14:00:32 <kopecmartin> #startmeeting qa
14:00:33 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Apr 27 14:00:32 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:37 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'qa'
14:00:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting
14:00:47 <kopecmartin> ^^^^^^ today's agenda
14:00:59 <kopecmartin> hi all , who is here today?
14:01:09 <paras333> hey
14:01:28 <yoctozepto> \o/
14:01:50 * gmann in internal meeting too.
14:03:12 <kopecmartin> ok then, let's start
14:03:13 <kopecmartin> #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)
14:03:20 <kopecmartin> last week was PTG
14:03:45 <kopecmartin> we have discussed very interesting topics
14:03:58 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-ptg
14:04:23 <kopecmartin> list of the discussed topics together with the notes from the discussions are at ^^
14:05:04 <kopecmartin> i wanna thank all participants who joined PTG, many great facts were raised
14:05:37 <kopecmartin> i don't have any other announcement , let's move on
14:05:39 <kopecmartin> #topic Xena Priority Items progress
14:05:46 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-xena-priority
14:06:02 <kopecmartin> that's the new etherpad for tracking priority items we will use during this cycle
14:06:26 <kopecmartin> all of the unfinished items from wallaby were moved to this new etherpad
14:06:40 <gmann> +1
14:06:48 <paras333> great, thanks!
14:06:49 <kopecmartin> and of course the new items (which came out of the ptg discussions) were added there too
14:07:28 <kopecmartin> there is one item which doesn't have a volunteer yet  and it's been around for some time already
14:07:31 <kopecmartin> 'Patrole speed improvements'
14:07:46 <kopecmartin> so if anyone is interested in that, let me know
14:08:14 <kopecmartin> it's just one week after ptg so i don't expect that we have any updates regarding the priority items, do we?
14:09:15 <gmann> I started two of them
14:09:34 <gmann> Tempest plugins should use master tempest in their testing jobs
14:09:41 <gmann> started the testing patches with req change
14:09:42 <kopecmartin> great, gmann++
14:10:05 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/787621 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/787622
14:10:26 <gmann> seems its working and I will discuss with req team and their script adjustment
14:10:45 <gmann> "Fix backward compatibility of run-tempest role "
14:10:49 <gmann> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/787455
14:11:09 <gmann> added tempest version for stable jobs but need to test it properly with stable branch gater
14:11:11 <gmann> gate
14:11:28 <gmann> that is all from me
14:11:47 <kopecmartin> great work, thank you gmann
14:12:42 <kopecmartin> let's move on
14:12:43 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Status Checks
14:12:50 <kopecmartin> any blockers?
14:14:23 <kopecmartin> #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks
14:14:28 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-all&job_name=tempest-full-oslo-master&pipeline=periodic
14:14:39 <kopecmartin> seems ok, just a few random failures
14:15:43 <kopecmartin> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable
14:16:05 <kopecmartin> seems fine too
14:16:25 <kopecmartin> #topic Sub Teams highlights (Sub Teams means individual projects under QA program)
14:16:34 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/tempest+status:open
14:16:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/patrole+status:open
14:16:35 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/devstack+status:open
14:16:37 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/grenade+status:open
14:16:38 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/hacking+status:open
14:17:13 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:17:26 <kopecmartin> all patches with Review-Priority==+1 ^^
14:17:50 <kopecmartin> there are several ones
14:18:14 <kopecmartin> i did some triaging of InProgress bugs for tempest and devstack today
14:18:45 <kopecmartin> and marked a few patches with Review-Priority==+1 so that we can unstuck the patches
14:18:47 <kopecmartin> and bugs ..
14:18:57 <kopecmartin> so when free , please review :)
14:20:07 <kopecmartin> #topic Gate Blocker Fix / Urgent Change
14:20:15 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)
14:20:24 <kopecmartin> patches with Review-Priority==+2 ^^
14:21:00 <kopecmartin> we can probably remove the priority from
14:21:02 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/765149
14:21:21 <kopecmartin> as it's been around for several months and basically unchanged since January
14:23:06 <kopecmartin> #topic Open Discussion
14:23:14 <kopecmartin> (yoctozepto) how do we handle old stable branches (em) for devstack-plugin-ceph?
14:23:28 <gmann> that is all done i think
14:23:35 <yoctozepto> em?
14:23:45 <yoctozepto> I don't remember
14:23:59 <yoctozepto> pre-train is unhandled
14:24:14 <gmann> yeah, until train it is all done i think
14:24:19 <yoctozepto> perhaps we need to catch cinder and manila folks
14:24:28 <yoctozepto> wheether they care at all
14:24:44 <gmann> pre-train I will say if anyone interested for ceph on EM branch then it can be proposed
14:25:16 <gmann> my suggestion is leave it for now, if anyone see failure when it happen then we can ask them to do same what we did for stable branhc
14:25:26 <yoctozepto> ok, so we just let them have as many extra branches as they want
14:25:44 <yoctozepto> from train most probably
14:25:47 <yoctozepto> all right
14:25:49 <gmann> yeah, EM are like that
14:26:06 <tbarron> I'm OK with that, suspect we were broken pre-train in manila anyways, with non-voting jobs.
14:26:27 <yoctozepto> well then it's not making it worse :-)
14:26:36 <yoctozepto> thx tbarron for confirming
14:26:36 <tbarron> yoctozepto: yes
14:26:37 <gmann> yeah and i am sure this is same situation for non=ceph jobs also for many projects
14:27:04 <yoctozepto> ok, so let's delete this point from the agenda
14:27:12 <yoctozepto> we have a plan
14:27:13 <gmann> so we do like 'fix if you start caring about' instead of 'fixing in advance even it is not needed'
14:27:25 <gmann> +1
14:27:28 <yoctozepto> indeed
14:27:31 <tbarron> +1
14:27:54 <yoctozepto> kopecmartin?
14:28:04 <tbarron> cinder folks might care in which case they can propose ...
14:28:07 <kopecmartin> sounds good
14:28:15 <yoctozepto> ok
14:28:19 <tbarron> nothing is free
14:29:05 <kopecmartin> anyone anything else to discuss?
14:29:13 <yoctozepto> not me
14:29:20 <gmann> tbarron: +1
14:31:05 <kopecmartin> ok then
14:31:07 <kopecmartin> #topic Bug Triage (last 30 min)
14:31:14 <kopecmartin> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-xena
14:31:42 <kopecmartin> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/779756
14:31:58 <kopecmartin> it will fix
14:32:01 <kopecmartin> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1914229
14:32:01 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1914229 in tempest "DNS servers retrieval change with systemd-resolved" [Undecided,In progress]
14:32:42 <kopecmartin> i'd like to finally close it however , take your time for reviewing it
14:32:47 <kopecmartin> i wrote a very long comment
14:32:54 <kopecmartin> gathering the facts
14:33:07 <kopecmartin> in order to make a decision
14:33:51 <kopecmartin> apart from that i don't have anything else for bug triage
14:36:02 <kopecmartin> that's all :)
14:36:07 <kopecmartin> thank you
14:36:24 <kopecmartin> #endmeeting