14:00:12 <masayukig> #startmeeting qa
14:00:13 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Feb  9 14:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:17 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
14:00:30 <masayukig> who all here today?
14:00:42 <kopecmartin> hi o/
14:02:03 <rh-jelabarre> physically or mentally?
14:02:33 <gmann> o/
14:02:44 <soniya29> hello
14:02:46 <masayukig> ok, let's start
14:02:49 <masayukig> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours
14:02:56 <masayukig> today's agenda ^^^^^
14:03:07 <masayukig> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
14:03:34 <masayukig> I can see one AI: ACTION: gmann to propose single core review merge policy for Tempest
14:03:43 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/774012
14:03:59 <gmann> ^^ i pushed the change,
14:04:15 <masayukig> gmann: yeah, thanks. I'll +A after the office hour
14:04:44 <gmann> basically it will speed up the merging and if we see there is complex review then we can always wait for 2nd core or ask on irc
14:04:50 <gmann> core or any other expert
14:05:24 <masayukig> yeah, that should be the good option
14:05:30 <gmann> masayukig: I would like zhufl to notice this and provide her opinion as she is also partial active core and does review
14:05:54 <gmann> oh she is +2
14:05:58 <masayukig> yeah, :)
14:06:11 <gmann> we can merge after office hour. +1
14:06:18 <masayukig> thanks
14:06:32 <masayukig> #topic Wallaby Priority Items progress
14:06:37 <masayukig> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-priority
14:06:50 <masayukig> any updates for the priorities?
14:07:50 <gmann> I have few patches for secure rbac
14:07:52 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522secure-rbac%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/tempest
14:08:00 <kopecmartin> regarding 'Remove/migrate the .testr.conf to .stestr' I updated the etherpad
14:08:01 <gmann> few fix and reno etc.
14:08:01 <kopecmartin> #link Remove/migrate the .testr.conf to .stestr
14:08:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/enkM4eeDHObSloTjPGAu
14:08:38 <gmann> first 3 are good to go, and I am working on project alt admin/reader things
14:09:12 <gmann> kopecmartin: great, how much work needed?
14:09:15 <masayukig> kopecmartin: cool, thanks
14:09:42 <gmann> i see , we still have lot of pending repo there
14:09:53 <kopecmartin> speaking about projects which have .testr and .stestr.conf , most reviews are merged
14:10:01 <kopecmartin> except this one
14:10:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common-tempest-plugin/+/729161
14:10:23 <kopecmartin> in regards of the other projects, which haven't migrated to stestr yet
14:10:34 <gmann> yeah
14:10:35 <kopecmartin> some of them are retired, so i marked them so in the eth
14:11:21 <gmann> +1, we do not need too worry about retired or inactive repo
14:11:22 <kopecmartin> but there is still a good number of those which haven't migrated yet
14:11:36 <tosky> uh, cinder-tempest-plugin, I haven't noticed - I can take care of it
14:11:38 <kopecmartin> however i think we don't have bandwidth to deal with them
14:11:47 <masayukig> tosky++ thanks
14:12:06 <kopecmartin> we can maybe write an email to ask maintainers to do so?
14:12:30 <kopecmartin> because in general it seems this effort is forgotten, so maybe a small reminder will help things
14:12:31 <masayukig> kopecmartin: that sounds a good idea
14:12:55 <gmann> yeah, we can ask on ML
14:13:30 <kopecmartin> ok, i can send it
14:13:42 <masayukig> thanks
14:14:49 <kopecmartin> that's all from my side
14:15:28 <masayukig> OK, let's move on if nothing
14:15:53 <masayukig> #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning
14:16:08 <masayukig> I have nothing for this topic. Let's skip
14:16:15 <masayukig> #topic Gate Status Checks
14:16:41 <masayukig> any gate failures?
14:17:21 <gmann> one is this about multiple network one
14:17:23 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/770169
14:17:35 <gmann> this will fix the scenario test failure we are seeing in nova-next job
14:18:15 <gmann> and there is another py2 job failing on stable/train which still in progress in debugging
14:18:40 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-generic-switch/+/773335
14:18:52 <masayukig> +A for 770169
14:20:09 <masayukig> thanks
14:20:11 <gmann> other than that I think there is no other failure or fix we need to discuss
14:20:47 <masayukig> thanks! great
14:21:09 <masayukig> OK, let's move on
14:21:12 <masayukig> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
14:21:25 <gmann> victoria and train job failed once but they are green now.
14:21:34 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
14:21:50 <masayukig> yeah
14:22:10 <masayukig> not that much
14:22:13 <masayukig> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic
14:23:05 <gmann> as tempest-all is failing for known issue, I think we should either skip the personality tests or fix it.
14:23:20 <masayukig> +1
14:23:37 <gmann> I think we can skip it until bug is fixed
14:23:53 <gmann> I can push patch after office hour
14:24:12 <masayukig> gmann: ++ cool, thanks
14:24:47 <masayukig> let's move on to the next topic
14:24:51 <masayukig> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program)
14:25:45 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open
14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open
14:25:46 <masayukig> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
14:26:17 <gmann> may be we can discuss one by one
14:26:30 <gmann> for tempest,
14:26:32 <masayukig> OK, how about Tempst?
14:26:48 <gmann> i have few review as i mentioned earlier
14:26:51 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522secure-rbac%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/tempest
14:27:03 <gmann> first 3 which is needed for secure rbac testing
14:27:15 <gmann> if we can merge those then it will be helpful to proceed on this
14:27:54 <kopecmartin> sure, i'll have a look
14:27:59 <gmann> thanks
14:28:06 <gmann> for two you are already +2
14:28:18 <kopecmartin> oh yeah, i see, i'll the third one then
14:28:27 <gmann> thanks
14:28:33 <gmann> and other thing is I am removing the 'member' role configuration from devstack
14:28:35 <gmann> #link and other thing is I am removing the 'member' role configuration
14:28:47 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/774524
14:29:00 <gmann> this is needed to let reader role testing in Tempest
14:29:15 <gmann> I am testing it in multiple project gate #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22tempest-no-member%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
14:29:33 <gmann> few are failing which i have note checked yet if they are related failure
14:30:03 <gmann> I think more eyes  from Tempest core can help in case we miss or break anyone with this?
14:30:54 <kopecmartin> definitely
14:31:20 <kopecmartin> just fyi, I abandoned several open changes today - all more than 3 years old associated to a bug which was either fixed /invalid / won't fix or expired
14:31:28 <gmann> great
14:31:47 <kopecmartin> whenever i will have some time, i'll try to go through old reviews
14:32:10 <gmann> yeah I will plan that, that will help to focus on active or needed incoming requests
14:32:26 <masayukig> gmann: +A for the first two
14:32:35 <gmann> masayukig: thanks
14:32:45 <gmann> that is all on Tempest form me
14:32:48 <gmann> from
14:32:53 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/768583
14:32:56 <kopecmartin> the inclusive change
14:33:19 <kopecmartin> it got tested by the dnm patches gmann created
14:33:34 <kopecmartin> to simulate tempest usage in older releases and etc
14:33:36 <gmann> kopecmartin: ah i missed to re review those
14:33:38 <kopecmartin> seems it's working
14:33:50 <gmann> great, let me check it today
14:34:03 <kopecmartin> thanks
14:34:22 <masayukig> Thanks, how about patrole?
14:34:24 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
14:34:47 <gmann> no progress or update to share on patrole
14:34:53 <masayukig> ok, thanks
14:35:00 <masayukig> And devstack?
14:35:01 <masayukig> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open
14:35:29 <gmann> we have few work need attention
14:35:43 <gmann> one is parallel one, #link Devstack, we have https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522async%2522+(status:open+OR+status:merged)+project:openstack/devstack
14:35:56 <gmann> other is volume quota which is gate fix
14:36:12 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/774172
14:37:56 <gmann> Grenade- no progress on open review, I will add those in my this week list.
14:38:20 <masayukig> parallel ones are very interesting for the gate performance.
14:38:32 <gmann> yeah
14:39:04 <gmann> Hacking - -c job with direct deps which is only flake8 :) work fine #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/hacking/+/773814
14:39:22 <gmann> I am testing it in more projects and will post it in ML thread
14:39:42 <gmann> and based on consensus we can proceed on this
14:39:52 <masayukig> gmann: +1
14:40:24 <masayukig> let's move on if nothing
14:40:54 <masayukig> #link Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change
14:41:01 <gmann> yeah
14:41:10 <masayukig> any gate blocker or urgent changes?
14:42:53 <masayukig> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change
14:42:55 <masayukig> oops
14:43:19 <masayukig> any gate blocker or urgent changes? I think we already talked about this
14:43:47 <gmann> may be we can remove this topic and cover in gate status only?
14:44:09 <masayukig> yeah +1
14:44:14 <gmann> or track the Review Priority label with +2
14:44:19 <gmann> that can help
14:44:48 <gmann> I can build a query for that and add under this topic so that we review them on priority in office hour
14:45:50 <kopecmartin> sounds good
14:46:16 <masayukig> yeah, I agree with it.
14:47:00 <masayukig> OK, the next topic is appropriate? :)
14:47:03 <masayukig> #topic Open Discussion
14:48:12 <gmann> yeah in case if anyone would like to discuss anything so it provide room for that
14:48:28 <gmann> if no optic under it then we can just skip it
14:48:31 <gmann> topic
14:49:09 <masayukig> ok
14:49:29 <masayukig> anyway, any topics to discuss?
14:51:29 <gmann> we can move to bug triage
14:51:35 <gmann> less time left fot hat
14:51:36 <masayukig> ok
14:51:37 <gmann> for that
14:51:51 <masayukig> #topic Bug Triage
14:51:58 <gmann> one bug is this which is for stable/rocky #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1914037
14:52:00 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1914037 in tempest "scenario tests tempest.scenario.test_network_v6.TestGettingAddress fails" [Medium,Triaged]
14:52:11 <gmann> I agree with slaweq proposal of 'creating subnet in "public" network from different CIDR'
14:52:20 <gmann> kopecmartin: what you say?
14:52:30 <kopecmartin> gmann: yeah, that makes sense
14:52:32 <gmann> slaweq: do you have any patch up for that?
14:53:40 <kopecmartin> meanwhile
14:53:42 <kopecmartin> #link #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1613819
14:53:44 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1613819 in tempest "v3 credentials client does not honour the configured domain" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Lukas Piwowarski (lukas-piwowarski)
14:53:52 <kopecmartin> it's a high priority and it has a fix, please review
14:54:03 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/642237
14:54:27 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1914620
14:54:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1914620 in tempest "test_wait_for_volume_attachment_not_present fails with StopIteration" [Undecided,New]
14:54:40 <kopecmartin> a few times our gates failed on one of the unit tests with StopIteration error
14:54:42 <gmann> ah yeah, its in my list but forgot. let me do it today
14:54:57 <kopecmartin> however i'm not sure we can address that from tempest
14:55:34 <kopecmartin> it seems it's random python error , but i haven't dig deeper
14:56:05 <slaweq> gmann: nope
14:56:25 <slaweq> I didn't work on that at all, just commented in the LP
14:56:34 <gmann> i see.
14:57:14 <gmann> kopecmartin: on StopIteration,  how frequent is that?
14:57:27 <kopecmartin> i think i saw that twice
14:57:32 <kopecmartin> not frequent
14:58:12 <kopecmartin> i tried to run it locally in a loop with different py versions i didn't hit the issue
14:59:42 <gmann> I saw temp dir error also yesterday,  do we have bug for that if not i can add for tracking
15:00:02 <gmann> that happen in unit tests
15:00:25 <kopecmartin> we don't
15:00:26 <kopecmartin> sure
15:00:31 <gmann> k
15:00:34 <masayukig> sorry for my time management. We're running out of time
15:00:43 <masayukig> Let's close the office hour
15:00:49 <kopecmartin> that temp dir issue is more frequent than StopIteration
15:00:50 <kopecmartin> masayukig: sure
15:00:55 <gmann> yeah
15:00:58 <masayukig> #endmeeting