14:00:12 #startmeeting qa 14:00:12 Meeting started Tue Mar 23 14:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is masayukig. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'qa' 14:00:22 hi, who all here today? 14:00:25 hello 14:00:27 hi 14:00:28 hi masayukig o/ 14:00:34 hi o/ 14:00:44 (my irc bot is working this week \o/ :D ) 14:00:55 :) 14:01:06 o/ 14:01:17 OK, let's start 14:01:23 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting 14:01:30 ^^^^^^ today's agenda 14:01:53 #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) 14:02:37 I have two things. 14:03:30 1. Now Wallaby R-3, so, we have to release #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/releases 14:03:57 R-3 or later 14:04:04 ah, yea 14:04:53 for patrole we need to wait for this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/780622 14:05:08 and we need to check for tempest too, what all we can get in for this release 14:05:12 also, this devstack refactor is important for cinder-backup to support more drivers, and test the s3 one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770171 14:05:31 (I wanted to mention this later, but it seemed the right time) 14:05:36 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770171 14:05:41 gmann: tosky thanks 14:06:01 2. About the PTG, we'll talk about it later. 14:06:05 May be next week I can check patrole and tempest pending patches and release new tag 14:06:24 gmann: thank you so much! 14:06:30 that's all from my side 14:06:43 let's move on 14:06:48 #topic Wallaby Priority Items progress 14:06:55 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-wallaby-priority 14:07:10 Any updates for the priorities? 14:07:53 kopecmartin: soniya29 how close we are for scenario manager stable? 14:08:09 i remember last time we discussed the few things to finish which i added in etherpad 14:08:18 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tempest-scenario-manager 14:08:43 those are still in progress 14:08:56 gmann, we have just two more apis for nova-network stuff to be pending 14:09:02 last two one 14:09:34 kopecmartin: soniya29 can we get that in before April 2nd which is what is deadline for Tempest final release 14:09:49 i thinks so 14:09:50 sure gmann 14:09:53 *think 14:09:58 great 14:10:02 cool 14:10:10 i will need help from you 14:10:12 if you can push the code then we can merge them quickly 14:10:15 soniya29: sure 14:10:21 sure, 14:10:47 i think that is worth to wait for final release. 14:10:56 yeah 14:11:05 I agree 14:11:35 OK, let's move on to the next topic if nothing else on this topic 14:11:54 soniya29: L358 to 364 you need to do all in once patch as they can break some tests 14:12:03 soniya29: that is why your current patch failing. 14:12:16 one patch 14:13:07 gmann, sure 14:13:54 thanks 14:14:39 anything else to discuss on this topic? 14:15:01 that's all from me 14:15:07 thanks 14:15:09 anything else to discuss on this topic? 14:15:12 sorry 14:15:15 #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning 14:15:35 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-ptg 14:16:10 As I already emailed, we have to submit our vPTG slot 14:16:35 I can see only three people on the doodle now #link https://doodle.com/poll/5ixvdcbm488kc2ic 14:16:42 yeah, we can decide the slot now 14:17:06 The first 4 hours of the PTG are enough for us? 14:17:36 yeah, as per current topic list we should book for 4 hours. 14:17:49 and secure rbac can take more time so keeping buffer is good 14:18:34 OK, I just put QA slots for four hours on Grizzly 14:18:41 I think Monday- Tuesday 13-15 UTC? 14:19:03 or Monday 13-15 UTC and Tuesday - Wed 13-14 UTC ? 14:20:47 i'm fine with both 14:20:57 gmann: Oh, are Tuesday 13-15 UTC OK for you? 14:21:26 yeah that can work but if we divide between Tuesday and Wed then it can be even better 14:22:05 but whatever works for others, both option work for me 14:22:35 gmann: kopecmartin I put them on Cactus. Do they work for you? 14:22:41 yes 14:23:05 yeah. 14:23:06 Mon13-15UTC, Tue 13-14 Wed 13-14 14:23:09 OK, cool 14:23:15 thanks 14:24:02 OK, that's all from my side 14:24:03 once keystone slots are there we can adjust the secure rbac topic as we need lbragstad or other keystone members for that. 14:24:27 yeah 14:24:43 i added note in etherpad too 14:25:23 lbragstad: its about devstack/tempest next steps for secure rbac. L41 for QA PTG https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-ptg 14:25:47 kopecmartin: could you submit the vptg survey if you have bw? #link https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/april2021_vptg_survey 14:26:01 masayukig: yes, sure 14:26:33 thanks! 14:26:36 I think you'll moderate. There's a question about it :) "Who will be moderating their discussions?" 14:26:45 on the survey 14:26:58 already reading .. yeah , ok :) 14:27:18 thanks again :-) 14:27:43 OK, I think that's all for this topic 14:27:47 #topic Gate Status Checks 14:28:10 Any blocker or patches for the gate 14:28:11 ? 14:28:36 patrole gate unblock is in gate 14:28:37 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/780622 14:29:00 and i think other gate is green. 14:29:19 thanks 14:29:29 it seems like the unblock patch needs another unblock patch :D 14:29:56 hmm.. 14:29:58 masayukig: kopecmartin we need to be little careful now about feature freeze as its R-3 14:30:09 for devstack, tempest, grenade especially 14:30:16 and devstack is more critical 14:31:01 sure 14:31:12 kopecmartin: ah right, dansmith image namespace client work needs to be taken care 14:31:17 I will update that today 14:31:52 cool 14:31:56 thanks 14:32:23 #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks 14:32:35 Periodic stable: #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable 14:33:18 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic 14:33:26 masayukig: kopecmartin added a topic in ptg etherapd too to clearly define what is feature freeze for QA 14:33:39 gmann: perfect 14:33:43 we can discuss what is allowed and what is not 14:33:44 great 14:33:50 that will be helpful 14:34:10 yes. 14:34:45 It seems almost green the periodic jobs now 14:34:53 yeah 14:35:15 ok, cool 14:35:23 #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program) 14:35:38 Tempest 14:35:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open 14:36:04 Any tempest patches to discuss? 14:36:15 I think scenario manager is one things we need to get in for final release and I will also check if anything else we need to merge on priority 14:36:46 thanks 14:38:08 nothing specific from my side, i'll go through the patches too 14:38:21 nice, +1 14:39:03 thanks. ok, how about patrole? #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open 14:39:17 i think the gate fix we can merge 14:39:38 I do not think there is any other open things there 14:39:44 ok, we already talked 14:39:52 Devstack 14:39:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open 14:40:08 or may be this #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/patrole/+/778573 14:40:14 but that is failing in zuul 14:41:18 here is the place where I would have mentioned the devstack review above about cinder-backup 14:42:26 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770171 14:42:30 This one? 14:42:54 yes, that one 14:44:12 I see. thanks 14:44:43 Merged openstack/devstack master: nova: Default NOVA_USE_SERVICE_TOKEN to True https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/775573 14:45:33 anything else on devstack? 14:46:43 Grenade #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open 14:47:12 I don't see patches these days 14:47:42 And, how about Hacking? 14:47:45 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open 14:47:50 may be this one #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/749358 14:48:06 otherwise not much in grenade side 14:48:36 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/hacking/+/773814 14:49:01 as discussed in TC and I updated on ML, we can remove the l-c completly 14:49:26 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021204.html 14:49:57 OK 14:50:13 I already +2, though :p 14:50:30 #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change 14:50:41 Any other gate blocker or urgent ones? 14:51:11 gmann: hi 14:51:17 slaweq: hi 14:51:34 may I have some question or do You have meeting now? 14:51:48 we are in office hour 14:52:01 ok, I will get back later 14:52:03 sorry 14:52:05 sure 14:52:23 masayukig: nothing gate blocker as far as i know or what we already discussed 14:52:28 yeah 14:52:34 #topic Open Discussion 14:52:44 Anything to discuss? 14:52:46 very quick question, you may have seen https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/782392 - it is possible with some fixes to devstack-plugin-ceph to have that test passing 14:53:06 (proper working of snapshots deletion) 14:53:24 but I'm not 100% sure that it would work on all branches were tempest runs, due to the different version of ceph supported 14:53:49 what should I do in that case? Change the skip based on the protocol into a skip based on a keyword, so that each job can set it? 14:54:20 tosky: but that bug is still not fixed? #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1677525 14:54:23 Launchpad bug 1663814 in Cinder "duplicate for #1677525 RBD:failed to delete a referenced snapshot" [Undecided,New] 14:55:00 gmann: the bug is fixed if you use ceph >= mimic and you set a configuration setting (using the new Ceph Clone v2 API) 14:55:03 or something like that 14:55:30 I've been helping other people who were testing it 14:55:34 Sorin Sbârnea proposed opendev/elastic-recheck master: WIP: Run elastic-recheck container https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/elastic-recheck/+/729623 14:55:56 and I'd like to have it enabled in the gates too if possible 14:56:40 hmm, I think it's not so quick question :) Can we discuss it after the office hour? 14:56:54 I might not understand it completely, but you are saying with configuration change it can pass? 14:57:24 and with default or some configuration it cannot ? 14:57:34 and how about configuration we have in gate? 14:57:41 sure, we can close the office hour and discuss it immediately afterward 14:57:48 tosky: thanks 14:58:00 #topic Bug Triage (last 30 min) 14:58:17 kopecmartin: sorry for the short, any critical bugs? 14:58:26 none critical ones 14:58:34 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-wallaby 14:58:39 kopecmartin: thanks! 14:58:49 (apologize, I though "Open Discussion" was the last point) 14:59:10 np, i haven't had much time for bugs lately :/ 14:59:36 tosky: no worries. That's my bad time management 14:59:57 OK, let's close the office hour, anyway 15:00:03 thank you all 15:00:10 #endmeeting