14:00:42 <masayukig> #startmeeting qa 14:00:42 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jan 12 14:00:42 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:43 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:45 <gmann> kopecmartin: ack, 14:00:46 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:01:02 <masayukig> Hi, who all here today? 14:01:05 <gmann> o/ 14:01:40 <masayukig> OK, let's start 14:01:47 <paras333> hey 14:01:54 <masayukig> hi 14:01:56 <masayukig> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 14:02:03 <masayukig> ^^^^^^ today's agenda 14:02:09 <yoctozepto> \o/ 14:02:31 <yoctozepto> happy new year folks 14:02:43 <masayukig> happy new year!! :) 14:02:46 <masayukig> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 14:03:05 <masayukig> I have no announcement and action item this time 14:03:09 <masayukig> let's skip 14:03:21 <masayukig> #topic Wallaby Priority Items progress 14:03:32 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-priority 14:03:47 <gmann> happy new year yoctozepto 14:04:22 <masayukig> any updates on the priority? 14:04:58 <gmann> I pushed few review on previous deprecated things to remove and microversion gap 14:05:21 <masayukig> thanks, cool 14:05:52 <gmann> these need review 14:05:54 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/698754/6 14:06:03 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/698773/4 14:06:04 <paras333> gmann: masayukig: I am refactoring some of the scenario test, can I get an early review for run_validation one #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/763925 I am just trying to think if this is the best way to do it or if we have any other idea 14:06:15 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/735631 14:06:50 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/768759 14:07:14 <gmann> paras333: sure I will check 14:07:23 <paras333> cool, thanks 14:07:33 <gmann> paras333: does this impact any old behavior, as zuul is not happy 14:08:02 <masayukig> paras333 gmann: thanks. I'll check them tomorrow 14:08:32 <paras333> gmann: yeah currently it seems it might be impacting other scenario test that I need to check, I will just trigger the job again to see the gate jobs 14:09:27 <gmann> paras333: ohk, because it should keep existing things same and just provide a config to disable the ssh. and in upstream CI we enable it by default 14:09:43 <gmann> or run_validation is disable by deafult? 14:10:00 <paras333> It's enabled by default 14:10:04 <gmann> yeah 14:10:07 <gmann> #link https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/fec2c93cdcc14ad08d0a35136ee287525e7a4879/tempest/config.py#L836 14:11:21 <gmann> other part on wallaby things are 'new RBAC testing with system scope support in Tempest' 14:11:34 <gmann> this has been pending since long due to lack of review 14:11:36 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22admin-auth-system-scope%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) 14:12:12 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22system_scope_testing%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) 14:12:17 <paras333> Is it in relation to new Secure RBAC feature? 14:12:34 <gmann> I am going to debug the failure today but any help will be appreciated 14:13:00 <gmann> paras333: system scope support in Tempest which are new policy 14:13:14 <paras333> gmann: ack 14:13:40 <gmann> that is all from my side on wallaby 14:13:57 <masayukig> thanks 14:14:12 <masayukig> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:14:24 <masayukig> I think we can skip this 14:14:32 <gmann> yeah 14:14:38 <masayukig> #topic Gate Status Checks 14:14:54 <masayukig> How's the gate status? 14:15:40 <gmann> stable gate until stein is fixed and green now 14:15:55 <gmann> but we are waiting to merge these two backport for rocky and queens 14:15:57 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522bug/1909018%2522+status:open 14:16:52 <gmann> nova gate encounter multiple network error again in nova-next job 14:17:18 <gmann> we fixed those in API tests and thought this is not issue for scenario tests. but it is 14:17:38 <gmann> I explained it in bug #link https://launchpad.net/bugs/1844568 14:17:39 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1844568 in tempest "[compute] "create_test_server" if networks is undefined and more than one network is present" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Ghanshyam Mann (ghanshyammann) 14:17:57 <gmann> and fixing here #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/770169 14:18:27 <gmann> but seems few test are not happy with default network and not reachable. I need to debug it and proceed 14:19:18 <gmann> patrole gate is fixed along with stein gate removal #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/768119 14:19:29 <masayukig> gmann: +A for the devstack patches 14:19:35 <gmann> thanks 14:19:58 <gmann> those are gate updates from my side today 14:20:06 <masayukig> thanks 14:20:53 <masayukig> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 14:21:10 <masayukig> How about the periodic jobs? 14:21:14 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 14:21:19 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic 14:21:35 <gmann> seems tempest-full-victoria-py3 failing with network timeout but that might be temporary as it is running fine on master gate 14:22:01 <gmann> tempest-all is still broken on file injection 14:23:04 <gmann> i do not think i will have time in this week to have a look. 14:23:33 <masayukig> me neither.. :/ 14:23:45 <soniya29> gmann, As discussed in the wallaby ptg, I wanted to help in patrole stable release, but dont know where to start. How can I help there? 14:24:04 <gmann> soniya29: hi, that will be great 14:24:31 <gmann> soniya29: I can get you some link for framework code which can be good start, after office hour 14:24:47 <masayukig> great! 14:24:57 <soniya29> gmann, thanks! 14:25:12 <gmann> soniya29: one of the key thing we need there is to support the pre provisioned account completely and test it 14:25:22 <gmann> anyways will get in touch after office hour 14:25:26 <soniya29> gmann, sure 14:25:37 <masayukig> OK, let's move on to the next topic 14:25:42 <masayukig> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 14:26:34 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 14:26:43 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:26:51 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open 14:26:59 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open 14:27:06 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 14:27:19 <soniya29> gmann, masayukig, sceanario manager is almost complete, two patches are already on the gerrit and apart from that i dont think there is something left. 14:27:42 <masayukig> soniya29++ cool 14:27:47 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/tempest-scenario-manager-stable+status:open 14:27:48 <gmann> soniya29: great, I will review those today and then we can have audit if anything left 14:27:52 <soniya29> if you can go through it whenever you have time, we can think about stable release of it 14:28:44 <gmann> nice 14:28:52 <masayukig> great 14:29:27 <masayukig> anything else on this topic? 14:29:37 <soniya29> gmann, sure 14:30:20 <gmann> I think we need to increase the tempest review which are slow. devstack is somehow not so bad. grenade and hacking and other projects are in control 14:30:20 <masayukig> OK, next topic 14:30:51 <gmann> yeah let's move to next 14:31:03 <masayukig> gmann: thanks. ok, I'll allocate my time to review tempest patches 14:31:16 <gmann> thanks 14:31:17 <masayukig> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change 14:31:35 <masayukig> Any other urgent patches to review? 14:33:25 <yoctozepto> none urgent on devstack side 14:33:42 <yoctozepto> we could drop opensuse per what frickler proposed 14:34:09 <yoctozepto> but that's far from urgent, even though making a lot of sense to do sooner than later (to save cycles) 14:34:41 <masayukig> yeah, I agree 14:35:05 <gmann> yeah i agree, most of time it was Andreas maintaining those 14:35:54 <gmann> yoctozepto: we need to think on TC testing runtime also as opensuse is one of distro listed there so devstack removal can impact that. so may be remove from there first 14:36:01 <gmann> frickler: ^^ 14:36:05 <masayukig> I feel it's kind of the next topic :) 14:36:09 <masayukig> #topic Open Discussion 14:36:29 <yoctozepto> masayukig: yeah, could be :-) 14:37:06 <yoctozepto> so frickler dropping opensuse job himself means no future for opensuse testing 14:37:10 <gmann> yoctozepto: frickler we can remove it from X cycle testing runtime. 14:37:50 <masayukig> indeed 14:37:52 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/769884 14:39:44 <gmann> I will that in TC meeting topic and notify it to TC as well update testing runtime doc too 14:40:05 <masayukig> gmann: thanks, cool 14:41:32 <masayukig> #topic Bug Triage (last 30 min) 14:41:43 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-wallaby 14:41:57 <masayukig> But kopecmartin isn't this time 14:42:42 <masayukig> It seems that the number of bugs are the same as previous. 14:43:18 <gmann> any critical or high priority one we can check 14:44:09 <masayukig> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1909018 14:44:10 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1909018 in devstack "ImportError: No module named keystonemiddleware.auth_token" [Critical,Fix committed] - Assigned to Ghanshyam Mann (ghanshyammann) 14:44:33 <masayukig> This is the one but I already +A for the patches 14:44:49 <gmann> ok 14:45:31 <masayukig> I don't see any other high priority ones 14:46:35 <masayukig> OK, anything else to discuss? 14:46:59 <gmann> nothing from my side 14:47:13 <masayukig> Thanks. Let's close the office hour. 14:47:20 <masayukig> Thank you all!!! 14:47:25 <masayukig> #endmeeting