14:00:12 <masayukig> #startmeeting qa 14:00:13 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb 9 14:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:17 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:00:30 <masayukig> who all here today? 14:00:42 <kopecmartin> hi o/ 14:02:03 <rh-jelabarre> physically or mentally? 14:02:33 <gmann> o/ 14:02:44 <soniya29> hello 14:02:46 <masayukig> ok, let's start 14:02:49 <masayukig> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours 14:02:56 <masayukig> today's agenda ^^^^^ 14:03:07 <masayukig> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 14:03:34 <masayukig> I can see one AI: ACTION: gmann to propose single core review merge policy for Tempest 14:03:43 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/774012 14:03:59 <gmann> ^^ i pushed the change, 14:04:15 <masayukig> gmann: yeah, thanks. I'll +A after the office hour 14:04:44 <gmann> basically it will speed up the merging and if we see there is complex review then we can always wait for 2nd core or ask on irc 14:04:50 <gmann> core or any other expert 14:05:24 <masayukig> yeah, that should be the good option 14:05:30 <gmann> masayukig: I would like zhufl to notice this and provide her opinion as she is also partial active core and does review 14:05:54 <gmann> oh she is +2 14:05:58 <masayukig> yeah, :) 14:06:11 <gmann> we can merge after office hour. +1 14:06:18 <masayukig> thanks 14:06:32 <masayukig> #topic Wallaby Priority Items progress 14:06:37 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-priority 14:06:50 <masayukig> any updates for the priorities? 14:07:50 <gmann> I have few patches for secure rbac 14:07:52 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522secure-rbac%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/tempest 14:08:00 <kopecmartin> regarding 'Remove/migrate the .testr.conf to .stestr' I updated the etherpad 14:08:01 <gmann> few fix and reno etc. 14:08:01 <kopecmartin> #link Remove/migrate the .testr.conf to .stestr 14:08:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/enkM4eeDHObSloTjPGAu 14:08:38 <gmann> first 3 are good to go, and I am working on project alt admin/reader things 14:09:12 <gmann> kopecmartin: great, how much work needed? 14:09:15 <masayukig> kopecmartin: cool, thanks 14:09:42 <gmann> i see , we still have lot of pending repo there 14:09:53 <kopecmartin> speaking about projects which have .testr and .stestr.conf , most reviews are merged 14:10:01 <kopecmartin> except this one 14:10:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common-tempest-plugin/+/729161 14:10:23 <kopecmartin> in regards of the other projects, which haven't migrated to stestr yet 14:10:34 <gmann> yeah 14:10:35 <kopecmartin> some of them are retired, so i marked them so in the eth 14:11:21 <gmann> +1, we do not need too worry about retired or inactive repo 14:11:22 <kopecmartin> but there is still a good number of those which haven't migrated yet 14:11:36 <tosky> uh, cinder-tempest-plugin, I haven't noticed - I can take care of it 14:11:38 <kopecmartin> however i think we don't have bandwidth to deal with them 14:11:47 <masayukig> tosky++ thanks 14:12:06 <kopecmartin> we can maybe write an email to ask maintainers to do so? 14:12:30 <kopecmartin> because in general it seems this effort is forgotten, so maybe a small reminder will help things 14:12:31 <masayukig> kopecmartin: that sounds a good idea 14:12:55 <gmann> yeah, we can ask on ML 14:13:30 <kopecmartin> ok, i can send it 14:13:42 <masayukig> thanks 14:14:49 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side 14:15:28 <masayukig> OK, let's move on if nothing 14:15:53 <masayukig> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:16:08 <masayukig> I have nothing for this topic. Let's skip 14:16:15 <masayukig> #topic Gate Status Checks 14:16:41 <masayukig> any gate failures? 14:17:21 <gmann> one is this about multiple network one 14:17:23 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/770169 14:17:35 <gmann> this will fix the scenario test failure we are seeing in nova-next job 14:18:15 <gmann> and there is another py2 job failing on stable/train which still in progress in debugging 14:18:40 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-generic-switch/+/773335 14:18:52 <masayukig> +A for 770169 14:20:09 <masayukig> thanks 14:20:11 <gmann> other than that I think there is no other failure or fix we need to discuss 14:20:47 <masayukig> thanks! great 14:21:09 <masayukig> OK, let's move on 14:21:12 <masayukig> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 14:21:25 <gmann> victoria and train job failed once but they are green now. 14:21:34 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 14:21:50 <masayukig> yeah 14:22:10 <masayukig> not that much 14:22:13 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic 14:23:05 <gmann> as tempest-all is failing for known issue, I think we should either skip the personality tests or fix it. 14:23:20 <masayukig> +1 14:23:37 <gmann> I think we can skip it until bug is fixed 14:23:53 <gmann> I can push patch after office hour 14:24:12 <masayukig> gmann: ++ cool, thanks 14:24:47 <masayukig> let's move on to the next topic 14:24:51 <masayukig> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 14:25:45 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open 14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open 14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 14:26:17 <gmann> may be we can discuss one by one 14:26:30 <gmann> for tempest, 14:26:32 <masayukig> OK, how about Tempst? 14:26:48 <gmann> i have few review as i mentioned earlier 14:26:51 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522secure-rbac%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/tempest 14:27:03 <gmann> first 3 which is needed for secure rbac testing 14:27:15 <gmann> if we can merge those then it will be helpful to proceed on this 14:27:54 <kopecmartin> sure, i'll have a look 14:27:59 <gmann> thanks 14:28:06 <gmann> for two you are already +2 14:28:18 <kopecmartin> oh yeah, i see, i'll the third one then 14:28:27 <gmann> thanks 14:28:33 <gmann> and other thing is I am removing the 'member' role configuration from devstack 14:28:35 <gmann> #link and other thing is I am removing the 'member' role configuration 14:28:47 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/774524 14:29:00 <gmann> this is needed to let reader role testing in Tempest 14:29:15 <gmann> I am testing it in multiple project gate #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22tempest-no-member%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) 14:29:33 <gmann> few are failing which i have note checked yet if they are related failure 14:30:03 <gmann> I think more eyes from Tempest core can help in case we miss or break anyone with this? 14:30:54 <kopecmartin> definitely 14:31:20 <kopecmartin> just fyi, I abandoned several open changes today - all more than 3 years old associated to a bug which was either fixed /invalid / won't fix or expired 14:31:28 <gmann> great 14:31:47 <kopecmartin> whenever i will have some time, i'll try to go through old reviews 14:32:10 <gmann> yeah I will plan that, that will help to focus on active or needed incoming requests 14:32:26 <masayukig> gmann: +A for the first two 14:32:35 <gmann> masayukig: thanks 14:32:45 <gmann> that is all on Tempest form me 14:32:48 <gmann> from 14:32:53 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/768583 14:32:56 <kopecmartin> the inclusive change 14:33:19 <kopecmartin> it got tested by the dnm patches gmann created 14:33:34 <kopecmartin> to simulate tempest usage in older releases and etc 14:33:36 <gmann> kopecmartin: ah i missed to re review those 14:33:38 <kopecmartin> seems it's working 14:33:50 <gmann> great, let me check it today 14:34:03 <kopecmartin> thanks 14:34:22 <masayukig> Thanks, how about patrole? 14:34:24 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:34:47 <gmann> no progress or update to share on patrole 14:34:53 <masayukig> ok, thanks 14:35:00 <masayukig> And devstack? 14:35:01 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open 14:35:29 <gmann> we have few work need attention 14:35:43 <gmann> one is parallel one, #link Devstack, we have https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522async%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/devstack 14:35:56 <gmann> other is volume quota which is gate fix 14:36:12 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/774172 14:37:56 <gmann> Grenade- no progress on open review, I will add those in my this week list. 14:38:20 <masayukig> parallel ones are very interesting for the gate performance. 14:38:32 <gmann> yeah 14:39:04 <gmann> Hacking - -c job with direct deps which is only flake8 :) work fine #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/hacking/+/773814 14:39:22 <gmann> I am testing it in more projects and will post it in ML thread 14:39:42 <gmann> and based on consensus we can proceed on this 14:39:52 <masayukig> gmann: +1 14:40:24 <masayukig> let's move on if nothing 14:40:54 <masayukig> #link Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change 14:41:01 <gmann> yeah 14:41:10 <masayukig> any gate blocker or urgent changes? 14:42:53 <masayukig> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change 14:42:55 <masayukig> oops 14:43:19 <masayukig> any gate blocker or urgent changes? I think we already talked about this 14:43:47 <gmann> may be we can remove this topic and cover in gate status only? 14:44:09 <masayukig> yeah +1 14:44:14 <gmann> or track the Review Priority label with +2 14:44:19 <gmann> that can help 14:44:48 <gmann> I can build a query for that and add under this topic so that we review them on priority in office hour 14:45:50 <kopecmartin> sounds good 14:46:16 <masayukig> yeah, I agree with it. 14:47:00 <masayukig> OK, the next topic is appropriate? :) 14:47:03 <masayukig> #topic Open Discussion 14:48:12 <gmann> yeah in case if anyone would like to discuss anything so it provide room for that 14:48:28 <gmann> if no optic under it then we can just skip it 14:48:31 <gmann> topic 14:49:09 <masayukig> ok 14:49:29 <masayukig> anyway, any topics to discuss? 14:51:29 <gmann> we can move to bug triage 14:51:35 <gmann> less time left fot hat 14:51:36 <masayukig> ok 14:51:37 <gmann> for that 14:51:51 <masayukig> #topic Bug Triage 14:51:58 <gmann> one bug is this which is for stable/rocky #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1914037 14:52:00 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1914037 in tempest "scenario tests tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress fails" [Medium,Triaged] 14:52:11 <gmann> I agree with slaweq proposal of 'creating subnet in "public" network from different CIDR' 14:52:20 <gmann> kopecmartin: what you say? 14:52:30 <kopecmartin> gmann: yeah, that makes sense 14:52:32 <gmann> slaweq: do you have any patch up for that? 14:53:40 <kopecmartin> meanwhile 14:53:42 <kopecmartin> #link #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1613819 14:53:44 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1613819 in tempest "v3 credentials client does not honour the configured domain" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Lukas Piwowarski (lukas-piwowarski) 14:53:52 <kopecmartin> it's a high priority and it has a fix, please review 14:54:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/642237 14:54:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1914620 14:54:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1914620 in tempest "test_wait_for_volume_attachment_not_present fails with StopIteration" [Undecided,New] 14:54:40 <kopecmartin> a few times our gates failed on one of the unit tests with StopIteration error 14:54:42 <gmann> ah yeah, its in my list but forgot. let me do it today 14:54:57 <kopecmartin> however i'm not sure we can address that from tempest 14:55:34 <kopecmartin> it seems it's random python error , but i haven't dig deeper 14:56:05 <slaweq> gmann: nope 14:56:25 <slaweq> I didn't work on that at all, just commented in the LP 14:56:34 <gmann> i see. 14:57:14 <gmann> kopecmartin: on StopIteration, how frequent is that? 14:57:27 <kopecmartin> i think i saw that twice 14:57:32 <kopecmartin> not frequent 14:58:12 <kopecmartin> i tried to run it locally in a loop with different py versions i didn't hit the issue 14:59:42 <gmann> I saw temp dir error also yesterday, do we have bug for that if not i can add for tracking 15:00:02 <gmann> that happen in unit tests 15:00:25 <kopecmartin> we don't 15:00:26 <kopecmartin> sure 15:00:31 <gmann> k 15:00:34 <masayukig> sorry for my time management. We're running out of time 15:00:43 <masayukig> Let's close the office hour 15:00:49 <kopecmartin> that temp dir issue is more frequent than StopIteration 15:00:50 <kopecmartin> masayukig: sure 15:00:55 <gmann> yeah 15:00:58 <masayukig> #endmeeting