmann> i need to check it after office hour, frickler idea is to fail it early which is how it should be 14:22:17 <gmann> anything else to updates form any subteam ? 14:23:08 <gmann> #topic Community goal tracking 14:23:28 <gmann> I need to update etherpad to add wallaby cycle goal. 14:23:50 <gmann> as per current goal proposal, we might not need any updates from QA side 14:24:06 <gmann> #topic Bug Triage 14:24:24 <kopecmartin> I prepared a few bugs to discuss here #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-wallaby 14:24:41 <kopecmartin> i'd start with pdf doc effort 14:24:47 <gmann> sure 14:24:57 <kopecmartin> i was checking how much is done and how much is missing 14:25:10 <kopecmartin> most of the reviews are already merged #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:feature/pdf_doc+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 14:25:26 <kopecmartin> there are a few projects though when I'm not sure what to do 14:25:30 <openstackgerrit> Lajos Katona proposed openstack/tempest master: Test for changing QoS policy with min bw of bound port https://review.opendev.org/743695 14:25:36 <kopecmartin> they're mentioned in the etherpad 14:25:58 <kopecmartin> those are the projects which don't have any zuul jobs implemented yet, most likely no documentation at all 14:26:21 <gmann> kopecmartin: for cookiecutter repo we do not need 14:26:25 <kopecmartin> thanks gmann, i see you're adding comments there 14:26:41 <kopecmartin> anyone please add your comments if you have any thoughts to the etherpad 14:27:31 <gmann> devstack-vagrant also same 14:27:51 <kopecmartin> i'll update the storyboard regarding the effort after the meeting #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006070 14:28:26 <kopecmartin> perfect thanks gmann for the comments 14:28:37 <kopecmartin> moving on #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673342/ 14:28:42 <gmann> kopecmartin: added comments on etherpad, let's skip those repo as no doc other than README 14:29:03 <kopecmartin> it has already core reviews, but i'd like to get more than just 2, just to be sure ;) 14:29:04 <gmann> kopecmartin: i had this open for review but did not di 14:29:06 <gmann> do 14:29:15 <gmann> I will do today for sure 14:29:31 <kopecmartin> perfect, moving on #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1844535 14:29:32 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1844535 in tempest "several tests fail when image_ref_alt is set to non-cirros image" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Weronika Sikora (shushuda) 14:29:44 <kopecmartin> i has a patch up #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682904/ 14:30:04 <kopecmartin> it's interesting bug, if we wanna support different images than just cirros - as we discussed on PTG - we might need it 14:30:38 <kopecmartin> s/support/'run on gates' 14:31:00 <gmann> did not we use image_ssh_user for sshing on those alt image > 14:31:01 <gmann> ? 14:31:51 <kopecmartin> yes 14:32:07 <kopecmartin> although the patch mentions an edge case i would say 14:32:19 <kopecmartin> At this moment, only image_ssh_user is present in the config 14:32:19 <kopecmartin> of Tempest. It's set to cirros by default and used for 14:32:19 <kopecmartin> SSH connections in tests. However, several tests build 14:32:21 <kopecmartin> instances with image_ref_alt, but still use image_ssh_user to 14:32:23 <kopecmartin> connect, which results in failure if image_ref_alt is set to 14:32:25 <kopecmartin> a non-cirros image. 14:32:29 <gmann> i see 14:33:03 <gmann> at first glance it make sense but i need to check how test using the alt images. 14:33:17 <kopecmartin> yup sure 14:33:32 <kopecmartin> moving on #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1861592 14:33:33 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861592 in tempest "Move 'gabbi_tempest_path' to gabbi-tempest plugin" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Martin Kopec (mkopec) 14:33:45 <gmann> i think we will find many such things when paras333 will have non-cirros image testing 14:34:03 <gmann> for gabbi-tempest plugin i think i had patch up 14:34:07 <kopecmartin> easy fix, however it's blocked on gabbi - its gate is failing 14:34:19 <kopecmartin> can anyone help us with fixing the gate? 14:34:23 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705339/ 14:34:32 <kopecmartin> i briefly checked it. however, didn't find the problem 14:34:50 <gmann> seems like it is not active anymore 14:34:53 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:x/gabbi-tempest 14:34:59 <paras333> gmann: yeah , I will check this bug while testing 14:35:00 <gmann> last patcch merged 2 years ago 14:35:09 <kopecmartin> ah 14:35:22 <gmann> after chris move away from openstack 14:35:51 <gmann> who all using gabbi-tempest ? 14:35:51 <kopecmartin> ok then, so there's nothing we can do about the bug then, i'll close it 14:35:56 <kopecmartin> i don't know :D 14:36:34 <gmann> seems heat, cinder, grenade 14:36:37 <gmann> #link http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=gabbi-tempest&i=nope&files=&repos= 14:37:11 <gmann> I think we need to cleanup this. I will check those usage and see if we can move the tempest var setting on users side 14:37:32 <gmann> and then update the tempest patch #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705340/ 14:37:48 <kopecmartin> sounds good 14:38:10 <gmann> I remember in past when tempest was not setting this var, few gabbi-tempest job failed 14:38:54 <gmann> If no maintainer for gabii-tempest then i think we need to move those jobs from gate or test in different way 14:39:05 <gmann> I will bring it on ML too 14:39:16 <kopecmartin> yeah, that'd be great 14:39:32 <gmann> #action gmann to bring the gabbi-tempest on ML and accordingly move forward on tempest bug 14:39:48 <tosky> cinder doesn't use it 14:40:05 <tosky> the file which contains that variable is only a copy of the tempest one 14:40:13 <tosky> I tried to keep the two files in sync 14:40:18 <gmann> i see 14:40:26 <tosky> I suspect it's the same for grenade 14:40:31 <tosky> the only user iirc is/was heat 14:40:36 <gmann> then we can first remove those if no gabbi -tempest used 14:40:53 <gmann> yeah heat i know they use but not sure job is passing fine or not 14:41:07 <gmann> ricolin: ^^ 14:41:53 <gmann> let's mvoe next 14:42:05 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1801159 14:42:07 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1801159 in tempest "test_dhcp_stateful_fixedips_duplicate and test_dhcp_stateful_fixedips works incorrect with Contrail SDN" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Mykola Yakovliev (vegasq) 14:42:11 <kopecmartin> it has a fix 14:42:19 <kopecmartin> but the problem is we can't verify the fix, the gates don't use Contrail SDN 14:42:31 <gmann> link? 14:42:44 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/614866 14:43:19 <gmann> i think we can ask neutron team to review this. 14:43:28 <gmann> slaweq: can you please check this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/614866/8 14:43:38 <slaweq> gmann: sure 14:43:38 <gmann> not urgent but whenever you have time 14:43:50 <slaweq> ok 14:43:50 <gmann> slaweq: thanks 14:44:11 <kopecmartin> perfect, moving on #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1860129 14:44:13 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1860129 in tempest "Tempest test tempest.scenario.test_network_basic_ops.TestNetworkBasicOps.test_subnet_details fails when there is some additional nameserver configured in guest VM" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq) 14:44:19 <kopecmartin> is it a bug when there is a non dns server in /etc/resolve.conf? 14:45:06 <kopecmartin> i guess slaweq could have some insight here too 14:45:47 <kopecmartin> i see you had a review up, but then you abandoned it .. should it be addressed on tempest is the final question :) 14:46:00 <slaweq> I thinkn that this can be closed 14:46:04 <slaweq> sorry for the noise 14:46:22 <kopecmartin> ok, np 14:46:29 <gmann> cool, thanks 14:46:41 <kopecmartin> next #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1863161 14:46:43 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1863161 in tempest "stackviz failing on stable jobs with py3.5 while installation" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Ghanshyam Mann (ghanshyammann) 14:46:48 <kopecmartin> do we still need to keep this bug open? 14:46:56 <gmann> stackviz was fixed and we have job also runnign there 14:47:26 <gmann> but we thought of not failing job on stackviz failure which i had tempest patch up but did not update it 14:47:35 <gmann> I will er-look that and update on etehrpad 14:47:44 <kopecmartin> gmann: thanks 14:47:58 <kopecmartin> another for discussion #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1827065 14:48:00 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1827065 in tempest "Add support for setting quotas for dynamic users" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Martin Kopec (mkopec) 14:48:03 <kopecmartin> Add support for setting quotas for dynamic users 14:48:10 <kopecmartin> this might be beneficial in cases the default quota in the deployment is too small for tempest tests to pass 14:48:16 <kopecmartin> basically it's adding an option for a user to set a different than default quotas in the test projects created by Tempest 14:49:00 <gmann> last time i asked about exact use case for this 14:49:14 <gmann> Temepst run on default quota 14:49:37 <gmann> I think we can mark as incomplete untill author reply the use case 14:49:54 <kopecmartin> i think the author replied, let me check 14:50:14 <kopecmartin> this was the reply in the review: "The issue is when your default quota is too small for a test to pass, but may be functional for other use cases." 14:50:32 <gmann> is there reivew for that? 14:50:41 <kopecmartin> it's definitely not very often use case 14:50:44 <kopecmartin> yeah #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656534/ 14:51:23 <gmann> thanks 14:51:39 <gmann> i did not notice that on review, my bad. I will reply on review 14:51:58 <kopecmartin> ok, thanks 14:52:11 <kopecmartin> moving on #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1764375 14:52:13 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1764375 in tempest "Support for HTTP proxy URL is broken" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Federico Ressi (fressi-redhat) 14:52:16 <kopecmartin> still valid? 14:54:08 <gmann> patch is abandon so not sure it is valid, i cannot remember exact note on this. may be we need to try this before closing 14:54:40 <kopecmartin> ok 14:54:46 <gmann> let's triage further in next office hours as we need to cover open discussion also. 14:55:08 <kopecmartin> ok, we made some progress, which is awesome 14:55:33 <gmann> thanks kopecmartin for er-starting it, this is how our office hour become more productive by spending at elast 30 min on bugs discussion 14:55:51 <gmann> #topic Critical Reviews 14:56:19 <gmann> I think we should rename this to 'Urgent/Gate Fixes Review' 14:56:24 <gmann> what you say 14:56:38 <gmann> and only track urgent or gate fixes here as urgent review 14:57:23 <kopecmartin> agree, would be more descriptive 14:57:33 <gmann> yeah, I will update it 14:57:37 <gmann> #topic Open Discussion 14:57:49 <gmann> there is one item there 14:57:51 <gmann> (TomStappaerts) Devstack does not work on centos8 with stable/ussuri. I backported a fix here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746500/ . Are there other actions we need to do? 14:58:13 <gmann> this patch is merged, not sure if centos8 job still failing ? 14:59:00 <gmann> it is passing here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/756489/ 14:59:26 <gmann> so no action item for this 14:59:30 <gmann> i will remove it from agenda 15:00:19 <gmann> also i am thinking we should move 'Critical Review' and 'Open Discussion' topic above bug triage so that we can spend last 30 min on bug things and also cover open discussion if there are many items there 15:00:39 <kopecmartin> makes sense 15:00:44 <gmann> like cover everything first in first 30 in min and then bug 15:00:53 <gmann> k i will update agenda 15:01:05 <gmann> #action gmann to updatae agenda to move Bug triage at last 15:01:26 <gmann> thats all for today, thanks all for joining 15:01:33 <gmann> #endmeeting